中文题名: | 中小学生一般认知能力与数学成绩的关系及其干预的脑机制 |
姓名: | |
保密级别: | 公开 |
论文语种: | 中文 |
学科代码: | 040202 |
学科专业: | |
学生类型: | 博士 |
学位: | 理学博士 |
学位类型: | |
学位年度: | 2020 |
校区: | |
学院: | |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师单位: | |
提交日期: | 2021-05-08 |
答辩日期: | 2020-08-23 |
外文题名: | The relationghsip between general cognitive abilities and primary and secondary school students’ mathematical achievement, intervention and the neural mechanisms |
中文关键词: | |
中文摘要: |
数学学习对中小学生心理发展、个人成长以及国家的科技人才培养等都具有重要的意义。随着认知神经科学的发展,从认知角度揭示学生数学成绩的影响因素,发展相应的干预手段并揭示其神经机制得到了越来越多的研究者的重视。虽然以往研究探究了一些影响数学成绩的认知因素,但仍然存在一些不足:首先,对于一般认知能力,还没有清晰和一致的界定, 尚不清楚一般认知能力与数学认知能力之间的关系,以及两者如何共同影响数学成绩;其次, 目前也还不明确随着年龄的增长,中小学生各项认知能力和数学成绩之间关系的变化模式; 第三,基于数学学习的认知神经机制的数学学习能力提升、数学学习障碍干预等方面的研究大多采用实验室干预的方法,从训练时间、效果、可迁移性以及生态学效度等方面都还有待进一步验证。针对上述问题,本研究采用大样本、生态化的研究思路,通过三个研究系统揭示一般认知能力和数学成绩的关系,发展基于认知能力的干预方案并揭示其脑机制。 研究一发展和验证了基于计算机和游戏化的一般认知能力测查方式,并对 10660 名 7-14岁中小学生进行了 9 项认知能力测查。结果发现:(1)本研究涉及的各项认知任务都具有较高的信度和效度;(2)各项一般认知能力,包括空间位置短时记忆、言语短时记忆、反应时、工作记忆和推理能力等,都在中小学阶段(7-14 岁)快速提高;(3)各个年龄段,男生在多物体追踪、图形归纳推理、简单反应时任务上的表现均好于女生,在 13 岁和 14 岁时复杂记忆广度也大于女生。而各年龄时期的女生在言语记忆广度、反向言语记忆广度和选择反应时任务上成绩均高于同龄男生;(4)一般认知能力存在领域一般性和领域特殊性的结构特点。 研究二进一步考察了一般认知能力与数学认知能力的关系,以及两者如何共同影响数学成绩,结果发现:(1)数量加工能力、数学计算能力和空间认知能力都在 7-14 岁之间快速发展。男生在各年龄阶段数学计算能力,以及 14 岁时的空间认知能力上要显著高于女生,而女生在 8 岁、9 岁、12 岁时的数量感知能力,以及 8 岁、9 岁时的空间认知能力上优于男生;(2)数学认知能力各成分之间存在中等程度相关,同时也与一般认知能力之间存在中等程度相关。(3)一般认知能力和数学认知能力总体上对数学成绩的预测度随着年龄上升而显著提高。数学认知能力比一般认知能力能更好的预测数学成绩。 研究三考察了认知能力训练对数学成绩的影响及其脑机制。基于已有文献和研究一、研究二的结果,我们以工作记忆为训练目标,对 8-9 岁的小学生开展了为期 2 个月的干预训练。通过对比实验组(17 名被试)与性别、年龄和认知能力匹配的控制组(17 名被试)训练前后在一般认知能力、数学成绩的差异,以及训练前后的脑成像数据的比较,研究结果发现:(1)工作记忆训练可以显著提高空间工作记忆、反向言语短时记忆、复杂记忆广度和多物体追踪等一般认知能力任务的成绩,但复杂记忆广度和多物体追踪任务上实验组和前后测的交互作用没有达到统计显著水平。训练没有提高被试的瑞文推理能力和数学认知能力;(2)通过比较两组在训练前后的期末考试成绩,我们发现训练组的数学成绩训练前后差异显著,训练组别与前后测的交互作用显著;(3)从脑机制上,工作记忆训练显著提高了实验组右侧额中回的灰质体积及其功能连接,而且训练前后灰质体积的变化与被试空间短时记忆能力的变化存在显著的正相关,与反向言语短时记忆能力变化的相关边缘显著。 这些结果综合说明,认知能力是影响学生数学成绩的重要因素,一般认知能力与数学认知能力共同影响学生的数学成绩,数学认知能力的预测度相对更高。对中小学生进行认知训练可以显著提高与数学相关的一般认知能力和数学成绩,并改善大脑额中回的灰质体积。这些研究结果加深了我们对于数学成绩影响因素的认识,所验证的测查工具和认知训练方案也为相应的测查和干预提供了方法上的基础,干预训练为我们发展基于认知能力的数学学习诊断和干预方案提供了理论基础。 |
外文摘要: |
Mathematical learning is important for student’s psychological development, school achievement and the training of workers in science, techonology and engineering 。 With the development of cognitive neuroscience, researchers have shown growing interests in discovering the cognitive factors that contribute to students’ mathematical achievement, and developing novel interventions and examinining the underlying neural mechanisms. Althought the various cognitive factors affecting mathematical achievement have been examined by existing studies, few studies have examined and compared these factors in a single large study, thus leaving several important questions unaddressed. First, there lacks a clear and consistent definition of general cognitive ability, and the relationship between general cognitive ability and mathematical cognitive ability, and their relationship with mathematical achievement have not been clearly understood; Second, it is largely unknown how the contributions of general cognitive abilities and mathematical cognitive abilities to mathematical achievement would change with development and school grade; Third, most of the current interventions to improve mathematical learning and learning difficulites are lab-based, which severely limits the duration, efficacy, transfer and ecological validate of these methods. To address these questions, the current study, using large sample and ecological approaches, to systematically examine the relationship between general cognitive abilities, mathematical cognitive abilities and mathematical achievement, and to develop cognitive interventions and uncover the neural mechinisms. Study One used 9 computerized and gamified cognitive tasks to test 10660 primary and second students aged between 7-14 years old. We found that: (1) all cognitive tests showed high test-retest reliablities; (2) all cognitive abilities, including spatial short-term memory (SSTM), forward and backward verbal short-term memory (VSTM), reaction time (RT) and reasoning, are developing rapidly between 7 to 14 years old; (3) Boys outperformed girls in multiple object tracking (MOT), figural inductive reasoning (FIR), simple reaction task (SRT), and at age 13 and 14 in complex memory span (CMS), whereas girls outperformaned boys in forward and backward VSTM, and choice reaction time (CRT); (4) there exisits domain-specific and domain-genernal architecture of general cognitive abilities, and factor analysis using bifactor rotation revealed a general factor (G factor) and two specific factors (S factor), including RT and VSTM. Study Two, based on Study One, further examined the development of mathematical abilities and its reliationship with genernal cognitive abilities, and how they jointly affected students’ mathematical achievement. Our results showed that: (1) All mathematical cogntiive abilities, including number comparison (NC), mental calculation (MC) and spatial mental rotation (MR), developed rapidly during age 7 to 14. Boys are better than girls on mental calucalation, and at age 14 mental rotation, whereas girls are better than boys on number comparison at age 8, 9, and 12, and on mental rotation on age 8 and 9; (2) The mathematical cognitive abilities were moderately correlated with each other and also showed moderate correlations with general cognitive abilities. In particular, number comparison was correlated with various working memory tasks, mental calculation was correlated with working memory and reaction time tasks, and mental rotation was correlated with figural inductive reasoning task; (3) the contribution of cognitive abilities to mathematical achievement increased with school grade; Compared to general cognitive abilities, mathemathical cognitive abilities contributed significantly higher to mathematical achievement, with mental calculation made biggest contribution, followed by mental rotation, whereas the contribution of number comparison was not significant; For general cognitive abilities, spatial short-term memory and configurnal inductive reason made high contributions. Having revealed the cognitive factors that contributed to mathematical achievement, Study Three used functional Magnetical imaging and cognitive training to examine the effect the working memory training on math-related cognitive abilities, and the underlying neural mehcanisms. Eighteen (Experimental group) and seventeen (Control group) age matched 3rd and 4th grade primary students were recruited in this study. The experimental group were trained on several spatial working memory tasks for 2 months, using home-based, computerized, adaptive cognitive games. We found that (1) compared to the control group, working memory training could significantly improve training group’s performance on spatial working memory, backward verbal short-term memory, complex memory span and multiple object tracking, although the training group by test (pre vs. post) interaction was not significant for the later two tasks. Training also improved subjects’ mathematical achievement, but did not improve subjects’ Raven reasoning performance and mathematical cognitive abilities; (2) Working memory significantly increased the gray matter volumn and functional connectivity in the right middle prefrontal cortex, and the amount of increase was significantly positively correlated with subjects’ improvement in spatial short-term memory, and marginally significantly correlated with subjects’ improvement in backward verbal short-term memory. Taken together, our study suggests that cognitive abilities are important factors that contributed to primary and secondary students’ mathematical achievement. The general cognitive abilities and mathematical cognitive abilities are moderately correlated; both contributed significantly to mathematical achievement, with greater contributions from mathematical cognitive abilities. Working memory training could significantly improve subjects’ general cognitive abilities that contributed to mathematical achievement and increase the gray matter volume in the prefrontal cortex. These results deepen our understanding on the factors that contribute to mathematical achievement, and provide theoretical basis for the development of cognitive diagnosis and intervention of mathematical learning. The assessment tools and intervention programs developed in this study are ready to be transformed to educational practices. |
馆藏地: | 图书馆学位论文阅览区(主馆南区三层BC区) |
馆藏号: | 博040202/20015 |
开放日期: | 2022-05-08 |