本研究旨在探讨义务教育阶段，农村尖子生选择通过分数择校、关系择校进城就读的现象。农村尖子生怀揣着“走出去”的信念，得到了家庭的鼎力支持和城市学校对优秀生源的“掐尖式”积极吸纳，从而成功开辟了一条进城就读的道路。采用叙事研究策略，本文分析了这些尖子生在城市学校中的就读体验，发现尽管他们对于择校这个选择持有一致的价值判断，但是却有着不同色调的情绪体验。那么分化由何而来？入场方式和进场成本、生存压强的大小、对于集体融入程度的差异以及个体对于周边世界意义解读的不同，以上四个方面是他们产生体验分化的主要原因。研究同时揭示了“出走”背后的复杂性，在拓展见识、打开更多的可能性的背后，是收获的阴影——他们像是被催熟的酸涩果子，体验着“难以承受的生命之重”，这是他们在追求更优质的教育机会的过程中所遭遇的挑战和困境。他们是这场“移植冒险”中的幸运儿，也是这场风险投资中的赢家，成功地实现了中考的“惊险一跃”，并成功地“走出去”了。从这个意义上说，他们很像理查德·霍加特所说的那种“奖学金男孩”。对于他们中的一些人而言，随着时间的推移，“浮游无根”的失落感开始出现、“恋乡症”开始延迟发作，促使他们对“走出去”的行动和信念进行更深层次的反思和超越。

This study aims to explore the phenomenon of rural top students choosing schools to study in cities through score selection and relationship selection during the compulsory education stage. Rural top students, with the belief of "going out", have received strong support from their families and active absorption of excellent students by urban schools, thus successfully opening up a path of progressive learning. Using a narrative research strategy, this article analyzes the learning experiences of these top students in urban educational environments and finds that although they hold a consistent value judgment on the choice of school, they have different emotional experiences with different tones. So, where did differentiation come from? The main reasons for their experience differentiation are the entry methods and entry costs, the size of survival pressure, differences in the level of collective integration, and differences in individual interpretations of the surrounding world. The study also revealed the complexity behind "running away", and behind expanding their horizons and opening up more possibilities, there is the shadow of harvest - they are like ripened sour fruits, experiencing the "unbearable weight of life", which is the challenge and dilemma they encounter in the pursuit of better educational opportunities. They are the lucky ones in this "transplant adventure", successfully achieving the "thrilling leap" of the high school entrance examination and successfully "going out". In this sense, they are very similar to what Richard Hogart called "scholarship boys". For some of them, as time goes by, a sense of loss of being "floating without roots" begins to emerge, and "homesickness" begins to erupt, prompting them to reflect and transcend their actions and beliefs of "going out" at a deeper level.