本文通过对基于人权的气候变化诉讼案例的分析， 总结了区域人权法院对气候变化诉讼的人权方向的多维度影响以及联合国系统为应对气候变化对人权的侵害提供的非诉救济途径。通过实证研究，总结了各主要人权法律依据在不同国家气候人权诉讼中的适用情况。同时，本文阐述了诉讼过程中人权与环境的连结在程序上和实体上所面临的困难。总的来说，基于人权的气候变化诉讼依然面临学理和实践的双重障碍，但其展现出了强劲的活力和高度的可塑性，具有推动社会与政策变革的潜力。在联合国系统鼓励和确认气候变化与人权之间产生实质连结的背景下，中国应考虑将人权因素纳入气候环境治理体系。

This article analyzes cases of climate change litigation based on human rights, and summarizes the multidimensional impact of regional human rights courts on human rights in climate change litigation, as well as the non-litigation remedies provided by the United Nations system for human rights violations caused by climate change. Through empirical research, the article summarizes the application of major human rights laws in climate change litigation in various countries. The article also explains the difficulties in linking human rights and the environment in both procedural and substantive aspects of litigation. Overall, human rights-based climate change litigation still faces dual barriers of theory and practice, but it demonstrates strong vitality and high plasticity, and has the potential to promote social and policy change. Against the backdrop of the United Nations system encouraging and recognizing the substantive connection between climate change and human rights, China should consider incorporating human rights factors into its climate and environmental governance system.