标准竞争已经成为继价格竞争、品牌竞争后的主要市场竞争模式，尤其是在高新技术领域，标准竞争实际上已经成为一种领导权的竞争。互联网标准竞争集中在技术标准领域，技术中包含的知识产权尤其是专利权作为一种合法的垄断权，一旦与标准相结合，就会使标准也具有一定的市场垄断属性，这与标准具有的公益性产生了冲突：制定和实施标准的目的是为了协调社会资源的合理配置，缩小产品差异化、减少生产成本、提高生产效率；可标准一旦与知识产权相结合，企业就可以依据标准中知识产权的合法垄断性拒绝对外许可标准中包含的技术信息，实际情况是，大多数拥有技术标准的企业都会凭借标准与知识产权结合而形成的市场支配地位拒绝许可或者以不合理的条件许可标准中包含的技术信息，而这类技术信息又往往是其他企业进入相关市场的条件和门槛。这种滥用市场支配地位的行为当然要受到反垄断法的规制，但是如何平衡知识产权的私益性和标准的公益性，是强调知识产权保护的重要性以维护权利人的合法垄断权还是注重保护市场而适用反垄断法规制这类行为，是本文需要解决的重要问题。由于互联网市场存在作用强大的网络效应，以及互补品市场的发展，使其与传统商品市场有很大的不同。互联网市场的公益性要更加突出，知识的共享以及技术的开放对于促进互联网的健康发展更加重要。因此很多企业都会通过主动共享技术信息比如开源运动来促进技术的共享与竞争，从而促进自身的发展；同时，美国法院在某些案例中对逆向工程的认可也说明当今的互联网市场更加强调知识以及技术的共享进而促进良性竞争。本文试图找到对标准的知识产权保护与反垄断法规制的平衡点，并尝试适用强制许可制度与核心设施理论来规制大量存在的利用标准中知识产权拒绝对外许可的滥用市场支配地位行为。 本文分为四部分，第一部分对标准、标准竞争以及互联网领域的标准竞争做出概念界定和简要叙述；第二部分将知识产权与反垄断法进行比较分析，指出二者的一致与冲突，为解决两者的矛盾奠定基础；第三部分将分析互联网市场的新特征，以及这些新特征对标准的知识产权保护与反垄断规制的影响；最后一部分从企业自身及知识产权法和反垄断法角度出发，分析指出互联网标准竞争中应以知识的共享及技术的竞争为重点。

Standard competition, especially in the high-tech field, has become a kind of important competition model after competition of price and brand. Actually, it is the competition of leadership. Standard competition of the Internet focuses on technology standard which includes intellectual property (patent). The standard will hold the market because intellectual property is legal monoply. However, there is a sort of public welfare in the standard and it aims at having one market. The aim of formulating standard is rationally allocating resources in society, reducing the gap, decreasing the production cost and bringing the level of operating efficiency up. So the standard should be open to the outside. Actually, the standard which is coupled with intellectual property is monopolistic as well as exoteric. At this time, firms may refuse to license because of the legal monopoly, which is inconsistent to it’ s public welfare. Most of the firms which possess standard intend to refuse to license the patent which is important to others by its dominant market position, and the know-how informationis the requirement accessing to market. The abusing of dominant market position should be regulated by anti-trust law, but there is a kind of contradiction between intellectual property and anti-trust law, which is should be solved in this article.The network effects and complements make the Internet market difference with the traditional market. The public welfare of the Internet becomes more important and it’s helpful to the Internet development by sharing knowledge and technology. As a result, companies will share their information by opening source in order to promote themselves. As well, the US court’s approval to reverse engineering confirm that the Internet market intent to sharing information. This article tent to find a balance point between intellectual property and anti-trust law and try to regulate the abusing of dominant market position by obligatory licence and essential equipment theory.The article will be divided into four parts. The first part will start with introduction of standard and standard competition. The second chapter focuses on the contradiction and coherence of intellectual property and anti-trust law. And then, we will share the new characters of the Internet market and the influence that bring. At last, we should clear that the most important is sharing of information in the Internet market.