多重可实现论题是关于心身关系和还原性质辩论中的一个关键问题。它主张同一心理属性或类型可以由许多不同的物理神经基质实现，通过证明神经状态到心理状态的多对一映射，从而拒绝同一论。目前，关于多重可实现的理论真实性问题再度引发热议。心灵究竟能否多重实现？这已不再是哲学家们基于直觉出发的逻辑可能性设想，而是实证科学背景下对心灵问题发起的新型叩问与挑战。

本研究从具身视角出发，强调身体对个体心灵塑造及其实现方面的关键性作用。研究主旨有二：其一，旨在通过论证，对心灵能够多重可实现的理论可能性进行限制；其二，旨在关注当代心灵观在具身视阈下的变革和翻新，考察具身视角下的一系列心灵图景。具体而言，本研究的任务是对心灵多重可实现的理论可能性加以限制，对具身的心灵观加以拓展深化，最终通过描绘一系列具身视角下的心灵图景，展现出具身认知在科学哲学和心灵哲学方面所带来的革命性变革。具体研究脉络如下：

首先，梳理多重可实现理论的理论缘起及理论内容，追踪多重可实现两次发展浪潮中的不同发展路径。此外，对多重可实现的实现概念内涵进行分析，剖离出实现概念在多重可实现理论中所牵涉到的两种主流科学解释模式，即机制性实现解释和结构性实现解释。其次，刻画了多重可实现的几种典型判定标准，即同而不同判定标准、机制判定标准和层次判定标准，对其中每种方案的优缺点进行了考察与评价，并指出多重可实现的判定标准仍成难题，暂时难以适用于心灵之上。再次，从具身视角切入并聚焦于心智特征，尝试探讨在什么条件下能够完成多重可实现的理论可能性。在充分探讨了具身视角下认知科学心智观所发生的巨大变革后，把多重可实现分析考察的落脚点置于约束理论。通过梳理生命演化中的必然约束-大脑的内部约束-身体的具身约束路线，串联起有关生命进化-大脑发育-身体限制的三条证据链。研究发现，人类特有的生理结构和身体体验在形成人类心智过程中发挥了关键作用，这种心智演化是带有必然性约束且不可逆转的，因此从根本上极大地限制了心智能够多重实现的方式。最后，跳脱多重可实现的论述框架，重点关注具身视角下的一系列心灵图景。通过对具身心灵观的理论内涵、发展现状和科学证据的关注，更为系统地掌握当代心灵观在具身视阈下的变革和翻新。在此基础上，进一步考察脑机接口技术对具身心灵所带来的种种挑战，回应心灵在能否延展问题上存在的种种质疑。心灵在根本上是具身的，即便未来新型技术能够提供心灵逃离肉身的可能性神话，从本质上说，身体才是最终提供个体以充满意义、结构和可能性世界的根本所在。

The Multiple Realizability Thesis is a crucial issue in the debate on mind-body relations as well as the reductive properties. It advocates many different physical neural substrates which can realize the same mental property or type, thus rejecting the identity theory by proving the many-to-one mapping of neural states to mental states. Therefore, the Multiple Realizability Thesis is also seen as a crucial argument in the supporting of non-reductive physicalism in contemporary philosophy of mind. Currently, the theoretical authenticity of multiple realizability has sparked heated discussion again. Can the mind be multiply realized? This question is no longer a logical possibility conceived by philosophers based on intuition, but a new type of inquiry and challenge to the problem of the mind in the context of empirical science.

From the perspective of embodied view, this study emphasizes the critical role of the body in shaping and realizing the individual mind. The primary purpose of this study is twofold: firstly, through argumentation, it aims at limiting the theoretical possibility that the mind can be multiply realizable; Secondly, it aims at focusing on the transformation and renovation of the contemporary view of the mind from the perspective of embodiment, as well as examining a series of mental pictures from the embodied perspective. To be specific, the task of this research is to limit the possibility of multiple realizability thesis of mind, to expand and deepen the embodied view of mind, and finally to show the revolutionary changes brought by embodied cognition in the philosophy of science and philosophy of mind by depicting a series of mental images from the perspective of the embodied cognition. The specific research content is as follows：

Firstly, the dissertation reviews the theoretical origin and content of Multiple Realizability Thesis, and traces the different development paths of two waves of multiple realizability. In addition, this research analyzes the connotation of “realization” of multiple realizability, disentangles two mainstream scientific explanatory models involved in the concept of “realization” in Multiple Realizability Thesis, i.e., the mechanistic realization explanation and the structural realization explanation. Secondly, the research portrays several typical delimitation criteria for multiple realization, namely the “same but different” delimitation criteria, as well as the mechanism and hierarchy delimitation criteria, then evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of each scheme, the research points out that the delimitation criteria of Multiple Realizability Thesis are still difficult to be applied to the mind. Thirdly, the dissertation focuses on the characteristics of the mind from an embodied perspective, attempting to explore the theoretical possibilities of the conditions under which multiple realizations can be accomplished. After thoroughly exploring the dramatic changes in the cognitive scientific view of mind from an embodied perspective, this research places the landing point for examining of multiple realizability in the Constraints Theory. By sorting out the inevitable constraint, internal brain constraint, and embodied constraint routes in the evolution of life, we connect three chains of evidence on the evolution of life, brain development, and body constraints. The research suggests that human-specific physiological structures and bodily experiences have played a crucial role in shaping the human mind, the evolution of mind is inevitably constrained and irreversible, and thus fundamentally limits the ways in which the mind can be realized in multiple ways. Finally, the dissertation jumps out of the framework of multiple realization and focuses on a series of mental visions from the embodied perspective. By focusing on the theoretical connotation, development status, and scientific evidence of the embodied mind view, a more systematically grasp the transformation and renovation of the contemporary mind view from the perspective of the embodied mind can be made. On this basis, it further examines the various challenges brought by the brain-computer interface technology to the embodied mind, and responds to various doubts about whether the mind can be extended. The mind is fundamentally embodied, even if the future technology can allow the mind to escape from the body, the body is still the root of the world that ultimately provides individuals with meaning, structure, and possibility.