钱澄之，安徽桐城人，是明末遗民的杰出代表，有着坎坷却激昂的人生际遇，更以诗文闻名于世。本文以钱澄之及其著述为主要研究对象，重点阐述其著述的刊刻、禁毁及现存情况，以管窥明清时期江南地区私家书坊刊刻书籍的一般流程以及乾隆时期禁书的效用性等问题。钱澄之主要著作有七部，分别为：《田间诗集》、《田间文集》、《藏山阁集》、《所知录》、《田间诗学》、《田间诗学》、《田间易学》及《庄屈合诂》。钱氏著作在其生前身后都曾被多次刻印，最具代表性的是康熙二十九年在徐乾学等资助下的刻书，由于种种原因，仅刊刻并印行五种，即《田间诗集》、《田间文集》、《田间诗学》、《田间易学》及《庄屈合诂》。本文依据钱澄之晚年《田间尺牍》中与友人往来书信对此次刻书的记载，探究其刊刻地点、历时、资费等问题，希望通过这一具体实例的分析，洞察明清时期私家书坊的一般情况。由于钱澄之明末遗民的特殊历史身份以及著述内容的所谓违碍之处，其部分著作在乾隆时期惨遭禁毁。《田间诗集》、《田间文集》、《所知录》三种遭遇禁毁的原因或许各异，但是乾隆禁书均未致使其湮没于历史的长河，现今都有存本，其后学者对其禁毁著述的引用、评论、赞许亦未有竟时。与此形成鲜明对比的是乾隆为禁书多次下诏，其禁书规模之大、历时之久也属罕见，这不能不让人怀疑，乾隆时期的禁书可能并非前人所以为的那样具有强制性、普遍性、有效性。本文尝试对钱澄之著述及其相关问题进行分析，希望能起到抛砖引玉的作用，从而引起有关明清时期私家刊刻以及乾隆禁书研究者的注意。

Chengzhi Qian, as an outstanding representative of Ming dynasty’s adherents, has a bumpy but passionate life, who is more known for poetry. With Chengzhi Qian and works as the main research object, this paper focuses on the publishing, denial and existing situation of his works, which helps to probe into the general process of publishing books in a private bookshop in the south of the Yangtze river during the Ming and Qing dynasties and the effect of the banned books in Qianlong period. Chengzhi Qian’s main seven works, respectively, the poetry anthology of Tianjian, the corpus anthology of Tianjian, the anthology of pavilion hidden in the mountain, gewusst record, the poetics of Tianjian, the study of Yi of Tianjian , the annotation of Zhuang Zi and Chu Ci. Chengzhi Qian’s works were printed for many times, the most representative one is the Qianlong twenty-nine years under the funding of Qianxue Xu. Due to various reasons, only five of his works were carved, namely, the poetry anthology of Tianjian, the corpus anthology of Tianjian, the poetics of Tianjian, the study of Yi of Tianjian, the annotation of Zhuang Zi and Chu Ci. According to Chengzhi Qian’s correspondence with friends of Letter of Tianjian, this airticle probe into the organizing site, duration, charges and other issues of publishing his books. Through the analysis of the specific example, the project in general during the Ming and Qing dynasties private bookshop could be clarified. Because of the special historical identity as adherents of Ming and his works’ content of so-called taboo, some of their works in Qianlong period were denied. The poetry anthology of Tianjian, the corpus anthology of Tianjian , gewusst record, which were denied verified reason, but the books which were banned by Qianlong did not have their annihilation in the long river of history. Those works still exist, which even are quoted, discussed and commended by scholars all the time. In contrast, Qianlong had issued the banned orders for many times. It is recorded that the campaign of banning books in Qianlong period is on a rarely scale and last long in comparison. This article come up with the doubts that this campaign’s mandatory, universality and effectiveness. This article is used for Leading to more discussion and good theory about publishing books of the Ming and Qing dynasties and banned books by Qianlong.