科学技术不断发展下的人工智能正在经历着飞速的迭代和升级，ChatGPT最近已迅速成为了全球最火热的语言模型工具，人工智能的创造成果再次成为智慧时代的焦点问题。通过数据学习和算法执行，人工智能可以在无需人类干预的情况下自主创造出新的发明，而人工智能发明物的不断产生也使得传统专利保护领域面临了多重挑战。人工智能在专利法领域内对知识产权法律制度的冲击由人工智能DABUS案拉开了序幕，该案引出了人工智能发明物专利权保护的三个焦点问题：第一，人工智能发明物是否具有可专利性；第二，人工智能能否被列为发明人；第三，人工智能发明物如果有专利权该如何归属。

文章正文内容分为五章，第一章首先对人工智能及其发明物进行界定。其次，对不同类型的人工智能发明物进行概括分类，并指出它们在规制方面面临的不同挑战。第二章从保护人工智能发明物专利权的理论基础切入，指出人工智能发明物对劳动价值论和人格理论提出了现实挑战，而以结果主义为导向的创新激励理论在一定意义上能够为保护人工智能发明物的专利权提供理论支撑。接着结合DABUS案在各国的最新进展，对人工智能发明物满足专利的实质性审查标准展开论证。第三章的内容是对第二章DABUS案焦点问题的进一步回答，提出可以考虑参照职务发明模式，将发明人与专利权人分离，并赋予人工智能有限法律人格，使其能够凭借对发明物的实质贡献而被列为其发明物的发明人，而人工智能发明物的专利权则授予人工智能拥有者，以达到激励人类通过人工智能进行科技创新的目的。第四章介绍了域外关于人工智能发明物专利保护的立法现状和司法实践，通过分析美国、欧盟以及德国人工智能发明物专利审查的现状，梳理各国或地区对于人工智能发明物的专利保护所持的谨慎有为态度。第五章主要讨论我国人工智能发明物专利立法现状以及完善要点。

文章的创新点在于提出一种新的构想，将发明人与专利权人分离，并参照公司法人制度，将人工智能拟制成发明人，而发明人的权利来源则是享有专利权的人工智能拥有者。如果能最大限度做到人工智能相对独立于人工智能拥有者，就能够在有效保障人工智能发明物专利权的同时，减少因人工智能发明物的侵权行为带来的诉讼成本。

随着人工智能技术的不断发展，专利法律制度也需要不断更新和完善以适应人工智能发明物专利保护的需求。因此，我国应当探索提升人工智能法律位格的方式，逐步规范专利申请流程，加强对数据和算法的保护和监管，为人工智能专利领域的发展提供更有效的规范保障。

With the continuous development of science and technology, artificial intelligence is undergoing rapid iteration and upgrading. ChatGPT has quickly become the hottest language model tool in the world recently, and the creation of artificial intelligence has once again become the focus of the intelligent era. Through data learning and algorithm execution, artificial intelligence can independently create new inventions without human intervention, and the continuous emergence of artificial intelligence inventions also makes the traditional patent protection field face multiple challenges. The impact of artificial intelligence on the intellectual property legal system in the patent law field is also kicked off by the artificial intelligence DABUS case, which leads to three key issues of patent protection of artificial intelligence inventions: first, whether artificial intelligence inventions are patentable; Second, whether artificial intelligence can be listed as an inventor; Third, how should artificial intelligence inventions belong if they have patent rights?

The text of the article is divided into five chapters. In the first chapter, artificial intelligence and its inventions are defined. Secondly, the different types of artificial intelligence inventions are classified and the different challenges they face in regulation are pointed out. The second chapter starts from the theoretical basis of protecting the patent right of artificial intelligence inventions, and points out that artificial intelligence inventions pose a realistic challenge to the labor theory of value and personality theory, and the innovation incentive theory oriented by consequentialism can provide theoretical support for protecting the patent right of artificial intelligence inventions in a certain sense. Then, combined with the latest progress of DABUS case in various countries, it is demonstrated that artificial intelligence inventions meet the substantive examination standards of patents. The content of the third chapter is a further answer to the focus of the DABUS case in the second chapter, and it is proposed that we can consider separating the inventor from the patentee by referring to the service invention mode, and endow artificial intelligence with limited legal personality, so that it can be listed as the inventor of its invention by virtue of its substantial contribution to the invention, while the patent right of artificial intelligence inventions is granted to the owner of artificial intelligence, so as to achieve the purpose of encouraging human beings to carry out scientific and technological innovation through artificial intelligence. The fourth chapter introduces the legislative status and judicial practice of patent protection of artificial intelligence inventions abroad. By analyzing the current situation of patent examination of artificial intelligence inventions in the United States, the European Union and Germany, it sorts out the cautious and promising attitudes of various countries towards patent protection of artificial intelligence inventions. The fifth chapter mainly discusses the current situation of patent legislation of artificial intelligence inventions in China and the key points of improvement.

The innovation of this paper is to put forward a new idea, which separates the inventor from the patentee, and refers to the company legal person system to make artificial intelligence into an inventor, and the source of the inventor's rights is the owner of artificial intelligence who enjoys the patent right. If the status of artificial intelligence and the owner of artificial intelligence can be relatively independent to the greatest extent, the patent right of artificial intelligence inventions can be effectively guaranteed and the litigation cost caused by the infringement of artificial intelligence inventions can be reduced.

With the ongoing progress of artificial intelligence technology, the patent legal system also needs to be constantly updated and improved to meet the needs of patent protection of artificial intelligence inventions. Therefore, China should explore ways to improve the legal status of artificial intelligence, gradually standardize the patent application process, strengthen the protection and supervision of data and algorithms, and provide more effective normative guarantee for the development of artificial intelligence patents.