论文以承载原史文化的原史文献作为研究对象，其中“志”、“语”文献是论文探讨的核心。原史文献中的“志”、“语”文献是贯穿论文的主线，论文的三个方面都是围绕此核心展开。 商周鼎革之际是巫与史断裂的转捩点，史官脱胎于巫文化系统，成为独立的文化创造者，是周代原史文化的创始人。周代史官在周王朝庞大的职官系统中发挥着巨大作用，他们一直以其自身的文化职能作为文化创造的依据，以周代的职官系统作为保障，充分发挥了史官文化创造的能力。在史官群体中的瞽史是此文化创造群体的特殊成员，他们自身秉承巫文化系统中的天道背景，又有史官群体的人文意识，口耳传承原史文献，并辅助于文字记载，是原史文献的保留者与传承者。 “志”、“语”文献是原史文献中的一类，是传承原史文化的重要载体。“志”类文献是书于金石简牍的文字，出于周代史官之手，是周代原史文献。反映在《左传》、《国语》中则表现为春秋时期的言论，其中既有记言之“志”，又有记事之“志”，记载内容广泛，涉及到周王朝社会生活的诸多方面。“志”类文献出于周代史官之手，与同时期的钟鼎铭文共同反映了此时期的史官建构原史文化的要求。“语”类文献原始形态是口耳相传的言语，在发展过程中逐渐著录，它也是出于周代史官之手的原史文献。反映在《尚书》、《左传》、《国语》中也是言论记载，也分为言类之“语”与事类之“语”，相较于“志”类文献要丰富，反映的社会生活方面更为广阔，表现的史官文化思想意识更为集中。两者共同成为时代的文化资源。在当时之所以被史官载录是因为传统中的“重言”观念，表现出来的是周代史官文化创造的要求。 春秋君子是继承原史文献出现在春秋历史舞台上的文化群体，春秋君子的内涵已经逐渐加重了道德意义，是儒家君子观念的先声，不同于春秋以前传统意义上的君子概念。作为一个全新的文化群体，他们通过对原史文献的“征引”，特别是对“志”、“语”类文献的征引，不断的融入自身文化群体在建构文化过程中的要求。在“征引”的文化行为中春秋君子培养了自身的文化品格，注重“德”与“礼”，成为春秋文化的杰出代表。关键词：史官　　志　　语　　征引　　君子

Thesis is study on protohistory literature which recording the protohistory culture. “Zhi” and “Yu” literature are the key points at thesis. The “Zhi” and “Yu” literature of protohistory literature are linking the whole thesis. This project which containing three parts is extending on it. Shang&zhou period is most important period for rupturing of Shaman and History. The history officer was born out of Shaman Culture System who created a certain culture and original culture of Zhou Dynasty. History officers played great important role at Zhou Dynasty. They built the temporary culture by making use of official title and work, especially the official government system. The history officers fully played their abilities on cultural creation. “Gushi” is the special group of history officers, which inherited the Tiaodao Thinking from Shaman culture, and accept humanism from history officer, and spread protohistory, meanwhile assistant to record the information. The Gushi who play keeping and broadcasting protohistory documents role. “Zhi” and “Yu” document are kinds of protohistory documents, which are very important materials to learn and spread. It is reflected in The Spring and Autumn Period remarks at “Zuozhuan” and “Guoyu” in which concluding two kind of “Zhi”, one of which recorded the talking, the other recorded the facts about various aspects of Zhou Dynasty. “Zhi” Documents are created by history officers. “Zhi” Documents and contemporaneous Bronze Inscrptions reflect the history officers’ requirements at developing protohistory culture. “Yu” documents developed from conversational language, which was recorded at different period. “Yu” is recorded by history officers at Zhou Dynasty, which also reflect in the remarks recording and also concluding the two types mentioned here. But the “Yu” is more abundant, relating more social life and can more effectively reflecting history officers culture. The two documents are the culture materials that period. It is because the government focused on talking between persons. The gentlemen at Spring and Autumn Period inherit the protohistory documents at that period, who began to pay attention to morality, which is protoconfucianism. It is different from traditional gentlemen’s concept before Spring and Autumn Period. Gentlemen as newest cultural group combined their own requirements in the process of culture creating by quoting Protohistory, especially “Zhi” and “Yu”, meanwhile they built their own cultural character which is stressing the importance of “Morality” and “Manners” becoming outstanding representative of Spring and Autumn Period culture. KEY WORDS：Historiographers Zhi Yu Quot Gentlemen