本研究结合眼动追踪技术探讨个体的生理唤醒对面孔注意和记忆表现的影响。通过对比有声音刺激（生理唤醒）和无声音刺激（无生理唤醒）条件下的瞳孔反应、面孔总注视时间、面孔注意脱离时长、面孔再认正确率和反应时，我们试图揭示生理唤醒在面孔认知加工中的作用。结果显示，在面孔图像呈现的150-1750ms间，生理唤醒条件下的瞳孔扩张显著大于无生理唤醒条件下的瞳孔扩张，表明声音刺激能有效操纵生理唤醒。然而，面孔总注视时间和面孔注意脱离时长在两种条件下无显著差异。在再认任务中，生理唤醒条件下的反应时显著长于无生理唤醒条件下的反应时，但正确率无显著差异。总的来说，本研究没有证据支持生理唤醒能对面孔注意和记忆产生影响。未来的研究应考虑使用情绪性面孔和采用其他范式，以进一步探究生理唤醒对面孔注意和记忆的影响。

This study utilized eye-tracking technology to investigate the influence of individual physiological arousal on facial attention and memory performance. By comparing pupillary responses, total gaze duration on faces, disengagement duration from faces, facial recognition accuracy, and reaction times under conditions with auditory stimulation (physiological arousal) and without auditory stimulation (no physiological arousal), we aimed to unveil the role of physiological arousal in facial cognitive processing. The findings indicated that between 150-1750ms of facial image presentation, the pupillary dilation under the physiological arousal condition was significantly greater than that under the no physiological arousal condition, suggesting that auditory stimulation effectively manipulated physiological arousal. However, there were no significant differences in total gaze duration on faces and disengagement duration from faces between the two conditions. In the recognition task, the reaction time under the physiological arousal condition was significantly longer than that under the no physiological arousal condition, but the accuracy rates showed no significant difference. Overall, this study found no evidence to support the notion that physiological arousal affects facial attention and memory. Future research should consider using emotionally charged faces and adopting other paradigms to further explore the influence of physiological arousal on facial attention and memory.