对于每个个体而言，早期的家庭教育是人生发展极其重要的初始环境，而父母的教养方式对这个环境中有决定性影响。家庭教养方式文献查阅表明，当前家庭教养方式的测量工具均聚焦教养者，而忽略了被教养者的视角。然而，De（2016）发现青少年和家长对于家庭教养方式的接受程度会对青少年的社会适应性以及健康发展产生显著影响。此外，作者过去两年来跟随导师开展青少年领导力发展实践项目时亦发现，青少年和家长对教养方式及其效果的感知存在严重偏差。因此，本研究选择在前人家庭教养方式量表的基础上，从教养者和被教养者的双重视角出发，编制青少年家庭教养方式量表。 本论文包含三个子研究：研究一，通过20对家长和青少年的半结构化配对访谈和编码分析，探究家庭教养方式的维度以及父母和青少年对家庭教养方式感知差异形成的原因；研究二，从教养者和被教养者两个角度出发编制家庭教养方式量表。其中，教养者角度主要测量父母教养行为，被教养者角度主要测量青少年对家长教养行为的接受度。预测试和正式施测分别回收有效问卷211份和370份；研究三，探究青少年对教养行为的接受度在父母教养行为与亲子亲合之间的调节作用，进一步验证家庭教养方式测量中引入被教养者的必要性和可靠性。相关研究结果如下： 1、家庭教养方式量表总共包含44道题目，由教养行为分量表（21道）和教养行为接受度分量表（21道）组成，均包含情感支持（6题），规则引导（3题）、武断臆测（4题），控制保护（5题）、自由准许（4题）等五个维度。教养行为分量表和教养行为接受度分量表各个维度的α系数均在.80以上，分半信度均大于.75，具有良好的信度，验证性因素分析结果表明，测验结构效度良好。 2、以亲子亲合作为效标的效度检验发现，在教养行为分量表和教养行为接受度分量表中，情感支持、规则引导、自由准许都对亲子亲合有良好正向预测作用，武断臆测对亲子亲合有显著的负向预测作用，控制保护维度对亲子亲合预测作用不显著，但是父母教养行为与孩子对教养行为接受度之间的差值（差异度）对亲子关系均有显著的预测作用，情感支持差异度（r=-.418，p<.01）、规则引导差异度（r=-.122，p<.05）、武断臆测差异度（r=-.278, p<.01）、控制保护差异度（r=-.234，p<.01）、自由准许差异度（r=-.275，p<.01）与亲子亲合有显著负相关。 3、青少年（对家长的）情感支持/规则引导/控制保护/自主准许教养方式的接受度，在父母的情感支持（B=.74**，p<.01）/规则引导（B =.40*，p<.05）/武断臆测（B =.32**，p<.01）/控制保护（B =.53**，p<.01）/自主准许（B =.07**，p<.01）教养行为与亲子亲合之间起调节作用，说明青少年对该教养行为的接受度越高，该教养行为能够更好的促进亲子亲合。

For each individual, early family education is an extremely important initial environment for life development, and the parenting style has a decisive influence on this environment. Literature review on parenting style shows that current parenting style measurement tools focus on the parenting style, but ignore the perspective of the educated. However, De (2016) found that teenagers' and parents' acceptance of family parenting style would have a significant impact on their social adaptability and healthy development. In addition, when the author carried out the youth leadership development practice project with the tutor in the past two years, he also found that there was a serious deviation in the perception of the parenting style and its effect among the teenagers and their parents. Therefore, on the basis of the previous family parenting style scale, this study chooses to compile the family parenting style scale for teenagers from the dual perspectives of the educated and the educated. This paper consists of three sub-studies. First, through 20 pairs of semi-structured paired interviews and coding analysis between parents and teenagers, it explores the dimensions of parenting style and the reasons for the differences in parents' and teenagers' perception of parenting style. The second research is to develop the parenting style scale from the perspective of the educated and the educated. Among them, the perspective of educationalist mainly measures the parenting behavior, and the perspective of educated mainly measures the teenagers' acceptance of parenting behavior.211 valid questionnaires and 370 valid questionnaires were collected respectively in predictive test and formal test. Research 3 explores the moderating effect of teenagers' acceptance of parenting behavior on parental parenting behavior and parent-child bonding, and further verifies the necessity and reliability of introducing the educated into the measurement of parenting style. Relevant research results are as follows: 1, family upbringing scale contains a total of 44 questions, by nurturing behavior subscales acceptance (21) and breeding behavior subscales (21), all include emotional support (6), the rules guiding question (3), make assumptions (4), control protection (5 questions), free to allow (4 items) and so on five dimensions. The coefficients of each dimension of the parenting behavior subscale and the parenting behavior acceptance subscale were all above.80 and greater than.75, with good reliability. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the test structure validity was good. 2, parent-child close cooperation for the underlying validity inspection found that the acceptance behavior subscales and child-rearing behavior subscales, rules of emotional support, guidance, freedom to allow for parent-child affinity have good positive prediction function, make assumptions for parent-child affinity have significant negative prediction function, control protection dimension of parent-child affinity forecasting effect was not significant, but parents upbringing behavior and children to parenting behavior difference (difference) between acceptance of parent-child relationship have significant prediction effect, emotional support difference degree (r = -. 418, p <.01), rules, guide the difference degree (r = -. 122,P <.05), degree of arbitrary difference (r=-.278, p<.01), degree of control protection difference (r=-.234, p<.01), degree of freedom permission difference (r=-.275, p<.01) were significantly negatively correlated with parent-child bonding. 3, adolescents (parent) emotional support/guidance/control protection/independent rules to allow the acceptance of the parenting, in my parents' emotional support (B =. 74 * *, p <.01)/rules guide (B = 40 *, p <.05)/make assumptions (B = 32 * *, p <.01)/control protection (B = 53 * *, p <.01)/independent permission (B = 07 * *, p <. 01) breeding behavior and regulating role between parent-child affinity, suggests that the youth of the breeding behaviour of acceptance is higher, the breeding behavior can better promote parent-child affinity.