国际商事仲裁在经济高速发展的前提下以其高效性和独立性越来越成为国际社会上商人们处理商事纠纷的首选方式。然而，由于仲裁程序等瑕疵，仲裁庭所做出的仲裁裁决在特定情况下也可因当事人的申请而被撤销。国际商事仲裁裁决撤销的具体条文是由国内法确定，因此在不同国家和地区，该项制度的具体条款也不尽相同。对比不同国家的规定，可以看出各国立法体系和对于国际商事活动态度的差异，进而延伸到不同法系对国内法的影响。本文选取中国和香港地区仲裁制度中关于撤销裁决的规定进行比较研究，再结合部分国际惯例和别国国内法，找出我国裁决撤销制度的利弊，并最终为优化该制度提出一些具有可行性的提议。

International commercial arbitration is one of the most popular methods to solving international commercial disputes on account of its independency and efficiency with the development of economic globalization. However, due to various problems such as arbitral procedural defect, the award of international commercial arbitration could be revoked by court with application of the parties under certain circumstances. The rules regarding revocation of international commercial arbitration are part of domestic laws of a country, so they are not the same in different countries and regions. This thesis compares such rules in mainland of China and Hong Kong with international practice and domestic laws of some other countries to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the rules of revocation of international commercial arbitration in China and try to put forward some feasible advice in this field to perfect such rules.