由于互联网的发展，网络交易已经成为国内普遍且重要的交易方式，交易的达成和履行方便、快捷，能够满足人们的多样性需求，但同时也引发了不少纠纷。日益上升的网络交易纠纷，主要体现为合同纠纷。网络交易平台制定的合同文本中的管辖权条款所引发的争议也越来越多，而这种单方拟定的协议管辖条款极易被网络交易平台利用，对交易相对方不利。

      第一部分，主要是对网络交易平台格式管辖条款的基础进行分析，简要介绍什么是网络交易平台合同，格式管辖条款的特征，通过分析网络交易平台格式管辖条款的设置，了解其内容、性质以及相关的法律规制。

      第二部分，主要分析网络交易平台中格式管辖条款的订立，这是因为网络交易平台中存在的格式管辖条款是格式条款的一种，只有格式条款的订入合同，成为合同的组成部分，才能是对其进行判定。只有明确格式管辖条款的订立规则，是对格式管辖在分析格式管辖条款效力判定的基础。在这一部分里主要从网络交易平台是否尽到了提请相对人注意的义务、是否向相对人对该格式条款进行说明以及相对人接受该格式管辖条款三部分进行论述。

      第三部分，主要分析网络交易平台格式管辖条款效力的司法认定，需要结合格式管辖条款的特征，通过《民事诉讼法司法解释》31条程序法上的规定以及《合同法》、《消费者权益保护法》等实体法中的规定进行综合判断。本部分首先通过检索相关案例分析司法实践中的裁判分歧，对裁判分歧的原因进行归纳总结；其次，对格式管辖条款中约定了管辖条款效力进行分析；再次，归纳总结网络交易平台格式管辖条款无效的法律后果；最后，归纳总结，给出个人建议。

Due to the development of the Internet, online transactions have become a common and important transaction method in China. It is convenient and fast to reach and perform transactions, which can meet people's diverse needs, but at the same time, it has caused many disputes. The increasing disputes over internet transactions are mainly reflected in contract disputes. There are more and more disputes caused by the jurisdiction clauses in the contract texts formulated by the online trading platform, and such unilaterally drafted agreement jurisdiction clauses are easily used by the online trading platform, which is unfavorable to the counterparty of the transaction.

         The first part is mainly to analyze the basis of the online trading platform format jurisdiction clause, briefly introduce what is the online trading platform contract, the characteristics of the format jurisdiction clause, and analyze the setting of the network trading platform format jurisdiction clause to understand its content, nature and related Legal regulations.

The second part mainly analyzes the establishment of the format jurisdiction clause in the online trading platform. This is because the format jurisdiction clause existing in the online trading platform is a type of format clause. Only when the format clause is entered into the contract and becomes an integral part of the contract can it be It is to judge it. Only clear rules for the formulation of formal jurisdiction clauses are the basis for judging the validity of format jurisdiction clauses in analyzing format jurisdiction clauses. In this part, we mainly discuss whether the online trading platform has fulfilled the obligation to draw the attention of the counterpart, whether to explain the format clause to the counterpart, and whether the counterpart accepts the jurisdiction clause of the format.

        The third part mainly analyzes the judicial determination of the validity of the format jurisdiction clause of the online trading platform. It needs to combine the characteristics of the format jurisdiction clause and pass the provisions of the 31 procedural law of the "Judicial Interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law" and the "Contract Law" and "Consumer Rights and Interests" Provide comprehensive judgments based on the provisions of the Substantive Law such as the Protection Law. This part first analyzes the differences of referees in judicial practice by retrieving relevant cases, and summarizes the reasons for the differences of referees; second, it analyzes the effectiveness of the jurisdiction clauses stipulated in the format jurisdiction clauses; again, it concludes that the format jurisdiction clauses of the online trading platform are invalid Legal consequences; finally, summarize and give personal advice.