黄锦树是马华文坛的代表人物之一，自20世纪80年代开始创作以来，他已发表及出版了大量作品。除写作以外，黄锦树同时也是一位极具个性的文学评论家。自提出“马华文学经典缺席”开始，他便因其大胆犀利的言论而不断卷入一系列论争当中，有学者将这一系列论争统称为“黄锦树现象”，他本人也之成了马华文坛中备受关注的的“坏孩子”。上世纪90年代，马华文坛开始与大陆文坛接轨，黄锦树也在此潮流中被大陆学者所关注。本文将通过文献统计、内容分析、比较研究等方法，聚焦大陆学者及马来西亚学者对黄锦树的研究，也即在对其研究的基础上进行再研究，以厘清中国和马来西亚学者在不同的文化语境下，对黄锦树作品、所引发的文化现象及其影响之研究的差异性与相互影响，同时通过这种比较研究，从更加多元的角度去分析黄锦树复杂的文学与身份认同，以及其在不同的国别与文化背景下的接受与变异。

Ng Kim Chew is one of the leading figures in the Malaysian literary scene, and has published a large number of works since he started writing in the 1980s. In addition to his writing, he is also a highly individualistic literary critic. He has been involved in a series of controversies over his bold and incisive statements since he first proposed the "absence of the classics in Malaysian literature", which some scholars have referred to as the "Ng Kim Chew phenomenon". He has become a so called 'bad boy' in the Malaysian literary scene. In the 1990s, when the Malaysian literary scene began to converge with the mainland literary scene, Ng Kim Chew was also brought to the attention of mainland scholars in this trend. This thesis will focus on the research on Ng Kim Chew by mainland scholars and Malaysian scholars through literature statistics, content analysis and comparative studies, i.e. to conduct a re-examination on the basis of their research, in order to clarify the differences and mutual influences between Chinese and Malaysian scholars' research on Ng Kim Chew 's works, the cultural phenomena he triggered and his influence in different cultural contexts, and through this comparative study, to analyse Ng Kim Chew from a more Through this comparative study, the complex literary and self- identity of Ng Kim Chew, as well as its reception and variation in different national and cultural contexts, can be analysed from a more diverse perspective.