NFT数字藏品是数字时代下新型区块链技术在艺术收藏品领域的创新型应用，现有物权和债权理论体系都无法给出与实践相符合的解释，虚拟财产的法律本身的内涵模糊也不足以解释NFT和数字化内容的结合。我国“NFT第一案”是一起关于NFT数字藏品的信息网络传播权纠纷的案件，其中，关于 NFT数字藏品的法律性质与其交易行为的属性认定引起学界的广泛关注，以此为前提，也引发人们对于NFT交易平台的属性及其应当承担的法律责任标准的探讨，以及在知识产权法领域对NFT数字藏品的侵权认定和维护被侵权人的利益的疑虑。权利束理论是英美法系对财产权的一种解读，核心观点是财产应当是一组权利。以权利束视角来看待NFT数字藏品，本质上来讲是弱化了物的属性，而以动态的视角去解析其交易关系中的财产权利，分析NFT数字藏品在实践中的特色与地位归纳其权利的复合性，从而为实践中解决现实中的法律纠纷而服务。

  NFT digital collectibles are innovative applications of new blockchain technology in the field of art collectibles in the digital age. The existing theoretical systems of property rights and creditor's rights cannot provide explanations that are consistent with practice, and the legal connotation of virtual property itself is vague and insufficient to explain the combination of NFT and digital content. The first NFT case in China is a dispute over the information network dissemination rights of NFT digital collectibles. Among them, the recognition of the legal nature of NFT digital collectibles and their transaction behavior has attracted widespread attention in academia. Based on this premise, it has also sparked discussions on the attributes of NFT trading platforms and the legal liability standards they should bear, as well as doubts about the infringement recognition of NFT digital collectibles and the protection of the interests of the infringed in the field of intellectual property law. The theory of bundle of rights is an interpretation of property rights in the Anglo American legal system, with the core idea that property should be a set of rights. Looking at NFT digital collectibles from the perspective of the bundle of rights essentially weakens the attributes of the object, while analyzing the property rights in its transaction relationship from a dynamic perspective, analyzing the characteristics and status of NFT digital collectibles in practice, and summarizing the complexity of their rights, thus serving to resolve legal disputes in practice.