随着国民生活水平的提高，机动车等特殊动产买卖等十分常见，且特殊动产相对于普通动产价值更高昂，一般的房产等不动产价值亦远不如特殊动产中的船舶和航空器，所以《民法典》对特殊动产的登记对抗规则作出了专门的规定。但这一规定却引起了学界对登记性质、特殊动产物权变动的逻辑体系等问题上的争议。
      分歧主要在于，第一，特殊动产的物权变动是否依循普通动产交付生效的原则；第二，登记的性质以及在登记与交付呈现不同状态时，登记与交付的关系的确定；第三，在登记对抗规则中到底如何具体来界定善意第三人。因而，应当对物权变动生效与对抗进行法律逻辑推演，以期获得更贴合法律逻辑和立法目的的结果。本文梳理争议理论，并将理论与司法实际结合，从现实角度看理论价值。
      本文全文共四章，第一章从立法现状和学理争议的角度出发，分别阐述特殊动产物权变动的模式，并论述交付生效加登记对抗的合理性。第二章阐述登记对抗主义理论，讨论登记对抗主义下登记的性质以及登记与交付的关系，论述登记的最高对抗效力。第三章从客观方面和主观方面对善意第三人进行界定，并根据物权优先于债权的法理论证出让人的债权人不属于善意第三人的范围。第四章从司法实际出发，在实践中审视登记对抗规则和理论。

      With the improvement of national living standards, the sale of special movable property such as motor vehicles is very common. Therefore, the civil code has made special provisions on the registration confrontation rules of special movable property. However, these provisions have caused disputes in the academic world on the nature of registration and the logical system of the change of special movable property rights.
      The main differences are: first, whether the change of real right of special movable property obeys the principle of becoming effective upon the delivery of ordinary movable property; Second, the nature of registration and the determination of the relationship between registration and delivery when they show different states; Third, how to define the bona fide third party in the registration confrontation rules. Therefore, it is necessary to deduce the legal logic of the effectiveness and confrontation of the change of real right, in order to obtain the results logically and legally. This paper combs the dispute theory, combines the theory with judicial practice, and looks at the theoretical value from a practical point of view.
      This paper consists of four chapters. The first chapter expounds the mode of the change of the real right of special movable property from the perspective of the current legislative situation and academic disputes, and discusses the rationality of delivery effectiveness plus registration confrontation. The second chapter expounds the theory of registration antagonism, discusses the nature of registration under registration antagonism and the relationship between registration and delivery, and discusses the highest antagonism effect of registration. The third chapter defines the bona fide third party from the objective and subjective aspects, and demonstrates that the transferor's creditor does not belong to the bona fide third party according to the legal principle that real right has priority over creditor's right. The fourth chapter examines the registration confrontation rules and theories in practice from the judicial reality.