代词在句子理解和维持篇章连贯性方面有重要作用，研究者发现句法、语义、语用等要素都会影响代词的加工。不少研究者对于动词隐含因果这一语义特征对代词加工的影响颇为关注，并针对母语者进行了丰富的实证研究，并对动词隐含因果会影响代词回指为主语或宾语这一结论达成共识，但这一因素对汉语二语者代词加工影响情况如何还缺乏实证研究。同时，作为一种语篇信息，连词提供了上下句之间的逻辑关系线索，可以帮助二语者维持话语连贯性和建立话语表征，这一因素是否也会对汉语二语者代词加工产生影响，语篇信息和语义信息如何共同影响二语者的代词解析，二语者代词加工和母语者的差异是什么，这些问题还有待进一步研究讨论。基于此，本研究从已有的动词隐含因果对代词影响的研究成果和代词加工的相关理论出发，借鉴以往研究范式中的句子补全实验任务，并结合实验后的半结构化访谈，探究动词隐含因果义和连词“因为”对汉语二语者代词解析的影响，并通过与母语者进行对比，了解二者在代词加工过程中对语义、语篇线索的识别和使用情况。

本研究先后进行了两个实验，考察在不同语境条件下，动词隐含因果义对汉语母语者和二语者代词解析的影响，实验中还通过操纵句子补全任务中连词“因为”在句子中的存现与否来考察连词对动词隐含因果义的影响作用，并通过与母语者结果的对比，重点讨论了动词隐含因果义对母语者和二语者代词解析影响的差异和共性，并对所调查的汉语动词的隐含因果义进行了分析，结合对实验产出句的分析，归纳了二语者代词解析和话语延续的特点。

研究中，实验一采用句子补全任务，给定句式为“NP1+V+NP2，因为他（她）......”，考察二语者对代词偏向主语还是宾语的解析结果和母语者相比有什么差异和共性。为了进一步考察动词隐含因果义对代词解析的影响是独立实现的还是受制于有明确语篇衔接关系的语境条件，本文还设计了实验二，采用与实验一相同的实验任务，不同之处在于删除了实验句中的连词“因为”，改为“NP1+V+NP2，他（她）......”，旨在考察没有因果关系连词时被试的代词解析倾向性，并对比母语者和二语者在实验一和实验二的结果。

研究结果发现：（1）动词隐含因果义对汉语高级二语学习者的代词解析存在影响，具体表现为，在有连词“因为”的情况下，在含有主语型动词的句子中，二语者倾向于将歧义代词解析为主语；在宾语型动词句子中，二语者的代词解析表现出宾语倾向。代词解析和动词语义倾向体现出一致性。但与母语者相比，二语者的一致性较低。（2）在没有连词II“因为”的情况下，和结果（1）相比，二语者的代词解析与动词语义倾向保持一致的概率下降。这和前人研究中发现的二语者在代词解析中表现的首次提及偏好效应不同，本研究中，二语者的代词解析表现出了较强的回指宾语的倾向，即倾向于从接受动作或受到动作影响的主体角度出发，对动作所造成的结果进行说明。母语者结果和二语者有所不同，仍呈现出代词解析倾向和动词语义倾向一致的结果，但没有连词“因为”的语境条件下的一致性低于存在连词“因为”的语境条件。（3）动词隐含因果义对母语者和二语者的代词解析存在影响，受到连词“因为”的调节作用，连词“因为”的存在会增强这一影响效果。二语者对于动词隐含因果这一语义信息的使用能力和母语者相比较弱。

本研究采用定性和定量相结合的研究方法，为了解语义和语篇信息对汉语二语者代词解析过程提供了实验证据，丰富了动词隐含因果义对代词解析影响的相关研究。

Pronouns play an important role in sentence comprehension and maintaining chapter coherence. Many studies have been conducted to discuss the factors which affected the processing of pronouns, including syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic factors. Researchers have paid much attention to the influence of the semantic feature of verb implied causality on pronoun processing, and have conducted a wealth of empirical studies on native speakers, and reached a consensus on the conclusion that verb implied causality can affect the subject or object of pronoun anagram. However, there is a lack of empirical studies on the influence of this factor on pronoun processing of Chinese second speakers. At the same time, as a kind of textual information, conjunctions provide clues of the logical relationship between the next sentence, which can help second speakers maintain discourse coherence and establish discourse representation. The academic debate on the complex process of pronoun processing, especially whether pronoun processing in bilinguals is consistent with that of native speakers, has not yet stopped. While there is a consensus that the semantic tendency of verb-implicit causality affects pronouns referring back to the subject or object, new questions keep surfacing: Will this factor also affect pronoun processing by Chinese second speakers? How does this effect manifest itself in bilinguals? Does the conjunction in the experimental task play a moderating role in the effect of verb-implicit causality on pronoun resolution to jointly affect pronoun parsing by second speakers? What are the differences between pronoun processing by second speakers and native speakers?These questions remain to be discussed in depth. Based on this, starting from the existing research results on the influence of implicit causality of verbs on pronouns and related theories on pronoun processing, this study learned from the sentence completion experiment task in previous research paradigms, combined with semi-structured interviews after the experiment, to explore the influence of implicit causality of verbs and the conjunction "because" on pronoun parsing by Chinese second speakers, and compared with native speakers. To understand their recognition and use of semantic and textual cues in the process of pronoun processing.

IV Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of verb implicit causality on the pronoun parsing of native and bilingual speakers in different contexts, and to investigate the effect of part-of-speech connectives on verb implicit causality by manipulating the presence of absence of the part-of-speech connective "because" in the sentence-completion task. In experiment 1, the sentence completion task was adopted, and the sentence formula was given as "NP1+V+P2, because he (she)......". To investigate the differences and commonalities in the analysis results of pronoun preference for subject or object between second speakers and nativespeakers. 

In order to further investigate whether the influence of implicit causal meaning of verbs on pronoun analysis is realized independently or subject to contextual conditions with clear textual cohesion, this paper also designs experiment 2, which adopts the same experimental task as experiment 1, except that the conjunction "because" in the experimental sentence is deleted and replaced with "NP1+V+NP2, he (she)......". To investigate pronoun parsing tendency of subjects without causal conjunctions, and to compare the results of native speakers and second speakers in experiment 1 and experiment 2. The results of this study show the following findings:(1) verb-implicit causality has an effect on the pronoun resolution of of advanced L2 learners. Specifically, in the case of the conjunction "because", in sentences containing subject-type verbs, L2 learners tend to parse ambiguous pronouns in the main language; In object verb sentences, the pronoun parsing of second speakers shows an object tendency. Pronoun analysis and verb semantic tendency show consistency. However, second speakers are less consistent than native speakers. (2) In the absence of the conjunction "because", compared with the result (1), the probability of the second speaker's pronoun parsing being consistent with the semantic tendency of the verb decreases. This is different from the first reference preference effect found in previous studies. In this study, second speakers' pronoun resolution shows a strong tendency to refer to anaphora objects, that is, they tend to explain the results caused by actions from the perspective of the subject receiving or affected by the actions. The results of native speakers are different from those of second speakers. The results of pronoun parsing tendency and verb semantic tendency are still the same, but the consistency of the context condition without the conjunction "because" is lower than that of the context condition with the conjunction "because". (3) Implicit causality of verbs has an influence on pronoun parsing of native speakers and second speakers, mediated by the conjunction"because", and the presence of the conjunction "because" will enhance this effect. The ability of second speakers to use the semantic information of verb implied cause and effect is weaker than that of native speakers.

This study uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods to provide experimental evidence for understanding the semantic and textual information on the pronoun parsing process of Chinese second speakers, and to enrich the relevant research on the influence of implicit causal meaning of verbs on pronoun parsing.