| 中文题名： | 被家暴妇女反杀案量刑研究 |
| 姓名： | |
| 保密级别： | 公开 |
| 论文语种： | 中文 |
| 学科代码： | 035101 |
| 学科专业： | |
| 学生类型： | 硕士 |
| 学位： | 法律硕士 |
| 学位类型： | |
| 学位年度： | 2021 |
| 校区： | |
| 学院： | |
| 研究方向： | 刑法学 |
| 第一导师姓名： | |
| 第一导师单位： | |
| 提交日期： | 2021-06-25 |
| 答辩日期： | 2021-06-06 |
| 外文题名： | Sentencing Study In Battered Women Who Kill |
| 中文关键词： | |
| 外文关键词： | Domestic violence ; Kill ; Intentional homicide ; Battered women syndrome ; Sentencing |
| 中文摘要： |
近年来，被家暴妇女反杀案呈现出较为明显的“同案不同判”现象，量刑整体呈现出失衡的特点，具体表现为量刑悬殊和量刑畸重，损害了司法的权威性与公正性，不利于被家暴妇女的人权保护。该现象具有多方面的成因，如传统的以男性视角为基础的正当防卫理论难以适用，忽略了《关于依法办理家庭暴力案件的意见》第20条中对被家暴的女性罪犯从轻处罚的规定，酌定从轻幅度具有较大的自由裁量空间，以及法官的个体差异、舆论推动等非案件本身的因素。针对该类案件量刑的症结，我们有必要在被家暴妇女反杀案量刑轻缓化方面进行深入探讨，以期更好地保护被家暴妇女的权利。基于比较法的视角，我国可以从域外的司法实践中汲取合理的经验和借鉴，结合中国的国情，即使无法用受虐妇女综合症、正当防卫等作为出罪路径，在量刑上亦应当汲取国外有益的立法实践之精神，对被家暴妇女作出从轻、减轻甚至无罪的人性化处理。为此，我国司法需要结合本国的国情，对正当防卫的时间要件和限度要件进行合理地把握；积极适用《关于依法办理家庭暴力案件的意见》第20条的规定，对酌定量刑情节的幅度作出合理规制，合理运用精神异常作为量刑轻缓化的抗辩理由；将被害人过错视为法定量刑情节；出台最新的指导案例；加强对被家暴妇女的公力救济等等。
﹀
|
| 外文摘要： |
In recent years, the cases of battered woman who kill in domestic violence show obvious phenomenon of "different sentences in the same case", and the overall sentencing shows unbalanced characteristics, which is manifested in the disparity and severe sentencing, which undermines the authority and impartiality of the judiciary, and is not good to protect the human rights of battered women. There are many reasons for this phenomenon, such as the traditional self-defense theory based on the male perspective is difficult to apply, ignoring the provisions of Article 20 of the Opinions on Handling Domestic Violence Cases on the lighter punishment of battered women who kill, and having a large space for the discretionary circumstances of sentencing, other non-case factors such as the individual differences of judges, the promotion of public opinion. China's judicature can draw reasonable reference from foreign judicial practice through the perspective of comparative law. In China's national conditions, even if Battered Woman Syndrome and self-defense can't be used as the way to exempt crime, we should learn from the spirit of foreign beneficial legislative practice in sentencing, and make a lighter, mitigated or even innocent humane treatment for battered women who kill. Therefore, in consideration of China’s own conditions, the justice needs to reasonably evaluate the time and equality elements of self-defense; Actively apply the provisions of Article 20 of "Opinions on Handling Domestic Violence Cases", rationally regulate the amplitude of discretionary sentencing circumstances, and rationally use mental disorder as a defense for mitigating sentencing; Regard victim's fault as legal sentencing circumstances; Introduce the latest guidance cases; And strengthen public succour for women who have been subjected to domestic violence, etc.
﹀
|
| 参考文献总数： | 52 |
| 馆藏号： | 硕035101/21078 |
| 开放日期： | 2022-06-25 |
谷歌
