强迫交易罪是一种比较多发的破坏市场经济秩序的犯罪,这种行为不利于经济发展，损害了个人和国家的利益。目前而言对强迫交易罪的研究主要集中理论分析方面，而本文则是以统计分析强迫交易罪的犯罪主体等因素为基础，以2014年度已判决的244个强迫交易罪案件为对象展开的实证分析研究，分析强迫交易罪在司法实践中呈现的特点以及原因、分析影响强迫交易罪定罪量刑的因素以及在司法实践中存在的问题和笔者的观点。通过分析强迫交易罪的主体的籍贯、共同犯罪情况、以及是否有特殊身份等因素来确定强迫交易罪多发的客观背景。通过统计强迫交易罪客观方面的行为模式、涉及产业以及行为后果来界定强迫交易罪的构成要件，以此区分强迫交易罪与其他相似罪名的区别。通过分析司法时间中强迫交易罪的主刑附加刑的试用情况、缓刑的试用以及其他因素对定罪量刑的影响来确定强迫交易罪的量刑规律。本文通过以下方面展开了研究并形成了相关结论：第一，对强迫交易罪量刑样本进行选取和考察。笔者以2014年全国范围内发生的224件强迫交易罪的判决为研究样本，分析判决书中强迫交易罪的主体情况，客观方面的情况，主要研究强迫交易罪犯罪主体的性别、籍贯、文化程度、行为方式以及行为后果等因素。通过分析以上内容分析强迫交易罪的特点，进而解决强迫交易罪在司法实践中定罪方面存在的问题。第二，研究了影响自由刑和罚金刑量刑的因素。关于作为连续性变量的强迫交易罪涉案数额、强迫次数与伤害后果。统计分析表明，随着涉案金额的增加、强迫次数的增多、伤害后果的加重，所对应的量刑结果也相应加重。第三，研究了缓刑适用的影响因素。笔者研究发现影响缓刑适用的因素主要体现在主体性因素、量刑情节因素两个方面。具体来说，犯罪人的是否有前科、是否是从犯、是否自首、是否取得被害人的谅解，这些因素对缓刑的适用均有影响。第四，研究司法实践中关于强迫交易罪具体案例的分析。笔者发现司法实践中存在一些案例，其判决结果与刑法的规定并不吻合，笔者将对此类型案件进行分析，对于疑难表达笔者自己的观点。

The crime of forced transaction is a kind of common crimes of crimes of disrupting the market economic order. This behavior is bad for the developing of economic .It will bring great damage to the citizen's personal and property safety. Now, the research on the crime of forced transactions is mainly about theoretical analysis. This paper is the statistical analysis of subject of crime, objective behavior, the result, sentencing of the crime of forced transaction, and the research is based on the 244 forced transaction accident crime cases which were convicted in 2014. The crime of forced trading analysis presents the characteristics of the judicial practice and the reasons analyze the impact of the crime of forced trading conviction and sentencing factors, and in the judicial practice problems and the author's point of view. By analyzing the place of origin of the main crime of forced trading, common crime, and whether there is a special status and other factors to determine the crime of forced trading multiple objective background. Behavior patterns by statistical objective aspect of the crime of forced transactions involving industrial and behavioral consequences to define the crime of forced transactions Elements in order to distinguish the difference between the crime of forced trading and other similar charges. By analyzing the case of judicial time trial principal penalty additional penalty of sin forced transactions, and other factors affecting the trial probation for the conviction and sentencing to determine sentencing laws forced trading sin.The first chapter is studying the crime of forced transaction sample selection and inspection. The author find 224 forced trading decision as the research sample, the analysis of the main body of forced trading, in the judgment of objective, the main research of forced transaction crime subject gender, native place, the degree of culture, behavior and consequences. Through the analysis of the characteristics of the above content analysis of forced trading, and then solve forced transaction crime convictions in the judicial practice problems. The second chapter is about the factors that affect free punishment and fine punishment sentencing. About the amount of force trading charges involved as a continuous variable, the number of force and damage consequence. Statistical analysis showed that with the increase of the amount, the increase, the number of forced damage consequence is aggravating, the corresponding sentencing results also increase accordingly. The third chapter is about the influence factors of probation applicable. The study found that factors influencing the probation applicable mainly reflected in two aspects of subjectivity, sentencing plot. Specifically, if there is a record of criminal offence, whether it is an accessory, whether to surrender, these factors are influential in the application of probation The fourth chapter is to analyze specific cases of judicial practice, I found that there are some cases of judicial practice, the verdict is not consistent with the provisions of the criminal law, I will analyze this type of case, difficult for the author to express my views.