“无我见”的抉择问题是中观哲学的关键问题。如何定义“我”，抉择“无我”的范围、次第及原因，中观应成派和自续派有不同的看法。产生宗义分歧的同时，也使得问题愈加复杂难辨。应成派认为，“我”就是不依仗他的自性，胜义与名言皆无自性。而自续派则认为，“我”在人上为相续的心识，在法上是胜义无自性，名言有自性。关于两派对这一问题的分歧，从派别系统的宗义分辨梳理来看，主要原因在于两派理论基础的不同。应成派如此抉择的原因主要是其建立在“假必依假”的理论上。自续派以下见解主要建立在“假必依实”的基础上，因而对“无我”有不同程度的抉择。另一方面，以观修证道的修行实践角度来说，不同的见解有次第先后，却无高下优劣之分。

"View of selflessness" choice is a key issue in the philosophy of Madhyamaka. On the issue of how to define "Self" and choose the scope, order, and reason of “selflessness”. "Prasangika madhyamaka" and "Svatantrika madhyamaka" hold different opinions. This not only produces a division of confessionalism, but also makes the problem more complicated and difficult to discern. Prasangika madhyamaka believes that "Self" does not rely on its own nature, and neither the meaning of Ultimate Truths nor the Conventional Truths are inherent. The Svatantrika madhyamaka believes that "Self" is a person's mind-stream. In phenomena, ultimately all things are the self lack intrinsic nature，but they have intrinsic character conventionally. Regarding the differences between the two factions on this issue, from the perspective of distinguishing and analyzing the tenets of different faction systems, the main reason f lies in the difference in the theoretical basis of the two factions. The reason for Prasangika madhyamaka’s choice is that it is based on the theory that "imputation also need rely on imputation (imputation does not exist essentially)”. Svatantrika madhyamaka are mainly based on the principle that " imputation depend on facts”. therefore there are different degrees of choice for selflessness. On the other hand, from the perspective of practicing Buddhism, though different opinions have successive stages, there is no superiority and inferiority.