依托当代互联网技术的发展和革新，网络文学已成为当代文学中的重要组成部分，具有巨大的经济效益、社会影响力和文化传播价值。然而，网络文学传播之迅速、读者数量之众和侵权成本之低，以及我国网民淡薄的知识产权意识，使得网络文学著作权侵权事件层出不穷。与此同时，网络文学的跨地域属性和权属模糊等特点，又进一步增加了网络文学著作权保护的难度，对我国著作权相关法律体系提出了巨大的挑战。这就要求法律界对网络文学的著作权授权合同予以规则和完善。本文将探索现行法律体系能否应对著作权授权格式合同缔约和履行中的问题，分析问题的成因并提出完善的路径。

本文可分为四部分。首先对网络文学格式条款的现状进行审视，厘清网络文学著作权授权格式合同的有关概念，分析其特点、内容、实践意义；然后，通过对典型案例的实证分析，探讨实践中的著作权归属问题、对法条表述的具体认定，以期探讨司法实践中对相关立法的落实情况；而后对网络文学著作权授权格式合同常见的法律风险予以探讨和剖析，探究问题背后的原因，从著作权法和民法的有限性两方面分别讨论；最后对现行制度体系提出修改意见，从完善著作权法律体系和讨论制式合同的不可行性两方面给出建议。

Relying on the development and innovation of contemporary Internet technology, online literature has become an important part of contemporary literature, with great economic benefits, social influence and cultural dissemination value. However, the rapid dissemination of online literature, the large number of readers and the low cost of infringement, as well as the weak awareness of intellectual property rights among Chinese netizens, have led to numerous copyright infringement cases of online literature. At the same time, the cross-regional property and ambiguous ownership of online literature further increase the difficulty of copyright protection of online literature and pose a great challenge to China's copyright-related legal system. This requires the legal profession to rule and improve the copyright authorization contract of online literature. This paper will explore whether the current legal system can cope with the problems in the contracting and performance of copyright authorization form contracts, analyze the causes of the problems and propose the path of improvement.

This paper can be divided into four parts. Firstly, it examines the current situation of format clauses of online literature, clarifies the concept of online literature copyright authorization format contract, and analyzes its characteristics, contents and practical significance; then, it discusses and analyzes the common controversial issues and legal risks of online literature copyright authorization format contract; on the basis that the theoretical issues have been fully discussed, the issue of copyright attribution in practice and the specific determination of legal expressions are explored through the empirical analysis of typical cases, with a view to exploring the implementation of relevant legislation in judicial practice; finally, suggestions are made for the modification of the current system, and recommendations are given in terms of improving the copyright legal system and discussing the infeasibility of form contracts.