- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 空间规划体系论:模式解析与框架重构    

姓名:

 王金岩    

保密级别:

 内部    

学科代码:

 070502    

学科专业:

 人文地理学    

学生类型:

 博士    

学位:

 理学博士    

学位年度:

 2008    

校区:

 北京校区培养    

学院:

 地理学与遥感科学学院    

研究方向:

 城市与区域规划    

第一导师姓名:

 吴殿廷    

第一导师单位:

 北京师范大学    

提交日期:

 2009-05-23    

答辩日期:

 2008-05-19    

外文题名:

 Study on Spatial Planning System: Pattern Parsing and Frame Rebuilding    

中文摘要:
规划活动影响人类的生存空间。生存空间的急遽变迁也使人们开始反思空间规划本身。近百年来,规划的反思伴随着人类的规划实践活动一直没有间断过。空间规划体系是各类空间规划所组成的、具有一定逻辑组织关系的集合,是空间规划行政体系、法律体系、运作体系等的总称。本文探讨了空间、空间研究、空间规划和空间规划体系之间的内在联系,廓清了由于长期部门分割而导致的对完整、统一、逻辑一体性概念本原的理论迷失。国外空间规划体系的理论与实践是诸国政治、经济、文化、地理和社会制度的综合体现。各国的规划体系模式有着一定的形成机理和类型分异,存在着一定的范畴和价值取向。将之与我国空间规划体系的模式与特点进行对比,并在深刻探讨我国空间规划体系本身演化的历史源流与哲学本原基础上,能够使我们更加清晰地认识空间规划体系的范畴,并结合时空需求认识其价值取向。在时空发展的新视野上,通过深入剖析我国空间规划体系存在的问题,发现了其存在困境的内在原因,并揭示了其演化的内在驱动力和改革的历史必然性。研究的落脚点在于给出空间规划体系重构的基本原理和原则。结合近现代规划理论与实践的基本经验和时空的内在需求,本文提出了多方案对比,进而对实现空间规划体系改革的机会选择和可能性做出了理论探讨。主要内容如下:(1)论述了选题的背景,界定和区分了研究的层次(空间、空间研究、空间规划和空间规划体系),探讨了研究的理论意义和实践价值。对国内外关于空间规划体系研究的进展进行了深入的分析,认为空间规划体系的评论必须有一个相对正确的、全面的概念范畴和价值尺度。讨论了不同层面上(总体框架、内容要素、具体分析)的研究方法,给出了本文研究的内容和技术路线框架。(2)讨论了空间规划体系的理论基础与内涵。分析了国内外学者关于地理空间论、人地关系论和规划论的学术观点,并阐述了三者在支撑空间规划体系理论上的协同“三位一体”性。在剖析空间、规划、体系等概念的基础上,给出了空间规划和空间规划体系的详细定义。对空间规划体系与哲学、科学、制度等概念的关系进行了思辨性的分析和论证。(3)考察了外国空间规划体系的范畴、价值及类型。首先从横向的视野上,概括出世界空间规划体系模式的主要地域分布情况,并对空间规划体系相对成熟地域的体系模式特点和演化状况进行了分析。主要探讨了西欧模式、美澳模式和东亚模式空间规划体系框架的分异。建构了空间规划体系的形成机理、基本类型,并界定了空间规划体系的基本范畴和派生范畴,指出其价值取向的时空分异。(4)分析了我国空间规划体系的历史源流,发现我国从古至今一方面延续以中国哲学人地观为指导的空间认知框架,另一方面善于学习借鉴外国先进经验为我所用,形成了独具特色的空间规划体系的中国模式。结合我国台湾地区和香港地区的空间规划体系的实践状况,界定了我国空间规划体系的基本范畴、派生范畴,并结合时空的状况分析了价值取向的特点。指出“依托时空发展的需求,形成极具特色的中国模式”尤为重要。(5)从分析我国空间规划体系所存在的行政困境、运作困境和法律困境入手,对困境的原因进行了分析,指出在时空转型情况下的“公地”与“反公地”问题是困境产生的重要原因。深入剖析了我国空间规划体系存在的现实时空基础,分析了基本范畴和派生范畴的价值取向,这是空间规划体系模式框架的价值基础。认为在新的时空视野上,我国的空间规划体系具有演进和重构的必要性,并对重构的原则进行了探讨。(6)提出了“八位一体”重构路线的保守方案和激进方案。其中保守方案以延续现行规划体系框架最大的路径依赖性,来分析新空间规划体系的基本建构思路和模式框架。激进方案则是在保守方案的基础上加大整合的力度,使空间规划体系更加简洁和高效。还对重构的机会选择进行了理论分析,认为空间规划体系的重构需要我们认知的辩证性觉醒,需要政府和规划师在重构进程中扮演重要的角色。总之,空间规划体系存在着时空分异性和多种范式,具备一定的形成机理和类型模式;其存在着核心和派生范畴,范畴框架下的时空价值取向是把握空间规划体系的核心所在;其改革有一定的路径,但认知觉醒与体制创新是一个与我国总体改革相关的、复杂艰巨的系统性工作。本文依托地理学基础理论,界定了空间、空间研究、空间规划和空间规划体系的概念分异,廓清了相关研究范畴,将空间规划体系研究上升到哲学层面,给出了空间规划体系与时空发展对立统一的开放、多元反馈模式,丰富了规划理论与实践,对规划体系的改革或有一定参考价值。
外文摘要:
Planning activities had greatly influenced and changed the human being’s living space, while people start to ponder the spatial planning itself from the sharp vicissitude of living space. From the last century, the academic discuss have not been interrupted accompanied with the practical planning activities of human beings. The spatial planning system, composed of all sorts of spatial planning, is the aggregate with logical relations, which stands for the administration system, law system, and operation system, and so on. The inner relationship of spatial study, spatial planning, and spatial planning system is discussed in this paper. As a whole concept, the propose of the spatial planning system expurgates the theoretical puzzle of the integrative, uniform, and logical fundamental concept caused by the long-term department division. The theory and practice of foreign spatial planning system integratively embodied the policy, economy, culture, geography, and society system of foreign countries. The foreign planning system mode has formation mechanism and style diversity, and has category and value tendency to some extent. Comparing it with the mode and characteristics of our spatial planning system, based on the historical and philosophy origin of its evolvement, we could know the category of spatial planning system more clearly and understand its value trend combing with the space-time demand. In the new vision of space-time development, we found the internal reason of its existent puzzlement by analyzing deeply the problem in our spatial planning system, and revealed the inner drive of its evolvement and the historical inevitability of innovation. The keystone of this research relies on the basical theory and principle of the re-construction of spatial planning system. Associative with the basic experience of the modern planning theory and practice and the inner demand of space-time, we proposed several blue prints and discussed theoretically the chance selection and possibility of the spatial planning system innovation. Based on the thought above mentioned, the paper includes the following results and conclusions:(1)The background of the subject is stated, the research arrangement (spatial, spatial study, spatial planning, and spatial planning system) is defined and divided, and the research significance in theory and practice is discussed. Secondly, the research development of spatial planning system in domestic and foreign countries is analyzed deeply. We thought the spatial planning system should have relatively correct and general concept category and value standard. Thirdly, the research method in different ranges is provided, including the whole frame, content, and detailed analysis. And, the content and technical path is supplied. (2)The theoretical basic and connotation of the spatial planning system are discussed. We analyze the academic points about geographical space theory, relation theory between man and land, and planning theory, and states the cooperativity of the three components in supporting the spatial planning system. Then, the detailed define of spatial planning and the spatial planning system was present relying on the statement of spatial, planning, and system. And, this paper considers and argues the relationship of the space planning system and philosophy, science, and system, and provides the basic points of these relationships. (3)The category, value, and style of foreign spatial planning system are discussed. Firstly, based on the main regional distribution of the worldwide mode, the relatively perfect system mode character and evolvement was compared in the transverse view. We enumerate the west-European pattern, the American-Australia pattern, and the east-Asia pattern, which embodied the diversity of the frame. Then, according to the differences in these countries, the formation mechanism and basic style of the spatial planning system was constructed, the basic and derived category of the spatial planning system was defined, and the space-time difference of value orientation was explained.(4)We analyze the historical origin of our spatial planning system in longitudinal view and found that on one hand, we inherited the spatial cognition frame guided by the Chinese philosophy, on the other hand, we are good at learning the foreign advanced experience, therefore, Chinese characteristic mode of the spatial planning system has been formed. Combined with the practice of space planning system in our Taiwan and Hong Kong area, the basic and derived category of the spatial planning system was defined, and the character of the value orientation was construed based on the space-time status. Therefore, it is important to form Chinese characteristic mode based on demand of space-time development.(5)Start with analysis of the administration puzzle, operation puzzle, and principle puzzle in our space planning system, we focus on the reason of puzzle and proposes that the problem of ‘land’ and ‘against land’ constitutes the main reason. Afterwards, this part analyses deeply the practical space-time base exited in our space planning system and the value orientation of the basic and derived category, which constitutes the value base of the mode frame of space planning system. Finally, it is necessary to evolve and re-construct for our space planning system in the new view of space-time, and the principle of re-construction was discussed.(6)We proposed the ‘eight-incorporate’ re-constructive ways under the guidance of the principle of space planning system. Directed by these technical pathways, we bring forward the conservative subject and radical subject. During which, the conservative subject continued and relied on the actual space planning system frame and analyzed the basic construction thought and the mode frame in the new space planning system. While the radical subject was based on the conservative subject but increased the intensity of conformity, which made the subject more compact and effective comparing with the conservative subject. In the end of this part, we analyzed the chance selection of re-construction in theory and thought that the re-construction of space planning system demands not only the dialectic awakening of our knowledge but also the important role of the government and the programmers in this process. As a conclusion, there are the space-time diversity, several templates, formation mechanism, style mode and basic and derived category in the space planning system. The space-time value orientation under the category frame is the core of the space planning system. And the innovation of the space planning system has pathways, but the knowledge wakening and innovation is complicated, arduous, and systematic work related with our country’s innovation. Next, this paper based on the geographical basic theory, defined the concept of space, space research, space planning, and space planning system, distinguished a series of research category and raised the research of space planning system to the philosophical level of geography and program. Furthermore, this paper supplied the open and multiple mode of the space planning system opposed and uniformed with the space-time development, which run through the check of category and value. This paper riches the planning in theory and practice and has enormous referenced value for the innovation and decision-making of the planning system.
参考文献总数:

 152    

作者简介:

 王金岩,男,汉族,山东兖州人。主要研究方向为城市与区域规划,发表论文十余篇,完成科研与实践项目十余项。    

馆藏地:

 图书馆学位论文阅览区(主馆南区三层BC区)    

馆藏号:

 博070502/0905    

开放日期:

 2009-05-23    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式