摘要:国际商事仲裁的司法监督一直是国际商事仲裁研究的一个重点，而撤销程序则是司法监督中最为重要的环节之一。司法监督对仲裁裁决的撤销是对裁决效力最大的否定，裁决一旦进入撤销程序将会面临诸如裁决域内域外效力是否丧失，撤销程序救济手段等一系列后果问题。我国的国际商事仲裁制度立法起步较晚，虽然在《仲裁法》颁布后的十多年时间中，取得了长足的进步，但目前仍然存在很多问题。本文主要以中国国际商事仲裁立法为基础，结合我国目前涉外商事仲裁撤销程序中的一些特点，通过分析比较其他相关国家以及国际仲裁条约中撤销程序的后果，对我国国际商事仲裁裁决撤销程序的司法研究提出建议。

Abstract ：Judicial supervision over international commercial arbitration has been a research focus all along. The process of setting awards aside is one of the most important parts, which can be the most serious negative means to arbitration effect. Once an award is considered to be canceled, it has to face a series of outcomes such as whether arbitration award effect in and out of a country exists or not, what remedies can be resorted to and so on. Though legislation regarding international commercial arbitration system in our state started late, we have made many amendments and improvements, and have gained much progress since issuing Arbitration Law of People’s Republic of China. Nevertheless, there are still plenty of problems in both legislative and practical aspects. Consequently, in this essay mainly based on situation of legislation and some representative judicial supervision procedures in our country, I will put forward some suggestions toward judicial research of international commercial arbitration system in our country via comparing and analyzing different legislation and practice in the international world.