随着全球环境问题凸显，各国研究者越来越重视对环境权理论的研究。环境权理论本身较复杂，加之学者研究方法、学术背景不同，关于环境权的许多问题众说纷立、莫衷一是。世界上较多国家从立法上确立了环境权，但环保先进国家，诸如日本、美国等至今仍未从立法上确认环境权。目前，我国也没有从立法上确立环境权，现存的环境法立法体系呈现的特点是预防和救济少、管制多。这与我国对环境权理论研究的生疏所带来的缺陷有关，当然也不排除我国的立法确认方式是以国家公权力为主导，强调国家在环境保护中的作用，其法律对策主要集中于公权力的运用上这些因素有关。目前的环境法立法体系使得国家政策与公民权利之间缺乏明确的衔接，从而妨碍了基本权利法律化的进程。要改变这一状况，首先应该在宪法中确立环境权；其次需从相关法律、法规中对环境权具体化；再次，必须借助制度模式和组织结构的力量完善我国的环境保护的司法实践和诉讼制度。

As global environmental problems highlighted, more and more investigator attach importance to the theory of environmental rights. Environmental rights are complex, plus the research methods and backgrounds are different, and many environmental issues divided. More countries have legislated the environmental rights, but advanced countries such as Japan and the USA have not been confirmed on it. Our country has no legislation on environmental rights. Environmental law and the existing legislative system showed that the relief of protection and stress on controlling. This is about the unfamiliar of theoretical research and the way of Legislative confirmation. The current legislative system of environmental law makes the national policy and civil rights lack the clear convergence, which impeding the legal process of fundamental rights. First of all, we should established environmental rights in constitution; secondly, we should reifier it in the relevant laws and regulations; thirdly, we must use improve judicial practice and litigation system of environmental protection with the power of system model and organizational structure.