我国的减刑工作现存问题很多，司法程序上存在诸多漏洞，这不仅不利于构建社会主义特色的法制社会，更与“以人为本”的原则相悖。笔者认为，应借鉴国外立法及行刑过程中的先进理念，摒弃糟粕，充分考虑减刑申请当事人（罪犯）的合法权益，保障罪犯在公平、公正、公开的环境下积极改造，以现实悔改表现、人身危险性降低为前提，获得减刑奖励；打破任何消极的人为阻碍，强调广义的监察功能，保障监督无障碍、惩处无顾虑，构建一个实体法和程序法合二为一的良性平台，让减刑工作在阳光下顺畅进行。本文分为五个部分。第一部分，从减刑司法设置、幅度上总体比较国内外减刑制度实质条件、立法模式的现状、特征，并阐述了对我国的司法启示。第二部分，笔者重点指出了目前在减刑实际操作中存在的问题，就司法界对于“可以减刑”、“应当减刑”的依据对应悔改表现的量度的争议阐述了自己的观点，对现有减刑的申报、裁定机制存在的问题进行了分析，尤其指出了构建科学的减刑裁量机制的重要性，并指出了立法化、透明化、规范化减刑政策构建途径。第三部分，笔者对于建立、健全、完善罪犯计分考核制度进行了全面分析，不仅分析了现存问题，而且提出了要设置好罪犯考核机制，将罪犯日常考核与罪犯悔改表现相结合，建立合理的现实表现评估机制的论点；笔者认为罪犯计分考核制度的健全需要建立警察负责、罪犯评议的制度。建议利用信息化手段，建立考核历史数据库，向社会公开罪犯考核数据，利用信息化机制建立数据库管理模式，健全罪犯考核台账档案管理机制。第四部分，笔者从保障人权角度谈完善减刑的申报、审批体系，指出权益的保障要落到实处，分析了现有问题，提出了罪犯减刑申报、审批程序要以人为本，建议法院应不断完善减刑审批手续，要求监察部门应全程参与减刑申报、审批的监督过程，尤其指出了监察部门的事后监督重要性，提出了“强化罪犯减刑的社会影响，突出监狱改造人、教育人的职能”的论点。最后一部分，笔者认为建立减刑动态监督机制是非常有必要的，提出了建立一个独立的监察机构以弥补司法减刑程序决定性环节法律监督空白的论点，分析了该机构的职能、目的，强调该机构必须直接监督,而且要监督有力。笔者同时指出了发挥社会监督作用的重要性，要搭建畅通的倾听平台，力求监督手段多样化、长效化，同时对于违规操作的惩处要落到实处。

Commutation of the existing problems in China, the judicial process, there are many loopholes, which is not conducive to building a socialist characteristics of the legal community, but also inconsistent with the principle of "people-oriented". I believe that, should learn from the advanced concepts in the foreign legislation and execution process, get rid of the dross, and take full account of the commutation apply for the legitimate rights and interests of the parties (criminals), the protection of criminals positive transformation in a fair, just and open environment, the performance of real repentance, personal risk reduction as a precondition to have his sentence reduced incentives; break any negative artificial obstructions, emphasizing the broad monitoring function to protect the supervision and accessibility, to punish without fear, into one of the benign platform to build a substantive law and procedural law, commutation to work smoothly in the sun.This paper is divided into five parts. The first part of the from commutation judicial settings, ranging from general comparisons between domestic and foreign remission system in real conditions, the status quo of the legislative model, features, and expounded on China's judicial revelation. The second part, the author highlighted the problems present in the the commutation actual operation, the judiciary may reduce the sentence, "shall be commuted" corresponds to repent performance measurement based on the controversy expounded their views on the existing commutation reporting, ruled that the the mechanism existing problems were analyzed, in particular, pointed out the importance of building a scientific commutation discretionary mechanism, and pointed out that the legislation, transparency, standardization Construction of mitigating policies. The third part, I establish and improve, improve the offender scoring evaluation system conducted a comprehensive analysis, not only analyzes the existing problems and proposed to set criminals assessment mechanism, daily assessment of the offender and the offender repent, establish reasonable the reality of the performance assessment mechanism argument; I think the offenders scoring assessment integrity of the system need to establish the responsibility of the police, criminals appraisal system. Recommend the use of information technology, the establishment of assessment history database, offender assessment data to the public, the use of information technology mechanism to establish a database management mode, improve the assessment of offenders ledger file management mechanisms. Fourth part, I talk about the perfect commutation reporting, approval system from the perspective of the protection of human rights, the protection of the interests to be carried out, the analysis of the existing problems, criminals commutation reporting and approval procedures should focus on people, recommended that the Court should continue to improve commutation approval procedures, inspection and supervision departments should be involved throughout the the commutation reporting, approval of the supervisory process, in particular, pointed out the importance of post-supervision of the inspection and supervision departments to strengthen the social impact of the commutation of Offenders, highlighting the prison renovation, education functions "argument . The last part, I believe that the establish commutation dynamic monitoring mechanism is very necessary, the establishment of an independent supervisory body to compensate for the judicial commutation procedures decisive part of legal supervision blank argument, the functions of the agency, the purpose of emphasizing the agency must direct supervision, but also to effective supervision. I also pointed out the importance of play to the role of social supervision, to build a smooth listening platform, and strive to the oversight means of diversification, long-lasting, while the punishment for illegal operations to implement.