研究目的：本研究通过探讨功能性体育锻炼对轻度特发性脊柱侧凸男大学生的躯干形体、生理机能和主观感受特征的干预效果，希望为该群体进行科学合理的体育锻炼来矫正轻度特发性脊柱侧凸提供参考。 研究方法：通过电子招募广告招募到来自北京市海淀区三所高校的30名18-23岁的男生，平均年龄为20.43±1.30岁。纳入标准为：（1）脊柱倾斜角不小于5度且不大于20度、（2）身体健康、无骨折或其他导致不能进行体育锻炼的损伤、（3）仅有单个节段产生侧凸。随机分为实验组和对照组，每组各15人；实验组进行持续8周，每周2次，每次60分钟的功能性体育锻炼；对照组不接受任何形式的运动干预。运动干预前后分别使用脊柱电子测量仪（Model-SH105）对两组男生的脊柱倾斜角、身体平衡度和脊柱活动度进行测量；使用肺活量测试仪（HK600-FH）来测量其肺活量；使用简中版SRS-22问卷来评估两组男生的生活质量及满意度。采用SPSS 20.0软件对数据进行统计分析，P＜0.05具有统计学意义。 研究结果：（1）运动干预前，两组男生的脊柱倾斜角、身体平衡度均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。运动干预后，实验组脊柱倾斜角、肩部平衡度和髋部平衡度较运动干预前分别降低了1.71度、0.27度和0.20度，其中脊柱倾斜角和肩部平衡度的下降有统计学意义（P<0.05），髋部平衡度的下降无统计学意义（P>0.05）。对照组脊柱倾斜角、肩部和髋部平衡度较运动干预前分别提升了0.06度、0.18度和0.28度，无统计学意义（P>0.05）。运动干预后，实验组脊柱倾斜角和身体平衡度均显著低于对照组（P<0.05）。 （2）运动干预前，两组男生的脊柱活动度、肺活量无统计学意义（P>0.05）。运动干预后，实验组上述指标显著提升（P<0.05）；对照组上述指标与运动干预前变化幅度不大（P>0.05）；实验组右侧向弯曲活动度和肺活量同对照组相比无统计学意义（P>0.05），其余所有指标均显著高于对照组（P<0.05）。 （3）运动干预前，两组男生除疼痛外，其余所有生活质量及满意度指标经检验均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。运动干预后，实验组五个指标的得分均有提升，其中自我形象、心理健康和对治疗的满意程度较运动干预前有统计学意义（P<0.05）；对照组除疼痛外的所有指标均无统计学意义（P>0.05）；实验组的心理健康和对治疗的满意程度显著高于对照组（P<0.05）。 研究结论：（1）功能性体育锻炼对轻度特发性脊柱侧凸男大学生的躯干形体特征有改善功能，其中对脊柱两侧的肌肉隆起和左右肩峰不等高现象的改善效果较明显，对髋部左右不对称的改善效果不明显。 （2）功能性体育锻炼对轻度特发性脊柱侧凸男大学生的生理机能特征具有提升作用，对三个平面上脊柱的活动能力均有改善效果，但对脊柱向凹侧弯曲能力的改善效果不显著；除此之外，对人体主动进行吸换气能力的改善效果不明显。 （3）功能性体育锻炼对轻度特发性脊柱侧凸男大学生的主观感受特征具有促进功效，其中对心理健康和治疗评价的提升程度较显著。

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of functional physical exercise on the body shape, physiological function and subjective sensation characteristics of male college students with mild idiopathic scoliosis,in the hope of providing references for the scientific and reasonable spinal health movement to correct idiopathic scoliosis in this group. Methods: 30 male students, aged 18-23,from three universities in haidian district,Beijing were recruited via the Internet,with an average age of 20.43±1.30 years old. The inclusion criteria were :(1) Spinal obliquity should be no less than 5 degrees and no more than 20 degrees,(2) health, no fracture or other injuries that prevented physical exercise,(3) only a single segment produces scoliosis. The male subjects were then divided into the experimental group and the control group, with 15 men in each group. The experimental group underwent functional physical exercise, which lasted for 8 weeks, twice a week,each costed 60 minutes; The control group did not receive any form of exercise intervention. Before and after the exercise intervention, electronic spine measurement instrument (model-sh105) was used to measure the spinal inclination, body balance and spinal mobility of boys in the two groups. Lung capacity was measured using a spirometer (hk600-fh); The SRS-22 questionnaire was used to evaluate the life quality and satisfaction of two groups of male students. SPSS 20.0 software was used for statistical analysis of the data, and P < 0.05 was statistically significant. Results :(1) Before the exercise intervention, there was no statistical significance in the spinal inclination Angle and body balance of boys in the two groups (P>0.05). After the exercise intervention, the spinal inclination Angle, shoulder balance degree and hip balance degree in the experimental group were reduced by 1.71 degree, 0.27 degree and 0.20 degree, respectively, compared with before the exercise intervention. The decreases in the spinal inclination Angle and shoulder balance degree were statistically significant (P<0.05), while the decreases in the hip balance degree were not statistically significant (P>0.05). In the control group, the balance degrees of spinal inclination, shoulder and hip were increased by 0.06, 0.18 and 0.28, respectively, compared with that before the exercise intervention, without statistical significance (P>0.05). After the exercise intervention, the spinal inclination Angle and body balance in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). (2) Before the exercise intervention, the spinal activity and vital capacity of boys in the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). After exercise intervention, the above indexes were significantly increased in the experimental group (P<0.05). In the control group, there was no significant change between the above indicators and before the exercise intervention (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, there was no statistical significance in terms of right-sided bending activity and lung capacity in the experimental group (P>0.05), and all other indicators were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). (3) Before the exercise intervention, all indexes of life quality and satisfaction of boys in the two groups were not statistically significant except pain (P>0.05). After the exercise intervention, the scores of the five indicators in the experimental group were all improved, among which the self-image, mental health and satisfaction with the treatment were statistically significant (P<0.05). In the control group, all indicators except pain were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The psychological health and satisfaction degree of treatment in the experimental group were significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion :(1) Functional physical exercise can improve the body features of male college students with mild idiopathic scoliosis, especially the muscle uplift on both sides of the spine and unequal acromion height on the left and right, but not the left and right hip asymmetry. (2) Functional physical exercise can improve the physiological characteristics of male college students with mild idiopathic scoliosis, and improve the activity of the spine on three planes, but not significantly improve the ability to bend the concave side of the spine. In addition, the improvement of the body's ability to actively absorb and exchange air is not obvious. (3) Functional physical exercise has a promoting effect on the subjective perception characteristics of male college students with mild idiopathic scoliosis, in which the improvement degree of mental health and treatment evaluation is significant.