全球数字经济的快速发展使信息的流动更加方便、快捷，个人信息受到滥用的风险更为突出。我国宪法保护作为未列举基本权利的个人信息。个人信息彰显公民的人格尊严以及自由，大数据时代更需强化对国家不当利用个人信息的防御，在立法层面于多个领域对个人信息予以保护，并统一在宪法的整体秩序中。2017年6月1日起施行的《网络安全法》对个人信息保护作出了一系列相关规定。个人信息保护是公民的基本权利，应受到法律保护。同时，公民个人信息保护防御来自政府的不当收集以及滥用。文章从网络安全的角度对公民个人信息保护进行了相关分析，由立法层面对其进行保护，明确公权力对个人信息介入的界限，平衡个人信息利用与保护之间的利益关系使公民权利获得更好的保障。 本文的正文主要涉及四个部分。第一部分阐述了个人信息保护的概况。对个人信息的涵义、分类，个人信息的保护范围作了梳理与界定。第二部分论述了个人信息保护的宪法依据。文章分别讨论了美国和德国个人信息权的形成与发展过程，并分析了我国个人信息保护的宪法依据，认为从人权保障的理念能够推导出对个人信息的保护，我国应首先确立“人性尊严”宪法规范的价值理念。第三部分撰写了个人信息保护与网络安全之间的冲突。权利不是绝对的，在涉及公共安全的条件下，个人信息权需要作出让步。当然，网络安全不能成为国家干涉个人信息的理由，国家公权力与个人信息保护的界限需要格外重视并在具体问题中详细分析。公权力介入个人信息保护需要通过合宪性审查，审查的方式运用了比例原则。此外，还应遵循法律保留原则、法的明确性原则的要求。第四部分内容包括我国当前个人信息的立法现状、保护的不足及成因以及可行的解决方案。同时，分析了政府信息公开与个人信息保护间的关系。在信息公开的过程中政府有责任对于个人信息作必要的保护。

The rapid development of the global digital economy makes the flow of information more convenient and faster, and the risk of abuse of personal information is more prominent. China's constitutional protection ACTS as a personal information that does not enumerate basic rights. Personal information reveal of the citizen's human dignity and freedom, uncle according to time more need to strengthen the defense of the country's improper use of personal information, at the legislative level of individual information to outback in multiple fields, and unified in the constitution of the whole order. The cyber security act, which takes effect on June 1, 2017, has made a series of relevant provisions on the protection of personal information. The protection of personal information is the basic right of citizens and should be protected by law. At the same time, citizen's personal information protection defense comes from the government's improper collection and abuse. From the Angle of network security to protect citizens' personal information has carried on the correlation analysis, from the legislative level, to end their protected status clearly the boundaries of public power to the personal information involved in, balance the interests of the relationship between protection and utilization of personal information to civil rights for better security. The text of this article mainly involves four parts. The first part expounds the general situation of personal information protection. The definition, classification and protection of personal information are sorted out and defined. The second part discusses the constitutional basis of personal information protection. Article discussed the formation and development of the United States and Germany right of personal information process, and analyzes the constitutional basis of personal information protection in China, the thought is derived from the concept of human rights protection to the protection of personal information, we should first establish the value concept of "human dignity" of constitution. The third part is about the conflict between personal information protection and public security. Rights are not absolute, and personal information rights need to be compromised under the conditions of public safety. Of course, public security cannot be a reason for the state to interfere with personal information. The boundaries of state power and personal information protection need to be paid special attention and analyzed in detail in specific problems. The protection of public power in personal information needs to be examined by constitutionality and the principle of proportionality is applied. In addition, the principle of legal reservation and the principle of clarity of law should be followed. The fourth part includes the current legislation status of personal information in China, the insufficient protection and the causes and feasible solutions. At the same time, the relationship between government information disclosure and personal information protection is analyzed. In the process of information disclosure, the government is responsible for the necessary protection of personal information.