中文题名: | 1935年北平私立中学男女分校风波述论 |
姓名: | |
学科代码: | 030204 |
学科专业: | |
学生类型: | 硕士 |
学位: | 法学硕士 |
学位年度: | 2015 |
校区: | |
学院: | |
研究方向: | 中国共产党与中国社会现代化 |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师单位: | |
提交日期: | 2015-06-16 |
答辩日期: | 2015-05-28 |
外文题名: | THE DISCNSSION ABOUT THE STORM OF PEIPING SEGREGATED EDUCATION IN THE PRIVATE MIDDLE SCHOOL IN 1935 |
中文摘要: |
国运兴衰,系于教育。男女同校是教育平等的重要表现。长期以来,中国封建传统思想中提倡的是“男尊女卑”、“女子无才便是德”,女性一直被拒绝在学校大门之外。五四新文化运动后,思想上的解放推动教育上的革新,小学男女同校、大学开“女禁”逐渐成为普遍现象。中学男女同校却一直是个敏感的问题,成为最后一个被攻破的堡垒。1921年北京高等师范附属中学增设女子部,成为最早一批实行男女同校的中学。然而,北平的中学男女同校之路并不顺利,经常遭到保守者的反对。 1935年,时任北平市长的袁良在市政府会议上以整顿风化、繁荣北平为由,决定取缔北平私立中学男女同校,实行男女分校。此项提案经决议通过后立即在当时社会上引起轩然大波。私立中学与北平市政府针锋相对,激烈较量,私立中学抗议示威,并致电教育部请求给予支持;北平当局也表示绝不妥协,坚持到底。再加上社会各界的态度不一,教育界的支持与反对,女学生的担忧,妇女界的强烈抗议……这使得事件不断发酵,情节跌宕。随着私立中学与妇女界抗议活动的高涨,教育部迫于舆论压力,不得不插手干预。经过中间人调停,北平市政府与私立中学相互妥协,达成解决方案,然而这些解决方案却在实施中以不了了之而告终。 回顾1935年北平私立中学男女分校的这场风波,有不少问题值得探究。男女分校之所以没能彻底实行,原因在于:一是有悖于教育规律;二是不符合私中实际;三是不利于妇女解放;四是有碍于政局稳定。这场风波从表面上看只是北平市政府与私立中学之间的较量,但在本质上却是当时社会中进步与保守思想之间的矛盾与冲突,在对待男女同校与社会风化问题上体现了人们思想观念中的革新与固守,也反映出北平市政府在政策制定与实施中的诸多问题。这些问题不仅过去有,今天依旧存在。在据此风波80年之后的今天,再次传出“中学男女分校”的声音,一些学校还进行了尝试。时代在变幻,中学男女分校情况也大不一样,不能再用老眼光看新问题。在未来的一段时间里,应当适度鼓励发展一定数量的单性中学,但也不能大规模发展男女分校,使之成为中国教育的主流。
﹀
|
外文摘要: |
The key to the development of the country lies in education. Coeducation is an important manifestation of gender equality in education.For a long time, China feudal traditional thought is advocated in that "women are inferior to men", or "innocence is the virtue for women". So women have been brutally rejected outside the school gate. After the New Culture Movement, thought liberation promote reform in education, as a result, coeducation became a common phenomenon in primary school and university. Out of the conservatives, opposition, coeducation in middle school was the last captured fort. Beijing Higher Normal Affiliated Middle School put up The ministry of women in 1921, which was the first batch of coeducation middle school. However, It was very difficult in Peiping that promoted the development of the coeducation in middle school. In order to improve the social atmosphere and promote the prosperity of Peiping ,the Peking mayor Yuan Liang proposed to ban municipal Peking coeducational private schools in the Peiping meeting in 1935. After the proposal it caused an uproar at the time resolution immediately. Peiping government and private schools increasingly extreme views of the two sides outdone. The private middle school not only took measures of protests and demonstrations,but also telegraphed to the Education Bureau. Yet the Education Bureau said never compromise and never concede. There were different attitudes in the community, some support, some against.Especially education sector and women launched violent protests so that incidents continue to ferment and the plot ups and downs. This storm caused the concern of Nanjing National Government, the Ministry of Education acquiescence from the front to the back felt compelled to stop. After the middlemen of mediation, Peiping government and the private schools compromised and reached solutions. But this solutions failed to complete implementation.Now a review of the Storm of Peiping Segregated Education In The Private Middle School In 1935, the reason for the failure of segregated education is that contrary to the Law of Education, short of the actual situation of private middle school, influence of women's liberation and affect political stability. The storm on the surface is the contest between Peiping government and the private middle school, but in essence is the contradictions and conflicts between the progressive and conservative ideas in the society at that time. It reflects the people's ideas of innovation and stick, it also reflects Peiping government many problems in the policy formulation and implementation. These problems not only in the past, now still exist. Today, the storm 80 years later, the argument between coeducation and segregated education continues to exist,some middle school began to segregated education. The era background is changing, so we cannot look at it with old vision. It should encourage the appropriate development of a number of single-sex secondary schools, but it could not obtain a significant development that become the mainstream of Chinese education.
﹀
|
参考文献总数: | 44 |
馆藏号: | 硕030204/1501 |
开放日期: | 2015-06-16 |