随着互联网的普及与计算机信息技术的进步，互联网产业尤其是游戏产业在飞速发展的同时，虚拟财产这一新兴事物应运而生，侵犯虚拟财产犯罪也伴随其滋生。侵犯虚拟财产的犯罪模式较为复杂，造成社会危害性较大，已逐渐成为不容小觑的社会问题。而在司法实践中，通过对我国108起侵犯虚拟财产犯罪案件及裁判文书的整理，可以得出该类案件的司法现状如下：一是案件数量总体较少但呈增长态势；二是犯罪手段以借助计算机网络为主，同时存在其他多种方式；三是犯罪对象种类多样化，主要集中在游戏领域；四是罪名认定存在一个显著时间变化节点与两个特殊节点；五是多为共同犯罪，被害单位逾四成；六是一审变更指控罪名率、二审案件改判率较高。

在侵犯虚拟财产犯罪的司法现状基础上进行深入研究后，可以发现当前我国虚拟财产犯罪在司法适用中存在诸多问题，主要体现在虚拟财产的性质认定不统一、侵犯行为认定与处理不统一以及侵犯虚拟财产的数额认定与处置不统一等方面。这不仅给犯罪分子创造了轻判乃至脱罪的可乘之机，也对司法机关的相关工作造成了极大阻碍，严重影响了司法的公平与效率。究其背后成因，这些都是社会、法律与技术等方面因素共同的映射，主要包括虚拟财产的社会认识偏差与其价值存在不确定性、虚拟财产法律规范滞后与法律属性理论分歧严重以及相关技术不成熟等具体原因。

当下，侵犯虚拟财产犯罪在司法适用中的问题亟需解决，因此本文针对性地提出了如下解决对策，以期为该类犯罪的刑法规制提供参考，从而改善司法适用现状：一是以明确虚拟财产法律地位与“数据”“财产”双重法律属性为核心，走颁布指导案例、出台司法解释、修正刑法法条的渐进式道路；二是以厘清侵犯虚拟财产的行为类型与性质为关键，用财产犯罪规制所有侵犯虚拟财产行为；三是以明晰虚拟财产价值评估与处置为保障，根据被害主体与受侵犯虚拟财产的不同区别价值评估方式，同时建立虚拟财产专门处置系统。

With the popularity of the Internet and the advancement of computer information technology, the Internet industry, especially the rapid development of the game industry at the same time, virtual property, an emerging thing also came into being, the crime of infringement of virtual property also grows along with it. This criminal model is relatively complex, causing great harm to society, and has gradually become a social problem that cannot be underestimated. In judicial practice, through the collation of 108 cases of crimes against virtual property and judgment documents in China, the judicial status of such cases can be derived as follows: First, the overall number of cases is small but growing; Second, the criminal method is mainly with the help of computer networks, and there are many other ways at the same time; Third, the types of criminal targets are diversified, mainly concentrated in the field of games; Fourth, the crime was found to have one significant time change node and two special nodes; Fifth, most of them committed joint crimes, and more than 40% of the victims were in the unit; Sixth, the rate of changing charges in the first instance and the rate of changing sentences in second-instance cases is relatively high.

After in-depth research on the current judicial status of infringement of virtual property, it can be found that there are many problems in the judicial application of the current virtual property crimes in China, mainly reflected in the inconsistent determination of the nature of virtual property, the inconsistency in the identification and handling of infringement, and the inconsistent determination and disposal of the amount of infringement of virtual property. This not only creates opportunities for criminals to take advantage of light sentences or even to get away with crimes, but also causes great obstacles to the work of judicial organs and seriously affects the fairness and efficiency of justice. The reasons behind this are the mapping of social, legal and technical factors, mainly including the social understanding bias of virtual property and the uncertainty of its value, the lagging legal regulation of virtual property and the serious disagreement of legal attribute theory as well as the immaturity of related technology.

At present, the problems in the judicial application of crimes against virtual property need to be solved urgently, so this paper puts forward the following countermeasures in order to provide reference for the criminal law regime of such crimes and improve the current situation of judicial application: First, to clarify the legal status of virtual property and the dual legal attributes of "data" and "property" as the core, and take the progressive path of promulgating guiding cases, issuing judicial interpretations and amending criminal law articles; Second, to clarify the types and nature of acts of infringement of virtual property as the key, and use property crimes to regulate all acts of infringement of virtual property; Third, to clarify the value assessment and disposal of virtual property as a guarantee, according to the different value assessment methods of the victim subject and the victimized virtual property, and establish a special disposal system for virtual property.