我国《刑法修正案（九）》新增了有关虚假诉讼罪的规定，并在 2018 年公布《关于办理虚假诉讼刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》，但学术界与司法实践中对虚假诉讼罪中“捏造的事实”的认定标准一直存在较大争论。本文在第一章以行为目的、与他人合谋与否、涵盖内容三个划分标准介绍虚假诉讼罪在我国的常见类型。第二章从形式解释和实质解释统一的原则出发，论述虚假诉讼罪保护的法益为单一法益，即正常司法秩序。第三章讨论“捏造的事实”是否包括“部分篡改”。第四章讨论“捏造的事实”是否包括“隐瞒真相”。第五章论述“捏造的事实”中“事实”这一概念要与“理由”“证据”区分开来，且也应当包括由他人捏造的事实。

The Criminal Law Amendment (9) added new provisions on the crime of falselawsuits. In 2018, the Interpretation of Several Questions Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of False Lawsuit was promulgated.However, the standard of fabricating facts remains controversial in academia andjudicial practice. In Chapter One, the paper analyzes the most common types offalse litigation crime and the specific connotation in judicial practice. In Chapter Two, based on the principle of the unity of literal interpretation and material interpretation, the paper discusses the only legal interest protected by the crime of false lawsuits is the judicial order. In Chapter Three, the paper discusses fabricating facts should include concealment of the truth. In Chapter Four, the paper discusses fabricating facts should include the behavior of partial falsification. In Chapter Five, the paper discusses the fact in fabricated facts should be distinguished from
reason and evidence. And the facts fabricated by others are included in fabricated facts.