中文题名: | 审慎的导航——论新时期以来袁可嘉的现代派文学研究 |
姓名: | |
学科代码: | 050101 |
学科专业: | |
学生类型: | 硕士 |
学位: | 文学硕士 |
学位年度: | 2013 |
校区: | |
学院: | |
研究方向: | 文艺美学 |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师单位: | |
提交日期: | 2013-06-09 |
答辩日期: | 2013-05-25 |
外文题名: | PRUDENT NAVIGATION |
中文摘要: |
本文尝试考察袁可嘉新时期以来的现代派研究,分析他对西方现代派的研究和对中国现代派文学史的梳理,由此探讨袁可嘉新时期以来现代派研究的独特性和复杂性。全文由前言、正文三节和结语组成。前言部分介绍了新时期西方现代派文学的传播语境,并在总结前人研究成果的基础上阐明了本选题的初衷和行文思路。第一节聚焦于新时期以来袁可嘉对“西方现代派”的研究。他凭借十分隐晦的言说,谨慎地表达自己对西方现代派的赞赏。他通过宽泛的时期界定,笼统的思想特征分析,刻画现代派作家政治正确的形象,辨析现代派文学与种种“反动”文学的关系,细致解读现代派文本的艺术性,不断强调现代派的积极意义,极力减少对现代派弊端的分析等做法,有策略而又安全地推进新时期初西方现代派文学在中国的深入传播进程。第二节选取在现代派论争中出现的几对关键词,考察袁可嘉在“现代派与现实主义”、“现代派与传统”、“现代派与现代化”等问题上的独特见解。通过与同期学者对比,发现袁可嘉始终积极促进现实主义与现代派的共融,强调现代派对传统的继承,呼吁中国现代化与中国现代派的和谐共生,为八十年代中国现代派创作的发展提供了良好的理论准备。第三节主要归纳袁可嘉对中国现代派历史的多重梳理。一是通过强调人民性,袁可嘉重塑九叶诗人的文学史形象;二是通过“中国式现代主义”这一概念的提出,将“五四”至新时期中国现代派串联起来,并对其思想和艺术特征做了初步描述;最后通过整体的历史观照,将西方现代派在中国的传播史,尤其是中国现代派的创作史完整地勾勒出来。经过这一系列努力,中国的“现代主义”终于在某种意义上成为与现实主义并驾齐驱的合法化的文学思潮了。 结语部分对袁可嘉新时期以来现代派文学研究予以总结,归纳袁可嘉治学的独特性。认为这一时期他的现代派研究显示出一个现代学者自觉的启蒙意识,严谨的治学精神,理性的现实判断;但他中性表述的背后暗含着对其时主流政治意识形态的妥协,局限了学术研究的深入,不得不让人惋惜。袁可嘉的选择不会更改,但对今人或可产生启示:学者只有具备无私无畏的纯正学术勇气,才能在学术道路上走得更远。
﹀
|
外文摘要: |
This paper tries to study on Yuan Kejia’s modernism research in the new period. By analyzing his viewpoint on western modernism and his summary of Chinese modernist literature history, we would find out Yuan Kejia’s uniqueness and complexity.The paper includes an introduction, three chapters and a conclusion. The introduction has summarized the previous studies and given a clear illustration on the purpose for the selection of this topic and the outline of this paper. The first chapter has mainly focused on the Yuan Kejia’s studies of “western modernism” since the new period. He has obscurely and prudently expressed his appreciation towards western modernism, and promoted the spread of western modernist literature in China strategically and safely. Chapter Two has selected some key words emerged in the debate of modernism and investigated in the unique observation of Yuan Kejia on the problem of “modernism and realism”, “modernism and tradition”, “modernism and modernization”. Chapter Three has concluded the analysis of Yuan Kejia in the history of Chinese modernism. He re-portrayed the “JiuYe School” in the literary history and found historian origins for the modernism creations. Yuan Kejia depictured the whole process of the spread of western modernism in China, especially the entire creation history of Chinese modernism. Through all these efforts, he made eventually Chinese modernism a rival of realism.The final conclusion has summarized the studies done by Yuan Kejia on the modernist literature since the new period and made a sum up of its own uniqueness of Yuan Kejia’s way of study. A peaceful mood, such prudent layouts and perfect academic accomplishments have made Yuan Kejia’s work quite valuable academically. His complicated and contradictory emotions towards the modernism are worth for us thinking about.
﹀
|
参考文献总数: | 69 |
馆藏号: | 硕050101/1311 |
开放日期: | 2013-06-09 |