| 中文题名： | 中国内地仲裁裁决在境外被拒绝承认与执行的实证研究 |
| 姓名： | |
| 保密级别： | 公开 |
| 论文语种： | 中文 |
| 学科代码： | 030101K |
| 学科专业： | |
| 学生类型： | 学士 |
| 学位： | 法学学士 |
| 学位年度： | 2020 |
| 学校： | 北京师范大学 |
| 校区： | |
| 学院： | |
| 第一导师姓名： | |
| 第一导师单位： | |
| 提交日期： | 2020-06-06 |
| 答辩日期： | 2020-05-22 |
| 外文题名： | An Empirical Research on the Denial of Recognition and Enforcement of Mainland China Arbitral Awards out of Mainland China |
| 中文关键词： | |
| 外文关键词： | Mainland China Arbitral awards ; denial of recognition and enforcement ; arbitration agreement ; evidence rules ; New York Convention |
| 中文摘要： |
境外法院对我国内地仲裁裁决的承认与执行情况反映了我国的仲裁服务水平和仲裁公信力。本文以16个境外法院拒绝执行内地仲裁裁决的判例为样本，通过分析法院的拒绝理由及其法律依据，发现境外法院对《公约》第5条规定的“可仲裁性”的理解存在矛盾、举证责任分配方式与《公约》精神不符等问题；内地仲裁存在仲裁协议效力认定不当、仲裁通知不适当、仲裁裁决说理不充分的问题；在境外申请执行过程中，存在申请材料不符合规范、论点提出不及时的问题。因此，仲裁机构应在仲裁协议效力认定、文件制作及送达以及仲裁裁决说理方面做出努力；当事人及其律师在仲裁程序中应为对方提供方便、充分准备申请执行材料、在申请执行过程中注意审级差异并及时提出论点，还应提高应对举证责任的能力。
﹀
|
| 外文摘要： |
The situation of recognition and enforcement of Mainland China arbitral awards out of Mainland China reflects the level of arbitration service as well as the credibility of arbitration on Mainland. Based on the study of factual grounds and legal basis of 16 cases in which the foreign courts either refused or set aside the enforcement of arbitral awards from Mainland China, it is found that foreign courts place contradictory interpretations on the meaning of “arbitrability” ruled by article V of the Convention; also, the disposition modality of burden of proof adopted by the courts doesn’t correspond to the spirit of the Convention. Arbitration on Mainland has the problem of improper judgement on the validity of arbitration agreement, improper notice of arbitration and insufficient reasoning in the arbitral awards; Problems arose in the process of enforcement in relation to the irregularity of submitted application materials and the timing to put forward arguments. Therefore, arbitration commission should make efforts in the confirmation of the validity of arbitration agreement, the composition and delivery of relative documents, and the reasoning in the arbitral award; the applicant and its counsel should seek to provide the counterpart with convenience during the arbitration process, to fully prepare the application material, to attach importance to the difference of trial grades and to improve their capability of coping with the burden of proof.
﹀
|
| 参考文献总数： | 29 |
| 插图总数： | 1 |
| 插表总数： | 1 |
| 馆藏号： | 本030101K/20094 |
| 开放日期： | 2021-06-06 |
谷歌
