教师以“人”为工作对象，他们的工作是教育年轻一代，他们的情感可以影响学生的全面发展。更具体地说，教师的情绪对课堂氛围和学生的学习效率起着至关重要的作用。他们需要调节自己的情绪，以帮助教学过程顺利进行，并帮助自己更好地投入工作。本研究采用定量和定性相结合的混合方法，旨在调查教师的情感劳动和工作投入的程水平并探究两者之间的关系。本研究针对52名高中英语教师，使用情绪劳动问卷和工作投入量表收集定量数据，选取3名典型研究对象进行访谈，收集定性数据，分析高中英语教师情绪劳动和工作投入度的水平以及两者的关系。经过线性相关分析，回归分析和质性分析发现：1）高中英语教师的情绪劳动水平相对较高，他们使用深层表演策略的频率最高，使用表层表演策略的频率最低。 2）高中英语教师工作投入度高，精力充沛， 勇敢执着，积极向上，乐于奉献。 3）高中英语教师的工作投入水平与深层表演和真实表达呈正向弱相关，表层表演和工作投入水平不相关。更YI，深度表演和真实表达对工作投入有显著预测作用，而表层表演对工作投入没有显著预测作用。

Teachers work with humans and educate the younger generation, and their emotions may possibly influence the development and complement of the students. To be more specific, teachers’ emotions play a vitally important role in the class atmosphere and students’ learning efficiency. They need to regulate their emotions to help the teaching procedure go on smoothly and help themselves better engage in their work. This paper aims to use a mixed-methods approach which involves both quantitative and qualitative data sources to find out the emotional labor and work engagement levels of the teachers and find the relationship between the two variables. The Emotional Labor Questionnaire and the Work Engagement Scale were used to collect quantitative data from 52 high school English teachers and 3 typical participants were chosen to interview to collect qualitative data. After the linear correlation analysis, regression analysis, and qualitative analysis, it was found that 1) high school English teachers have a relatively high level of emotional labor and they use the strategy of deep acting the most and they use the strategy of surface acting the least. 2) high school English teachers have a high level of work engagement, and they are full of energy, brave and persistent, positive and contributive. 3) Deep acting and genuine acting of the high school English teachers are positively but weakly correlated with their work engagement while surface acting and work engagement of high school English teachers is uncorrelated. More specifically, deep acting and genuine acting have a significant predictive impact on work engagement while surface acting has no significant predictive effect on work engagement.