《书目答问》是张之洞任四川学政期间，为改善蜀地学风、总结清代学术成果、回答诸生关于读书之疑而主持编撰的一部举要目录。该书一经面世，便迅速成为承学之士求索研读的热门书目，百四十余年间，不仅产生了数十种版本，还形成了数量可观的整理和研究成果。本文旨在对以往整理研究《答问》的诸成果的内容、方法、价值进行系统、全面梳理和探讨。

第一章论述《答问》的流传及研究历程。首先，从匡正学风、总结学术两个层面论述该书产生的背景，并按照酝酿、草创、笔削裁定、初刻、修订重刻五个阶段，论述出《答问》具体编纂刊印过程，顺便考辨素有争议的撰者问题，又从目录学、版本学、学术史三个层面探讨该书的学术文化价值。其次，论述《答问》的流传和版本情况，指出各大图书馆在版本认定上的失误，并论述《答问》对书业、教育界、学术界的影响。最后，按照《答问》研究的实际发展情况，勾勒《答问》研究整理成果三个历史阶段的发展轨迹。

第二章考察《答问》的校正型成果。论述《答问》在收录、著录、分类、排序方面的失误之处，并分析导致失误的原因。再以个案研究的形式，对王秉恩贵阳校刻本、赵祖铭《书目答问校勘记》、叶德辉《书目答问斠补》系列这三种早期校正《答问》的重要成果的形成过程及具体内容进行论述。再重点结合至今所有主要校正成果，归纳学者们在校勘过程中采用的径改、校勘记、批注、序言等四种记录体例，探讨诸成果如何恰当使用校勘四法来校正《答问》，指出校正型成果具有为《答问》纠正谬误，丰富并改善其所列典籍基本信息和版本的学术价值。

第三章考察《答问》的增补型成果。以吕幼樵《书目答问校补》、徐扬杰《书目答问补订》、孙文泱《增订书目答问补正》三种成果为研究对象，归纳其所补《答问》书籍条目版本的具体类型，分析论述增补版本工作的特点与不足。其次，以佚名《书目答问补》、范希曾《书目答问补正》、内藤湖南《书目答问（史部）补正》三部主要为《答问》补录未收及新出书的成果为对象，考察其补录的形式、内容，分析其补录的学术价值及文化取向。最后，专论江人度《书目答问笺补》一书，论述该书的作者、成书、版本，重点对这部特殊的增补型成果的体例进行分析，从目录学层面上揭示该书的价值功用。

第四章以个案研究的形式，对现有的两部汇注汇补型成果加以考论。一是王伯祥《书目答问补正（批注本）》。先结合王氏生平叙述其收藏、研习《答问》的历程，重点通过对王伯祥、陈乃乾、郑振铎日记的爬梳，还原其汇录诸家批语于所藏《补正》之上的具体过程。其次，通过考证指出国家图书馆所藏朱墨批校本《答问》正是胡玉缙批注本，即王氏汇录的来源之一，并以此本与王批《补正》相应内容的比对，论述王氏的过录特点。最后，总结王批《补正》的学术价值及存在的缺陷。二是来新夏等《书目答问汇补》。论述该书的编撰、出版过程的四个阶段。再讨论该书的体例、具体内容，并从汇补层面上总结其所呈现出的两大特点，即所汇成果类型多样、内容丰富，涵盖较全面；重视汇补层次与先后次序，方便读者利用。最后探讨该书的集成作用与不足之处。

第五章考论《答问》的专题研究型成果。从成书相关研究、文献学专学研究、学术思想研究、文化教育作用研究四个领域论述专题性研究的主要成果，揭示其主要观点和研究路径。并进一步总结归纳专题性研究在解决争论议题、完善校补疏漏、反思“共识性”观点、增强学术史意识、关注边缘化内容、开拓研究新视野等方面所具有的独到价值与意义。

结语总结了百余年来《答问》整理研究的基本成就和主要贡献。

Shu Mu Da Wen（《书目答问》）was compiled by Zhang Zhidong during his tenure as a scholarly administrator in Sichuan. This catalogue was compiled to improve the academic atmosphere in Sichuan, summarize the academic achievements of the Qing Dynasty, and answer the queries of students about their studies. The book quickly became a popular source of research and study for scholars. And over the past hundred and forty years, it has not only produced dozens of editions, but also a considerable amount of collations and research results. The purpose of this dissertation is to systematically and comprehensively review and discuss the content, methodology, and value of the previous studies of the Shu Mu Da Wen.

The first chapter discusses the circulation and research history of the Shu Mu Da Wen. Firstly, it discusses the background of the book from two aspects: correcting the academic atmosphere and summarizing the scholarship, and discusses the specific compilation and printing process of the Shu Mu Da Wen according to five stages: conception, creation, ruling, first engraving, and revision and reengraving, and incidentally examines the controversial issue of the author. The academic and cultural value of the book is discussed from three aspects: bibliography, edition studies and academic history. Secondly, it clarifies the system of extant editions of the Shu Mu Da Wen and the path of its dissemination, points out the mistakes made by major libraries in identifying the versions, and discusses the impact of the Shu Mu Da Wen on the book industry, education and academia. Finally, the trajectory of the three historical stages in the development of the research and collation of the Shu Mu Da Wen is sketched in the light of the actual development of the study of the Shu Mu Da Wen.

The second chapter is about the revision works of the Shu Mu Da Wen. It discusses the mistakes of the Shu Mu Da Wen in terms of its inclusion, citation, classification and ordering, and analyses the reasons for these errors. Then, in the form of a case study, the process of formation and the specific content of three important early achievements in the correction of the Shu Mu Da Wen, namely Wang Bing'en's edition（王秉恩贵阳校刻本）, Zhao Zuming's Shu Mu Da Wen Jiao Kan Ji（赵祖铭《书目答问校勘记》）, and Ye Dehui's Shu Mu Da Wen Jiao Bu series（叶德辉《书目答问斠补》系列）, are discussed. It then focuses on the four types of records used by scholars in the process of proofreading, including the path correction, proofreading notes, annotations, and prefaces, and discusses how these results appropriately used the four methods of proofreading to correct the Shu Mu Da Wen , pointing out that the proofreading results have the scholarly value of correcting errors in the Shu Mu Da Wen and enriching and improving the basic information and editions of the canonical texts listed in it.

The third chapter discusses the additions to the Shu Mu Da Wen. Taking the three works of Lv Youqiao's Shu Mu Da Wen Jiao Bu（吕幼樵《书目答问校补》）, Xu Yangjie's Shu Mu Da Wen Bu Ding（徐扬杰《书目答问补订》）, and Sun Wenyang's Zeng Ding Shu Mu Da Wen Bu Zheng（孙文泱《增订书目答问补正》） as the research objects, it summarizes the specific types of editions of book entries in the Shu Mu Da Wen, and analyses the characteristics and shortcomings of the work of adding editions. Secondly, Shu Mu Da Wen Bu（《书目答问补》）, Fan Xizeng's Shu Mu Da Wen Bu Zheng（范希曾《书目答问补正》）, and Naito Konan’s Shu Mu Da Wen Shi Bu Bu Zheng（内藤湖南《书目答问（史部）补正》） are used to examine the form and content of their supplements, and to analyse the academic value and cultural orientation of their supplements. Finally, it is devoted to Jiang Rendu's Shu Mu Da Wen JIan Bu （江人度《书目答问笺补》）, discussing its authorship, publication, and edition, focusing on the style of this particular supplement, and revealing the value and utility of the book from a cataloguing perspective.

The fourth chapter takes the form of a case study, examining two works of the existing repertory of annotations and supplements. The first case is Wang Boxiang's Shu Mu Da Wen Bu Zheng(Annotated version)（王伯祥《书目答问补正（批注本）》）. Firstly, in this part, it describes Wang's collection and study of the Shu Mu Da Wen in the context of his life. By the diaries of Wang Boxiang, Chen Naiqian, and Zheng Zhenduo, the process of Wang's transcribing the annotations of many scholars onto his own book is restored. Secondly, through the examination, it is pointed out that the Red and Black annotated version of the Shu Mu Da Wen in the National Library is one of the sources of Wang's repertory, i.e. Hu YuJin's（胡玉缙）annotated version, and the comparison between this version and the corresponding contents of Wang's book discusses the characteristics of Wang's repertory. Finally, the scholarly value of Wang's book and its flaws are summarized. The second case is Lai Xinxia’s Shu Mu Da Wen Hui Bu（来新夏《书目答问汇补》）. Here we first discusses the four stages of the book's compilation and publication process. It then discusses the style and specific contents of the book, and summarises the two main features it presents at the level of repertory, namely, the diversity and richness of the repertory, which is more comprehensiveness, and the importance attached to the hierarchy and sequence of the repertory, which makes it easier for readers to use. Finally, the book's role in integration and its shortcomings are discussed.

The fifth chapter discusses the thematic research-based works of the Shu Mu Da Wen. It discusses the main results of thematic research in four areas: research related to the book, bibliographic specialization, scholarly thought, and research on the role of culture and education, revealing its main ideas and research paths. It further summarizes the unique value and significance of thematic research in resolving controversial issues, improving proofreading, reflecting on "consensus" views, enhancing awareness of academic history, focusing on marginalized contents, and opening up new research horizons.

The concluding section summarizes the basic achievements and major contributions of the research on the Shu Mu Da Wen over the past hundred years.