帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪（以下简称“帮信罪”）是当前常见多发的犯罪类型，且存在诸多争议性判例。同时，帮信罪与洗钱相关犯罪的区分与界定并不明确，亟需进一步阐明。因此，在解读帮信罪的主客观要件，包括主观上的“明知”和客观上的“帮助行为”以及“情节严重”的基础上，从法益保护、罪行特征、犯罪对象、主观认知和量刑轻重五个方面对帮信罪与洗钱犯罪之间的静态区别进行讨论，提出更为完善的重构体系，以使两罪在实际适用中的界定思路更为清晰。最后，运用案例分析法，通过具有争议性的司法判例验证模型的适用性，从静态与动态两个层次明确帮信罪与洗钱犯罪的界限。

The crime of assisting information network criminal activities is a common type of crime at present, and there are many controversial cases. At the same time, the distinction and definition between the crime of assisting information network criminal activities and the related crime of money laundering are not clear and need to be further clarified. On the basis of interpreting the subjective and objective elements of the crime of assisting information network criminal activities, including "knowing" subjectively, "helping behavior" and "serious circumstances" objectively, this paper discusses the static differences between the crime of assisting information network criminal activities and the related crime of money laundering from five aspects: legal interest protection, characteristics of the offence, criminal targets, subjective cognition and severity of sentence, and proposes a more perfect reconstruction system, so that the idea of defining the two crimes in practical application is clearer. Finally, using the case analysis method, the applicability of the model is verified by controversial judicial precedents, and the boundary between the crime of assisting information network criminal activities and the related crime of money laundering is clearly defined from the static and dynamic levels.