在我国推进社会治理体系和治理能力现代化的背景下，政府通过项目购买方式，将专业社会工作服务引入社区。通过推动社工站建设，可以发挥社会工作在社区多元治理中的专业作用，提升基层民政服务水平，打通为民服务“最后一米”。同时社工站参与社区治理实践，也有助于完善我国社会工作本土化理论。因此，本研究聚焦L市F社区社工站参与社区治理的发展现状，以实地调研的方式收集资料，围绕场域理论的三个核心要素“场域、资本、惯习”建构了一个分析框架，探究影响社工站参与社区治理的因素及原因，探讨如何使社工站更有效地参与社区治理。

  本研究主体部分是第二、三、四章，描述了社工站发展的优势、弱势及原因。第二章从场域的角度进行分析，发现社工站在参与社区治理中与政府街道办事处、居委会、社区居民存在特定互动关系且各主体在政策、资源、服务目标和服务需求上对社工站发展都有推动作用，同时各主体在互动过程中由于体制机制不健全、服务角度差异以及居民对社会工作认知缺失等问题也成为了社工站发展的阻力。第三章从资本的角度分析，发现社工站在进入社区时自身携带有文化资本和社会资本优势，在互动过程中各主体期望进行资本的巩固和转换，从而达到竞争合适场域位置的机会，但社工站目前由于经济资本来源有限、文化资本优势不足、社会资本积累缓慢以及符号资本彰显式微的原因，整体处于实践场域的弱势地位。第四章从惯习的角度分析，发现社工站开展服务的行为逻辑是依据社会工作者在社工价值理念、方法和伦理方面所习得的惯习，虽然惯习可以改变和重新习得，但由于社工站专业价值与实践行动间的张力、社工站角色定位模糊以及自身能力局限性等问题一定程度上限制着社工站在功能的发挥。最后，基于上述分析，本研究在实践理性层面进行了进一步探索，提出了搭建权责清晰的实践场域、探索场域多元资本、建构本土专业惯习的实践思路，以期促进社工站在社区治理中发挥专业优势，回应居民对于多样化、精准化服务的需求。

  In the context of promoting the modernization of the social governance system and governance capacity in my country, the government has introduced professional social work services into the community through project purchases. By promoting the construction of social work stations, the professional role of social work in community multi-governance can be brought into play, the level of grass-roots civil affairs services can be improved, and the "last meter" of serving the people can be opened up. At the same time, the participation of social work stations in the practice of community governance also helps to improve the theory of localization of social work in my country. Therefore, this research focuses on the development status of the social work station of the F community in L city participating in community governance, collects data by means of field research, and constructs an analytical framework around the three core elements of field theory, "field, capital, and habit". Explore the factors and reasons that affect the social work station's participation in community governance, and explore how to make the social work station participate in community governance more effectively.

  The main part of this research is the second, third and fourth chapters, which describe the advantages, disadvantages and reasons for the development of social work stations. The second chapter analyzes from the perspective of the field, and finds that the social work station has a specific interactive relationship with the government sub-district offices, neighborhood committees, and community residents in participating in community governance, and each subject has a specific interaction with the social work station in terms of policies, resources, service goals and service needs. Development has a driving effect. At the same time, in the process of interaction between various subjects, problems such as imperfect systems and mechanisms, differences in service perspectives, and residents' lack of awareness of social work have also become obstacles to the development of social work stations. The third chapter analyzes from the perspective of capital, and finds that social workers have the advantages of cultural capital and social capital when they enter the community. In the process of interaction, each subject expects to consolidate and convert capital, so as to achieve the opportunity to compete for a suitable field position. However, the social work station is currently in a weak position in the field of practice due to the limited sources of economic capital, the lack of cultural capital advantages, the slow accumulation of social capital, and the decline of symbolic capital. The fourth chapter analyzes from the perspective of habitus and finds that the behavioral logic of social work station services is based on the habitus that social workers have acquired in terms of social work values, methods and ethics. Although habitus can be changed and re-acquired, Due to the tension between the professional value and practical actions of the social work station, the ambiguous role positioning of the social work station and the limitation of its own abilities, the functions of the social work station are limited to a certain extent. Finally, based on the above analysis, this research further explores the level of practical rationality, and proposes the practical ideas of building a practice field with clear rights and responsibilities, exploring multiple capitals in the field, and constructing local professional habits, in order to promote social workers to stand in community governance It will give full play to its professional advantages and respond to residents' needs for diversified and precise services.