本文主要以SOLO理论为基础分析了我国2013年15套高考物理试题。首先，笔者对“基于SOLO理论的物理知识内容SOLO认知层次界定标准”的全部内容进行了详细的学习，利用其分析了3套2011年各省市高考物理试题考查的物理内容和认知层次，将分析结果和标准制定者分析结果对比，算出信度约为0.96，说明笔者对SOLO标准的理解比较准确。然后，对SOLO标准做了适当补充，使其更趋完善。然后，利用SOLO标准对2013年高考物理试题做了如下的定量分析：1.整体考查情况：在物理内容方面，对力学部分知识的考查约占总体的一半，而对电磁学部分的考查约占总体的四分之一，其他学科和实验部分二者合计约占剩下的四分之一。在认知层次方面，考查以多元结构水平为最多，单一结构水平次之，关联结构水平最少；2.一致性分析：各省市试卷一致性系数的平均值在0.60～0.69之间，可见一致程度比较高；3.曲面图分析：各省市试卷考查的物理内容和认知层次有着不同的特点。

15 physics items of Collage Entrance Examination of 2013 were analyzed in this paper based on SOLO theory. Firstly, we studied “Determined standard of SOLO cognition level for physics content knowledge based on SOLO theory” for analyzing the different Collage Entrance Examination paper of physics subject tested in different provinces in 2011. We calculated that the reliability coefficient between analyzed result and the original one is about 0.96, which indicates that the author understanding of SOLO standard is correct. 1. Whole examination: In terms of physical content , knowledge of mechanics examine accounts for about half of the overall, knowledge of electromagnetism accounts a quarter of the overall and other disciplines and experimental examine the left. 2. Consistency analysis: average consistency coefficient of various papers of different provinces is in the range of 0.60 to 0.69, showing a relatively high degree of consistency. 3. Surface plot analysis: The physical content and cognitive levels tested in paper of different provinces have different characteristics.