法院调解在我国的纠纷解决机制中占有非常重要的位置，其对合理利用司法资源、调整利益冲突及预防或减少纠纷发生起到了非常重要的作用。但不可否认的是，在实践中，双方当事人恶意串通，进行虚假调解，欺骗法院的案件屡见不鲜并有不断蔓延的趋势。这类虚假调解案件通常会侵害第三人的合法权益并严重影响司法的权威与公正。2012年修订的《民事诉讼法》确立了检察机关对调解书的检察监督权，但损害第三人利益的情形并不包含在内。然而，第三人通过现有的救济制度并不能很好地维护自身合法权益，但检察机关的地位使得检察监督权能在保护第三人合法权益中发挥独特作用，因此建议将检察机关对调解书的监督范围予以扩大。

The court mediation occupies a very important position in the controversy settlement. It plays a very important role in the rational use of judicial resources, the adjustment of interest conflicts and preventing the occurrence of disputes. However, in practice, it is often seen that the litigant parties collude with each other maliciously to direct a false mediation in order to cheat judges. This type of false mediation cases often damage the rights and interests of the third person and impact the judicial authority seriously. The new civil procedure law established the procurators’ supervision on mediation, but this situation is not included. At this time, third people through the existing relief system can’t protect their legitimate rights and interests. Thus, it is recommended that the scope of the procuratorial organ’s supervision about the mediation shall be expanded.