“V单+N单”的结构类型，一般是动宾，但也可以是定中或动宾定中两可。本文从N单的语义角色和语义特征、V单的语义特征以及V单与N单的相互选择性等方面对制约“V单+N单”结构类型的因素进行了分析，并与“V双+N双”结构的制约因素进行了比较。制约动宾“V单+N单”的语义角色序列为：对象>受事>致使>原因目的>处所范围>时间>方式状态>主事>结果>材料>施事>工具。当符合以下条件时，“V单+N单”容易理解为动宾结构：（1）N单为自由语素，具体性词语，是非人或非动物、非人工制件、自然事物；（2）V单可带谓词性宾语，具有较多的义项，表示日常生活动作、对自然事物的处理；（3）“V单+N单”具有隐含意义。制约定中“V单+N单”的语义角色序列为：度量基准、伴随凭借>类属>工具>施事>材料>主事>结果>时间>方式状态>处所范围>原因目的>致使>受事>对象。当符合以下条件时，“V单+N单”容易理解为定中结构：（1）N单为粘着语素，概括性词语，是人或动物、人工制品、食物名称；（2）V单义项数量较少，表示工农业生产活动、人类社会活动、烹饪动作、表示人的心理、情感、状态等意义。制约动宾定中两可“V单+N单”的语义角色序列为：结果>致使>材料>方式状态>受事>主事>对象>处所范围>工具>施事>类属。当N单表示与钱财、言语信息、运动项目相关的意义时，“V单+N单”容易理解为动宾定中结构。“V单+N单”与“V双+N双”结构类型的制约因素在语义角色、动名词的语义特征等方面既表现出相似性，也存在不同之处，体现了语义对词法与句法制约性的异同。定中“V单/双+N单/双”，N的语义角色类型较多，靠近原型施事，概括性较强；V的义项数量相对较少，对N具有分类、限定作用；语义内容与“人”相关。制约“V单+N单”与“V双+N双”的语义角色序列并不完全相同；N的[+高生命度]对“V双+N双”结构的制约作用明显，对“V单+N单”的制约性较为复杂；表示心理活动的V不易理解为定中“V双+N双”，容易理解为定中“V单+N单”；N的控制度、专有性、限量性，V的特征性、及物性、自主性和价对“V双+N双”的结构具有制约作用，而对“V单+N单”的制约性不大。本文以《现代汉语词典（第五版）》中的“V单+N单”为研究对象，采用归纳的方法，通过定量统计和内部外部的多方比较对制约“V单+N单”结构的因素进行分析，从语义角度分析句法结构的成因，进一步说明语义和语法的联系，深化了对汉语“V单+N单”的认识。但制约“V单+N单”结构的因素十分复杂，本文的概括必定还存在疏漏，对制约“V单+N单”结构因素的解释也还不够深入。

The“single-syllable V + single-syllable N”configuration，which is usually verb-object relationship，can also be attributive-head relationship and homograph ambiguity of relationship. This paper analyzes the factors affecting the“single-syllable V + single-syllable N”structure from the angles of single-syllable N’s semantic roles and feature，single-syllable V’s semantic feature and mutual semantic selectivity. “Single-syllable V + single-syllable N”and“double-syllable V + double-syllable N” are compared from their restriction in the end. The order of semantic roles to make“single-syllable V + single-syllable N”easily become verb-object structure is“object > patient > effect > reason and purpose > location and range > time > manner > theme > result > material > agent > instrument”.When single-syllable N is a free or concrete morpheme，or coveys meaning of nature instead of human，animals and artifacts，single-syllable V can carry predicative object，owns many meanings，or relates to nature things or daily life，“single-syllable V + single-syllable N”has extended meanings， it is easy for“single-syllable V + single-syllable N”to become verb-object structure. The order of semantic roles to make“single-syllable V + single- syllable N”easily become attributive-head structure is“measure, crition and reliance > category > instrument > agent > material > theme > result > time > manner > location and range > reason and purpose > effect > patient > object”.When single-syllable N is an adhensive or general-idea morpheme，or relates to human，animals， artifacts and food，single-syllable V is with fewer sense，express the meaning of industrial and agricultural production， human social activities， cooking and human’s feelings，emotions and conditions，“single-syllable V + single-syllable N”is easy to become attributive-head structure. The semantic roles’order to make“single-syllable V + single-syllable N”easily become homograph ambiguity structure is“result > effect > material > manner > patient > theme > object > location and range > instrument > agent > category”.When single-syllable N is concerning to economy，language information and sports，“single-syllable V + single-syllable N”is easy to be the homograph ambiguity structure.The restrictions for“single-syllable V + single-syllable N”and “double-syllable V + double-syllable N” own both similarities and differences in semantic roles，and V and N’s semantic feature，which shows the similarities and differences of semantic restriction to the grammar of words and phrases. N of attributive-head “V + N”structure owns more semantic role types, has prototype agent tendency and high generality. V of attributive-head “V + N” has relatively few senses, having classification and limited effect on N. Semantic content of “V + N” is related to human being. The restriction of N’s semantic roles’ order to make “V + N” different congurations is not totally the same. N’s degree of life has obvious restrictive effects on “double-syllable V + doule-syllable N”, however, it is not specific for “single-syllable V + single-syllable N”. Psychological verbs tend to make attributive-head “single-syllable V + single-syllable N”, while avoid the formation of “double-syllable V + double-syllable N”. N’s degree of control, exclusive and limiration, V’s characteristic, transitivity and valence, which have strong restriction on “double-syllable V + double-syllable N”, have few influence on “single-syllable V + single-syllable N” congutation.This paper bases on “single-syllable V + single-syllable N” of Modern Chinese Dictionary (Fifth Edition), taking inductive method, through quantitative statistical and multi comparison of internal and external, to analyzise “single-syllable V + single-syllable N” conguration from the angle of senmantic. Semantic and grammatical relations are illustrated and the understanding of “single-syllable V + single-syllable N” in Chinese is deepened. However, since the restrictive factors on “single-syllable V + single-syllable N” configuration is much complex, this paper’s summary must also has flaws and the oversight, and the explainations on language phenomena do not go far enough.