作為明代“篇海系”字書的經典之作，趙欽湯、李登的《重刊詳校篇海》（以下簡稱《詳校篇海》）上承《四聲篇海》下啟《字彙》，在中國辭書史上有一定的地位和影響。學界目前對該書的研究尚停留在宏觀的描寫階段，缺乏微觀的深入研究與考證，故本文以該書為研究對象，分六章展開討論。

除第一章緒論外，餘五章為本文研究的主體內容。其中，第二章對《詳校篇海》的整體情況進行了梳理，進一步補充二位作者生平、學術成就等相關內容，對前人研究不詳的版本情況進行了細緻梳理，逐條分析此書凡例並提取作者編輯理念，這對我們後續研究起到了基礎和參考性作用。

第三至五章為本文的核心內容，分《詳校篇海》收字研究、用語研究和與《四聲篇海》釋義對比研究等三個專題。

第一個專題是該書的收字研究。著重研究了學界很少關注的本書的742個新收字。本文研究發現，從來源上看，這批新收字絕大多數源於前代或同時代字書，主要見於《集韻》系字書，還有少部分源於宋明時代文獻典籍和社會流俗用字。與《四聲篇海》相比，該書對音義不全、不合字理、楷化失真的古文以及釋道藏字等進行了大幅度刪減，作者有著明確的規範統一字形和整理汉字系统的意识,故收字體例更為清晰嚴謹，所收之字追求音義俱全，同時具有從古、遵時的特點。

第二個專題是該書的用語研究。整體上，該書的用語多襲自前代字書，但其中的一個用語“詳”則頗具特色，本專題即以此展開研究。“詳”是一個專門用於溝通主、副條的辭書學用語。從功能上看，主、副條字頭可以是存在字際關係的兩個字，也可以構成一個聯綿詞。作者在設置主、副條字頭標準時，將見於《說文》、符合字理的、完整的字形以及社會通行的簡化字作為主條，將未見於《說文》、不合字理的俗訛字、省形等作為副條。該用語的設置避免了重複釋義，提高字書的實用性，同時對現代辭書設置主、副條字頭亦有參考價值。

第三個專題是《詳校篇海》與《四聲篇海》釋義對比研究。文章首先選取《詳校篇海》中較《四聲篇海》在釋義上進行增補、改動、刪除的150組字，將其分為五大類11小類28種進行細緻的分析與考證。研究發現，與《四聲篇海》相比，在增義方面，作者積極吸收了前代和同時代訓詁和辭書編纂成果，圍繞該書實用性，新增時俗常用義的同時，還增補了詞語在發展過程中新產生的意義和同形而不同詞的新義，以及更為通俗易懂的同義訓釋等。在改義方面，該書一是把《四聲篇海》錯誤釋義改正確，二是把不確切的訓釋改準確。在刪義方面，該書主要刪除了《四聲篇海》中的錯誤義項、重複義項和臨時借於他詞的義項。通過作者的上述一系列處理，使得該書釋義更為準確、實用和完備。值得一提的是，本文對二書的釋義進行對比和考證時所系聯起來的是一個字條在歷代字書中的存現狀況，這對研究字書在傳抄發展過程中的優劣得失有重要借鑒作用。

通過對上述三大主題的深入研究，我們發現，《詳校篇海》在收字、用語和釋義等諸多方面均體現出了鮮明的“從古遵時”的特點。可見，《詳校篇海》是一部具有從古傾向，同時又有著鮮明時代特征的實用性字書。

最後一章，文章從正、反兩方面對該書進行了評價。通過考察後代字書對該書的引用情況，重新審視《詳校篇海》在字書史上的重要地位。

 As a classic dictionary of the"Pianhai(篇海)Series"in the Ming Dynasty.Xiangjiao Pianhai（《詳校篇海》）written by Zhao Qintang and Li Deng,Serves as a connecting link betweenSisheng Pianhai（《四聲篇海》）andZihui（《字彙》）. It has a certain status and influence in the history of Chinese dictionaries. The current academic research on the book is still at the stage of macro description, lacking in-depth micro research and textual research, so this article takes the book as the research object and discusses it in six chapters.

In addition to the introduction of the first chapter, the remaining five chapters are the main content of this article. Among them, the second chapter sorts out the overall situation ofXiangjiao Pianhai, supplements the lives and academic conditions of the two authors. Sort out the versions of this book, which the predecessors did not study clearly. Analyze the legends of the book one by one and extract the author’s editorial philosophy. This has played a basic and reference role for our following research.

The third to fifth chapters are the core content of this article, which are divided into three topics: the study on the collected characters in this book, the study of phraseology of this book and the comparative study of interpretation withSisheng Pianhai.

The first topic is the study on the collected characters in this book. Focuses on the 742 newly collected characters which are less concerned by the academic circles. From the point of view of source, most of these newly collected characters originated from previous or contemporary dictionaries, mainly found in the"Jiyunseries"of dictionaries, and a small number of them were derived from the literature and classics of the Song and Ming Dynasties and popular social characters. Compared withSisheng Pianhai, this book has greatly deleted the characters which with incomplete pronunciation and meaning, not in accordance with the principle, and distorted regularization, as well as Taoist and Tibetan characters. The book has a clear awareness of standardizing and unifying Chinese Characters and organizing Chinese character system. The idea of arranging Chinese characters is clearer and more rigorous, and the collected characters pursue comprehensive pronunciation and meaning, and have the characteristics of antiquity and observance of the times.

The second topic is the study of phraseology of this book. We have noticed the distinctive term"xiang（詳）"in the book. "xiang" is a dictionary term specifically used to communicate the main and sub-clauses. From a functional point of view, the prefixes of the main and sub-clauses can be two characters with an inter-character relationship, or they can form a continuous word. When the author sets the standard for the main and sub-clauses, they will choose the characters founded inShuowen, the correct, the complete, and the simplified characters and commonly used characters in the society as the main clause. In contrast of these is the sub-clause. The setting of the term avoids repeated interpretations, improves the practicability of the book, and also has reference value for the setting of the main and sub-clauses of modern dictionaries.

The third topic is a comparative study on the interpretation ofXiangjiao PianhaiandSisheng Pianhai. We make a detailed analysis and textual research on more than 150 definitions, which are added, changed and deleted in the book. The study found that compared withSisheng Pianhai, in terms of adding meanings, the author actively absorbed the results of the exegesis and dictionary compilation of the previous and contemporary generations. Focusing on the practicality of the book, while adding the common meanings of the times, it also added the new meanings and homomorphic meanings of the words in the development process, and new interpretations of different words which are easier to understand. In terms of correcting the meaning, the book corrects the incorrect interpretation ofSisheng Pianhai, and also corrects the inaccurate interpretation. In terms of deleting the meaning, the book mainly deleted the erroneous meanings, duplicate meanings and meanings temporarily borrowed from other words inSisheng Pianhai. It is worth mentioning that when comparing and verifying the interpretation of the two books, this article is linked to the existence of a note in the history of dictionary, which is an important reference for the study of the dictionaries in the process of copying.

Through in-depth research on the three themes mentioned above, we have found thatXiangjiao Pianhaiembodies the distinctive characteristics of "antiquity and observance of the times" in many aspects. It can be seen thatXiangjiao Pianhaiis a practical calligraphy book that has a tendency from ancient times and at the same time has distinct characteristics of the times.

In the last chapter, the article evaluates the book from both positive and negative aspects. By examining the citations of the later generations of dictionaries, the important position ofXiangjiao Pianhaiin the history should be re-examined.