在韩国历史上，朝鲜朝前后是中韩两国思想文化从收容到发生转变的重要历史阶段，各种文化形式见证了两国文化从一味的接受到本土的整合过程，老子思想就是其中之一，遗憾的是有关这一阶段两国老子思想文化关系的研究却极为鲜见。到目前为止，将朝鲜朝老子思想的传播以至如何本土化作为比较研究的对象，虽有文章涉猎，但还没有专门的研究论文出现。基于这种现状，本文从“朝鲜朝老子思想的传播及《道德经》注释书研究”这一角度切入，对朝鲜朝五大学者对《道德经》的植入与阐释进行群体研究。在对各阶段学者的构成及其思想分析的基础上，揭示了朝鲜朝《道德经》的植入演变的清晰轨迹及流变所蕴含的文化底蕴。本文除导论、结语外，正文部分共五章。　　　导论“朝鲜朝《道德经》释义的再认识”，按照目前学术通行惯例，扼要地介绍了当代中韩老学研究状况、本文选题意义及研究范围、本文所要达到的主要目标和创新点、本文主要的研究思路与方法。　　　第一章“古代朝鲜老子思想传入与接受回顾”介绍分析了老子思想传入朝鲜的时期，分为古朝鲜、三国统一时期、统一新罗、高丽时期不同阶段《道德经》是如何进入朝鲜，以至接受，接受的情况亦是如何等方面进行阐述。 第二章“朝鲜朝老子思想及撰写《道德经》注释书的背景”从社会政治情势、思想文化状况两方面分期描述了朝鲜朝老子思想本土化的历史土壤，在学者的异端观与异端说中孕育的老子哲学以及老子哲学在韩国本土学问上的萌芽进行论述。 第三章“老子思想的韩国化过程：《道德经》注释书的问世”本章分五个章节从李珥《醇言》朴世堂《新注道德经》徐命应《道德指归》李忠翊《椒园谈老》洪奭周《订老》具体说明《道德经》注释书的问世以及韩国化的过程。　　　第四章“近代朝鲜《道德经》释义书的个性与共性”朝鲜《道德经》注释书从内到外呈现出较大的趋同性，但在具体的理论生成、作品问世中仍然保留了鲜明的个性空间。本文从历史背景、相互的影响和对《道德经》历史价值继承有创新、新与旧合二为一的特性等方面逐一作了探　　　讨。　　　第五章“朝鲜朝老子思想与中国老子思想的异同点”本章从各自民族与传统文化的继承、中韩老学思想的师承、中韩老学与佛儒的不同关系等方面逐一作了探讨。　　　结语 “走过边缘化的朝鲜朝老学”从朝鲜朝诸家老学所表现出来的个案特征转换到她凸显出的时代特征，以此来考察整个朝鲜朝老学时，便可发现朝鲜朝各家各派的老学思想已然不是某个单一而孤立的存在，而是以立体、交叉、多元的势态不断衍进、发展的。　　　本文的新见体现在每一章节中，在全文中不仅阐释朝鲜朝《道德经》注释书，并且比较研究了五个朝鲜朝《道德经》注释书的个性和共性，还就其形成原因进行了探源。本文认为，在朝鲜半岛，中国传统思想文化的影响是巨大的。比较而言，儒学的影响是明显而强大的，而老子文化的影响是隐蔽的，但是，我们可以从朝鲜半岛的文学、文化中感受到老庄思想影响的深刻性。研究这一问题，对揭示老子思想在朝鲜半岛哲学和文学发展中的作用及变化、促进中外文化交流具有积极的文化意义和重要的学术价值。这也是本报告研究的重心所在，也是力图创新之所在。

In the history of Korea, Korea Dynasty is an important historical phase of transformation in cultures between China and Korea. Various forms of cultural witness the culture from the two countries accepted local integration process. Laozi's philosophy is one of it. It is regrettable that on this stage, it is extremely uncommon for the study of Theory of Lao tse of cultural relations between the two countries. To date, there were some articles relating the spread of Lao tse's philosophy and how it became localization, but there is no specific research paper on the topic.Based on the scenario, this article will study from the angle of “The Spread of Laozi's Thoughts in Korea Dynasty and the Study of the Commentary -- Tao Te Ching”. Study the implantation and interpretations of Tao Te Ching by five scholars. On the basis of the analysis of the formation and thought of masters, reveals clear path of the implantation and evolution of the Tao Te Ching and the rich deposit. In addition to an introduction and the conclusion of this article, there are four chapters in body part. Introduction—recognition of Korea Dynasty’s of Tao Te Ching’s interpretation. According to the customary in current academic, briefly describes the state of the contemporary study of Lao tse in China and Korea, significance and scope of the study topic, the main objectives to be achieved and innovation in this article, the main research thinking and method; analyze briefly the development of Theory of Lao tse in Korea Dynasty and cultural background of the debates. Chapter 1-- “Enter and accept Lao tse's philosophy in ancient Korea", which analyzes Lao tse's thoughts during the entering time. It describes how the Tao Te Ching enter into Korea Dynasty and accept it during different stages—Ancient Korea, unified the Three Kingdoms period, the unified Silla and Balhae . Chapter 2--" Lao tse's thought in Korea Dynasty and writing background of the Tao Te Ching’s commentary”, which described history of localization of Lao tse's philosophy from a socio - political situation, ideological and cultural conditions. From the scholar's view of heresy, it discussed Lao tse's philosophy in local Korea. Chapter 3-- “The process Theory of Lao tse to be Korean：the advent of the Tao Te Ching commentary” Five parts will be divided in this chapter, in which the publication of the reference of Tao Te Ching and the process of Korea are specified by Yul Gok“SunEon”, Park Sedang“New commentary of the Laotzu”,Seo Myungung“Essentials of DaoDe”,Lee ChoongIk“Cho-Won-Dam-Ro”and Hong Suk Ju“Jeong-Lao”. Chapter 4--“Personality and the common points in Tao Te Ching’s commentary in Modern Korea”--the reference of Tao Te Ching, Korea Dynasty has made way for a huge convergence; However, the distinctive personalization still remains in the generation of exact theory, as well as the publication of works. Different understandings and disparate theoretical systems result in the personalization. In this chapter, the universality is explored detailed from the historical background and effects to the combination of innovation and tradition in the historical value of Tao Te Ching Chapter 5--"Similarities of Lao tse’s thoughts in Korea Dynasty and China"-- Any country with a long rather than short civilization in any time in history, fusion cannot be the whole but parts between local culture and foreign culture. It is the same for Theory of Lao tse in Korea Dynasty. This chapter studied from their respective national and traditional cultural inheritance, succession of Theory of Lao tse between China and Korea Dynasty, and the relationship between Lao tse’s thoutht and Confusion. Conclusion--"Across the edge of Theory of Lao tse in Korea Dynasty”--Investigate the entire Theory of Lao tse in Korea from individual characteristics to characteristics of the time we can see that Theory of Lao tse in Korea is not a single isolated existence, but continued to develop multiply in dimensional, cross, pluralistic trend. This paper covers new ideas in every chapter. In this article, not only the commentary of Tao Te Ching in Korea Dynasty is illustrated, but also the comparative study of Individuality and commonness of the commentaries of Tao Te Ching in five Korea Dynasties, as well as, looking into the formation causes. This article suggests that Chinese traditional culture has huge influence on Korea peninsula. Comparatively speaking, the influence of Confucianism is obvious and strong, and the influence of Lao culture is not. However, we can feel the profound influence of thought of Lao tse and Zhuang Zi from the Korean peninsula literary and culture. The study of this problem has positive cultural significance and important academic value to the reveal of how the thought of Lao tse impacts the Korean peninsula philosophy and literary development, as well as the facilitation of sino-foreign cultural exchange. This is also the focus of this paper and the innovative part.