弗拉基米尔·纳博科夫(1899-1977)是一位具有异质传奇色彩的小说家，也是现代和后现代文学的大师之一。《洛丽塔》作为纳博科夫的代表作，自问世以来就受到理论界的广泛关注。同时，随着20世纪电影技术和银幕文化的发展，《洛丽塔》饱受导演青睐，至今已出现两个电影版本，分别是1962年斯坦利·库布里克的《洛丽塔》和1997年阿德里安·莱恩的《一枝梨花压海棠》。
在关于《洛丽塔》的研究中，小说《洛丽塔》中对于弗洛伊德理论的频繁戏仿成为学界的关注热点。许多学者指出此戏仿并不应该被简单地理解为纳博科夫对弗洛伊德的讽刺和敌意，而是纳博科夫更深层次的谋略——借用精神分析理论为一种建构故事内容和阐述美学理念的工具。然而，关于分析电影《洛丽塔》如何运用精神分析理论的研究还很少。
本文选择1997年阿德里安·莱恩的电影版《洛丽塔》（《一枝梨花压海棠》）为研究对象,采用比较分析法证明，阿德里安·莱恩的电影与原小说一样借用精神分析理论以达成建构文本及其美学阐述的目的。然而，虽然建构策略一致，研究发现电影《洛丽塔》在借用精神分析理论的内容和方式上表现出了不同：从内容上看，电影《洛丽塔》制作团队进行了创作干预，相应增减了精神分析学派不同理论的引用;从方式上看，与原作小说中极具讽刺性和侵略性戏仿的伪装相比，电影《洛丽塔》中精神分析理论应用的讽刺性要少得多，更温和、直接地达成了《洛丽塔》本质的美学阐述目标。

Vladimir Nabokov (1899-1977) is a heterogeneously legendary novelist, being one of the great masters of modern and post-modern literature. Lolita, as Nabokov’s representative work, has attracted much attention from academia since its birth. Meanwhile, with motion picture technique and the screen culture developed in the 20th century, there have been two versions of film Lolita which is done by Stanley Kubrick in 1962 and Adrian Lyne in 1997.
Among researches, frequent, intentional parody of psychoanalysis in novel Lolita has got wide attention and many scholars has argued that the parody of psychoanalysis was in turn an acceptance as a helpful tool for construction of story content and aesthetic elaboration, instead of simple parody and hatred towards Freud. However, there are still very few papers discussing what and how psychoanalysis is applied in film Lolita, compared with the original novel.
This thesis chooses Adrian Lyne’s Lolita in 1997 as research object and uses the method of comparative analysis to argue that Adrian Lyne’s 1997 film Lolita is accord with the original novel on parodying psychoanalytic theory as a helpful tool for construction of story content and aesthetic elaboration. Despite the conformity, the study also finds that film Lolita shows its differences on what and how psychoanalytic theories are applied. In contents, film Lolita adds or subtracts some psychoanalytic theories according to the intervention of production team; in manners, application of psychoanalysis in the film Lolita on the whole is much less parodic and more direct to the aesthetics elaboration of Lolita, compared with the ones in the original novel being covered with extreme ironic and aggressive parody.