作为一种特殊的自然资源，无线电频谱对各类无线电通信技术起到了关键的支撑作用。为防止不同无线电系统之间相互干扰，建立规范有序的用频环境，政府部门需要积极介入并有效监管。尤其是在重大活动筹备和举办阶段，需要满足与活动相关的各类无线电频率使用需求，确保合法合规的无线电台（站）和设备安全有序运行，尽可能防止无线电干扰情况出现，及时处理因干扰引发的突发情况。相对于无线电技术的快速发展，无线电监管体制调整相对迟缓，许多新生业态与当前监管制度间的矛盾日益突出，进一步加重了监管部门的管理负担。一方面，随着各行各业对频谱资源需求的增加，用频单位申请使用大量频谱资源，供需失衡愈发明显。另一方面，我国无线电监管体制在历史上数次调整，形成了当前政府无线电监管部门主导，军民统筹协调、多部门齐抓共管的现状，这对重大活动场景下合理分配频谱资源、快速处置无线电干扰等跨领域协同治理工作提出了严峻考验。

本文首先探讨了重大活动无线电监管的治理边界，运用协同治理理论对重大活动无线电监管进行了深入分析。协同治理强调治理主体多元化，参与无线电监管协同治理的主体涉及政府部门、行业系统（广电、民航、交通等20多家相关部门和单位）等，共同构成了协同治理网络体系。本文以北京冬奥会中的无线电安全保障工作为典型实例，探讨当前无线电监管方式及其效用，旨在全面真实地反映无线电监管工作在协同治理方面的发展现状。对于重大活动期间的无线电监管难题，本文进行了系统阐述，分析了多元主体间欠缺保障合力、领导者未完全发挥催化作用、多元主体没有统一治理标准、保障资源未充分整合共享等问题。利用协同治理理论的 SFIC 模型讨论了产生这些问题的原因，包括多元主体参与动机不足，协同主导者的领导力相对薄弱，多元主体治理政策供给待完善，保障主体间缺乏信任沟通与对话等，继而提出了夯实起始条件、完善制度设计、优化协同过程等对策建议，以期对重大活动无线电监管工作能够提供一定的参考和借鉴价值。

As a special natural resource, radio spectrum plays a key role in supporting various radio communication technologies. In order to prevent the mutual interference between different radio systems and establish a orderly electromagnetic environment, relevant government departments need to actively intervene and carry out effective supervision. Especially in the preparation and holding stage of major events, it is necessary to meet the radio frequency needs related to the event, ensure the safe and orderly operation of legal radio stations and equipment, reduce or prevent radio interference as much as possible, and timely deal with emergencies caused by radio interference. Compared with the rapid development of radio technology, the adjustment of the radio regulatory system is relatively slow, and many new forms of radio services do not adapt to the current regulation system, which further aggravates the growing regulation burden of the government. On the one hand, as the demand for radio spectrum resource in various industries is increasing rapidly, and frequency users apply to radio regulatory agencies for a large amount of frequencies, while the supply-demand imbalance is becoming more apparent. On the other hand, China's radio regulation system has undergone multiple adjustments in history, forming the current situation under coordination between military and civilian as well as multi-department regulation, which puts forward a test for cross-field collaborative governance work such as reasonable allocation of spectrum resources and rapid disposal of radio interference during major events.

This article firstly explores the governance boundary of radio regulation for major events in detail, and makes an in-depth analysis of radio regulation of major activities by using the theory of collaborative governance. Collaborative governance emphasizes the diversification of governance entities. The entities participating in the collaborative governance of radio regulation involve government departments and industry systems (more than 20 relevant departments and institutions such as broadcasting, civil aviation, and transportation, etc). These jointly participating entities together constitute the collaborative governance network system. This article takes radio security guarantee work of the Beijing Winter Olympic Games as a typical example, to discuss the methods and effectiveness of current radio regulation, aiming at comprehensively and truly reflecting the development of the regulatory system. This article systematically discusses and analyzes the difficulties of radio regulation during major events, such as weak regulatory foundation, insufficient regulatory leadership, inconsistent institutions or standards, and poor integration and sharing capabilities. Using the SFIC model theoretical framework of collaborative governance theory, this article discusses the reasons for these problems, such as insufficient participation motivation of multiple guarantee subjects, limited catalytic role of collaborative leaders, insufficient supply of governance policies for multiple subjects, and lack of trust, communication, and dialogue among guarantee subjects. This article also proposes countermeasures and suggestions such as consolidating starting conditions, strengthening catalytic leadership, improving institutional design, and optimizing collaborative processes, in order to provide high reference value for radio regulatory in major events.