| 中文题名： | 布迪厄“文学场”理论视域下文学作品的创作、传播与接受——以《平凡的世界》为例 |
| 姓名： | |
| 保密级别： | 公开 |
| 论文语种： | 中文 |
| 学科代码： | 050101 |
| 学科专业： | |
| 学生类型： | 学士 |
| 学位： | 文学学士 |
| 学位年度： | 2020 |
| 学校： | 北京师范大学 |
| 校区： | |
| 学院： | |
| 第一导师姓名： | |
| 第一导师单位： | |
| 提交日期： | 2020-06-28 |
| 答辩日期： | 2020-06-28 |
| 外文题名： | The Creation, Dissemination and Acceptance of Literary Works from the Perspective of Bourdieu's "Literature Field" Theory——Taking "The Ordinary World" as an Example |
| 中文关键词： | |
| 外文关键词： | Bourdieu ; Literary Field ; The Ordinary World ; Creation ; Dissemination ; Acceptance |
| 中文摘要： |
本文结合中国语境，辩证借鉴布迪厄“文学场”及其相关概念和理论，采用文本细读和文献阅读方法，对《平凡的世界》的创作、传播和接受历程进行历史的、主客观的调查和分析，并对布迪厄文学场理论展开反思。本文认为文学精英与大众读者的审美趣味差异导致了该书在接受上的两极分化现象；路遥的读者意识和现实主义风格，广播和出版业市场化和规模化发展，以及城市化过程中大量新城市青年的出现，促进了该书在普通读者中的传播和接受效果；普通读者涌入文学场中冲击了文学精英的位置，预示了1990年代以后读者对文学生产更深刻的影响和精英文学受到的威胁。总之，该书集中体现了1980年代后，文学场中“作为艺术的文学”的崛起和逐渐受到“作为大众文化的文学”的冲击的过程。布迪厄文学场理论要结合中国语境，历史地、具体地使用；“文学场”理论对文学的内部研究不足；习性的概念模糊，且没有说明其发展变化过程。
﹀
|
| 外文摘要： |
Based on the Chinese background, this paper dialectically refers to Bourdieu's "Literature Field" and its related concepts and theories, adopts text reading and literature reading methods to conduct a process of the creation , dissemination and acceptance of "The Ordinary World" historically and comprehensively, and rethinking Bourdieu's theory of literary field in turn. This article believes that the difference in aesthetic taste between the literary elite and the general readers has led to the polarization of the book's acceptance; Lu Yao's readers' consciousness and realistic style; the marketization and large-scale development of the broadcasting and publishing industry; and a large number of new developments in the process of urbanization, has promoted the spread and acceptance of the book among ordinary readers; the influx of ordinary readers into the literary field has impacted the position of literary elites, indicating that readers will have a deeper influence on literary production and threats to elite literature after the 1990s. In short, the book embodies the rise of "literature as art" in the literary field and the process of being gradually impacted by "literature as mass culture" after the 1980s. Bourdieu's literary field theory must be "Chinese-styled" and used historically and concretely; "literary field" theory has insufficient internal research on literature; the concept of habit is vague, and it does not explain its development and change process.
﹀
|
| 参考文献总数： | 32 |
| 作者简介： | 北京师范大学文学院本科生 |
| 插图总数： | 0 |
| 插表总数： | 1 |
| 馆藏号： | 本050101/20145 |
| 开放日期： | 2021-06-28 |
谷歌
