本文以叙事语篇中的顶针式回指为研究对象，以相应的零形回指作为对比，考察了100篇现代短篇小说，得到研究对象626例，包括顶针式回指414例，相应零形回指212例，这表明当先行语和回指语构成此类回指时，回指语倾向使用显性形式（名词、代词），较少使用隐性形式（零形）。本文统计分析出顶针式回指的语法和篇章表现，总结概括了顶针式回指的使用条件，归纳说明了顶针式回指的篇章作用。

全文共分为四章：

第一章“绪论”，简要介绍了本文的选题缘由和研究对象，梳理了前人的研究成果，说明了本文的理论基础、语料来源和处理方法。

第二章“顶针式回指的分类和句法功能”，发现：顶针式名词和代词回指最倾向的形式为“完全同形”，这种形式同形度最高，识别起来最容易；其次是“只用先行语中的部分”这种简化的“部分同形”形式，符合语言的经济性原则。横向比较，顶针式回指倾向分布的位置是“句子间”和“小句间”，相应零形回指则是“小句间”；顶针式回指和相应零形回指的句法成分倾向均为“动词宾语+主语”模式；顶针式回指和相应零形回指的状态分布倾向均为“中心语+中心语”。与相应的零形回指对比，顶针式回指在这三个方面分布没有那么集中，表现上相对多元，使用上更加灵活。纵向比较，位置处于“句子间”或“段落间”时，顶针式回指优于相应零形回指使用；位置处于“小句间”时，二者使用没有倾向；而位置处于“成分小句间”时，相应零形回指优于顶针式回指。然而，在句法成分和状态分布上，不管哪种模式，顶针式回指均优于相应零形回指使用。

第三章“顶针式回指的语篇分析”，发现：在生命度表现上，横向比较，顶针式回指多用于高生命度对象，相应零形回指多用于低生命度对象；纵向比较，指称对象是高生命度对象时，顶针式回指优于相应零形回指使用，指称对象是低生命度对象时，二者使用没有倾向。在话题持续性上，顶针式回指对象的语篇重要性更高，在后文倾向作为话题持续，而相应的零形回指对象在后文不倾向作为话题持续。在语篇构式上，横向比较，顶针式回指和相应零形回指“背景+前景”模式很少，而与之相对的“前景+背景”模式较多，说明叙事语篇的一种倾向是内容由重要到不重要，篇章连接由事件主线扩展到支线和其他铺垫内容；纵向比较，不管哪种模式，顶针式回指均优于相应零形回指使用。本章最后总结出顶针式回指的语篇作用，一是可以在语篇的话题、叙述方式等发生转换时提供连接，使转换变得自然，二是在很短的语篇范围内重复，有助于强化语义，加深读者心理印象。

第四章“结语”，总结概括了本文的研究结论。

Taking the anadiplosis anaphora in narrative discourses as the research object and the corresponding zero anaphora as the comparison, this paper investigates 100 modern short stories, obtains 626 research objects, including 414 cases of anadiplosis anaphora and 212 cases of corresponding zero anaphora, which shows that when antecedents and anaphors form this kind of anaphora, anaphors use more explicit forms (nouns and pronouns) and less implicit forms (zero forms). This paper statistically analyzes the grammar and textual performance of anadiplosis anaphora, summarizes the application conditions of anadiplosis anaphora, and illustrates the textual function of anadiplosis anaphora.

The whole paper includes four chapters:

The first chapter is "Introduction". It briefly introduces the reasons for choosing the topic and research object of this paper, combs the previous research results, and illustrates the theoretical basis, corpus sources and processing methods.

The second chapter is "The Classification and Syntactic Function of Anadiplosis Anaphora". It is found that the most preferred form of anadiplosis noun and pronoun anaphora is "complete homomorphism", which has the highest degree of homomorphism and is the easiest to identify; the second preferred form is the simplified form of "partial homomorphism", namely, "only the part of the antecedent", which is in line with the economic principle of language. In internal comparison, the most preferred positions of anadiplosis anaphora are "between sentences" and "between clauses", while the corresponding zero anaphora is "between clauses". The syntactic component tendency of both anadiplosis anaphora and corresponding zero anaphora is "verb object + subject". The state distribution tendency of both anadiplosis anaphora and corresponding zero anaphora is "headword + headword". Compared with the corresponding zero anaphora, anadiplosis anaphora is less concentrated in these three aspects, relatively diversified in performance and more flexible in use. In external comparison, when the position is “between sentences” or “between paragraphs”, anadiplosis anaphora is better than the corresponding zero anaphora; when the position is “between clauses”, there is no tendency; when the position is “between constituent clauses”, the corresponding zero anaphora is better than anadiplosis anaphora. However, in terms of syntactic components and state distribution, no matter which model, anadiplosis anaphora is better than the corresponding zero anaphora.

The third chapter is "Discourse Analysis of Anadiplosis Anaphora". It is found that in terms of life performance, in internal comparison, anadiplosis anaphora is mostly used for high life objects, and the corresponding zero anaphora is mostly used for low life objects; in external comparison, when the reference object is a high life object, anadiplosis anaphora is better than the corresponding zero anaphora, when the reference object is a low life object, there is no tendency. In terms of topic continuity, anadiplosis anaphora objects are more important in discourses, and tend to continue as topics in the later text, while the corresponding zero anaphora objects do not tend to continue as topics in the later text. In terms of discourse structure, in internal comparison, there are a few "background + foreground" patterns of anadiplosis anaphora and corresponding zero anaphora, while there are more "foreground + background" patterns, which shows that one tendency of narrative discourse is that the content is from important to unimportant, and the discourse connection is extended from the main line of events to branch lines and other paving contents; in external comparison, no matter which pattern, anadiplosis anaphora is better than the corresponding zero anaphora. At last, this chapter summarizes the textual function of anadiplosis anaphora, one is to provide connection when the topic and narrative mode of the discourse change, so as to make the transformation natural, and the other is to repeat within a very short discourse range, which is helpful to strengthen semantics and deepen readers' psychological impression.

The fourth chapter is "Conclusion". It summarizes the research conclusions of this paper.