阅卷权是被追诉方依法获悉控诉方所掌握的案件信息的程序性权利，为辩护权及辩护程序服务。我国刑事诉讼中，行使阅卷权的立法设计以辩护律师为主，立法并未承认被追诉人的阅卷权。被追诉人阅卷权的缺位不仅不利于辩护权行使，也不利于程序正义的实现。本文在总结我国被追诉人阅卷权的立法和实务现状的基础上，回应阅卷权权属争议，结合控辩平等理论、有效辩护理论与程序主体理论来阐释赋予被追诉人阅卷权的法理基础和现实意义。构建被追诉人阅卷权制度，需要公检法的共同配合，由相关司法机关告知被追诉人其具有阅卷权，在审查起诉阶段和审判阶段允许被追诉人阅卷。为有效预防被追诉人阅卷后可能产生的风险，如打击、报复证人、受害人，也应对其阅卷范围进行限制或者进行技术手段处理。同时，应完善被追诉人阅卷相关救济程序来保障权利的正常行使。

The right to access case files is the procedural right of the accused to know the information of the case held by the complainant according to law, which serves the right of defense and defense procedure.The legislative design of our country's examination right system is mainly based on defence counsel and does not recognize the right of the accused to review the file. The absence of the accused's right to read the file is not only detrimental to the exercise of the right to defense, but also detrimental to the realization of procedural justice. Based on summarizing the legislation and practice of the right to read the file of the accused in China on the current situation, this paper responds to the dispute over the ownership of the right to read the file, combined with the theory of equality between the prosecution and the defense, the theory of effective defense and the theory of procedural subject to explain the right to read the file of the accused of the jurisprudence of the legal basis and the significance of the reality. The construction of the system of the right of the accused to read the documents requires the joint cooperation of the public prosecutors and the law, the relevant judicial organs to inform the accused of their right to read the case files, and to allow the prosecuted to review the case files in the prosecution stage and the trial stage. In order to effectively prevent the risks that may arise when the prosecuted person reads the file, such as striking and retaliating against witnesses and victims, the scope of their reading of the case file should also be restricted or dealt with by technical means. At the same time, remedial procedures should be improved to ensure the proper exercise of the right of the accused to review the file.