为缓解购买力低下与住房需求增长的矛盾，韩国的传贳习惯在19世纪中后期因运而生。有住房需求的人通过支付传贳金的方式，在一定期限内对他人的不动产进行使用收益，在期限届满时返还对该不动产的占有并要求返还传贳金。1958年《韩国民法典》对这一民间习惯进行专章规定，自此传贳权作为一项明文规定的法律制度进入了新的发展阶段。1984年修订《韩国民法典》时，对传贳权制度进一步修订、完善。本文将通过研究法律规定、论文、书籍等文献资料，立足于传贳权领域内已有研究成果，对传贳权的历史演进、基本原理进行归纳、再整理，同时结合学说、判例分析基本原理的理论发展变化。 传贳在相当长的历史时期内在民间广为流行、运用广泛。本文将利用实证分析法，收集韩国政府、社会组织等部门机构公布的关于传贳权在现代社会中利用情况的相关数据资料，并整理分析，以把握传贳权制度在社会中的发展现状以及未来的应用新动向。 修订之后的传贳权制度出现的争议和纠纷一般会由法院判例指引出方向。本文结合1984年后韩国大法院关于传贳权的判例，整理司法实践中关于传贳权制度的争议焦点，选取典型判例，对纠纷类型进行分类，研究韩国大法院判例中关于传贳权登记设立、传贳期间传贳权与传贳金返还请求权是否能分离、传贳期间届满后传贳权抵押权是否消失和传贳权抵押权如何实现、传贳权设定人能否对传贳权抵押权行使抵销权、拍卖程序中的分配请求权等等问题的判决立场，分析传贳权制度的理论完善方向。 同样源于东方文明的土壤上诞生的典权虽然与传贳权形成的社会背景不尽相同，但在总体功能上具有一定程度的相似性。在我国同样面临着城市化进程深化、城市人口住房紧张的社会背景下，许多学者一方面考虑到典权作为我国优秀法律文化应当予以保留，一方面认为激活典权有利于解决当下的社会问题，因此也对典权制度的现代化改革提出建议和方案设计。本文最后将通过比较研究法，结合韩国传贳权制度和判例中的新动向，对典权现代化改革方向提出新的建议。

In order to alleviate the contradiction between low purchasing power and increasing demand for housing, the habit of chonse was born during the mid-late 19th century in Korea. People with housing needs used the proceeds of real estate for a certain period of time by paying chonsegwon deposit money, and returned the possession of the real property at the expiration of the time limit and requested the return of the chonsegwon deposit money. In 1958, the Korean Civil Code stipulated a special chapter on this folk custom. Since then, the chonse-right had entered a new stage of development as a legal system. When the Korean Civil Code amended was in 1984, the system of chonse-right got further revised and improved. Based on the existing research results in the field of chonse-right, this paper studies the legal regulations, papers, books and other literature materials, combines the theoretical development changes of basic principles of doctrine and case analysis, and summarizes and reorganizes the historical evolution and basic principles of chonse-right. Chonse was popular and widely used in the civil society for a long time in history. This paper uses empirical analysis to collect and analyze relevant data on the use of chonse-right in the modern society published by the Korean government, social organizations and other departments, in order to understand the development status and application trends of the chonse-right system in society. Disputes related to the revised chonse-right system are generally guided by legal precedents. This article combines the jurisprudence of the Korean Grand Court on chonse-right after 1984, sorts out the controversial focus on the chonse-right system in judicial practice, selects typical jurisprudence, classifies the types of disputes, and studies the judgment position of variable topics. For instance, whether the chonse-right and the right to return the chonsegwon deposit money can be separated during the right period, whether the mortgage of the chonse-right has disappeared after the expiration of the right period and how the mortgage is realized will be discussed here. This paper also analyzes the orientation of theoretical perfection of the chonse-right system based on the research results. Although the social background of Chinese pawning right is not the same as that of the chonse-right, the two have a certain degree of similarity in overall function as they are both derived from the Eastern civilization. Under the social background that China is also facing the deepening of urbanization and the housing shortage for urban population, many scholars have considered that the pawning right should be retained as an excellent legal culture in China, and believe that the activation of the pawning right is conducive to solving the current social problems. Therefore, they also put forward suggestions and program design for the modernization reform of the pawning right system. At the end of the paper, through the comparative research method, combined with the new trends in the Korean chonse-right system and the jurisprudence, new suggestions for the reform direction of the pawning right modernization are put forward.