在系统功能语言学中，语篇发生学是指意义在语篇中的建构和发展过程，这一抽象发生学系统体现为各语言层的意义的具体选择。从语篇发生学视角研究中文政治语篇，旨在探究该类语篇中意义建构与发展的历时特点。 有关中文政治语篇的历时研究集中在认知语言学和社会语言学两个领域。前者主要研究政治语篇中的概念隐喻，而后者则试图揭示语言所体现的权力关系。两者皆忽略了对政治语篇中的政治语言知识本身的研究。 马丁在2017年发表的文章中提出质量这一概念，即从三个维度对话语意义的生成进行分析，即技术性、图标性和内聚性。技术性是指对非常识性知识的概念意义进行压缩和重组；图标性是指对某个社会群体有重大影响的信念和价值观；内聚性指通过组织和衔接所产生的语篇意义的内聚力。 基于这三个维度，根据汉语语言的发展分期四阶段，即上古汉语、中古汉语、近代汉语、现代汉语，此研究采用历时视角对中文政治语篇中的技术性、图标性、内聚性进行研究。经分析发现，就技术性而言，该类语篇中的术语主要有四种类型，即称谓术语、礼貌术语、分类术语和历史术语。称谓术语是社会分层化和社会平等化的反映；礼貌术语体现古代社会中的尊卑次序；分类术语整合具有相似特征的人和事物；历史术语记录特定时代的重大事件。另外，名词化和形容词化是语法隐喻的主要体现形式，其在概念意义的压缩和重组、语篇意义的推进方面发挥重要作用。就图标性而言，地域、个体、群体、国家是身份建构的主要形式，而春秋战国时期的百家思想、四书五经、民间俗语谚语、各个历史时期与政治相关的伟人英雄、古籍古迹是共同价值观的建构方式。就内聚性而言，以篇首为宏观主位，篇尾为宏观新信息，段首为超主位，段末为超新信息为特点的语篇结构是该类语篇中最常见的模式，而四者之间的关系又呈现为七种具体的语篇模式，即独立模式、超新信息同一模式、超主位同一模式、超新信息和超主位同一模式、宏观主位分离模式、宏观新信息分离模式、螺旋模式。总之，严密的分类和组织、意义的延续性、语义密度的不断加强是中文政治语篇的话语发生三大特点。 总之，研究结果对认识政治语篇知识与结构，从语言学角度解释政治语篇的专业性提供了一定的理论指导意义。

Logogenesis in Systemic Functional Linguistics is an abstract system of meaning construction and evolution in text unfolding, which is instantiated into textual patterns woven by specific choices in each strata of language system. Adopting this perspective to look closely at the development of Chinese political discourse, it is aimed to detect linguistic characteristics and textual features in diachronic manner. Previous studies on Chinese political discourse focus on cognitive and sociolinguistics approach. The former typically revolves on conceptual metaphor to explore what metaphorical meaning is constructed in political discourses while the latter detects power relations and interactions between language and society; both ignore the nature of political language or political knowledge itself. Mass, a concept put forward by Martin (2017), consisting of three dimensions, technicality, iconization and aggregation, provides a comprehensive framework to unveil features of political knowledge swarmed into political discourses. Technicality is the process whereby ideational meaning of uncommon knowledge is condensed and reorganized. Iconization refers to interpersonal meaning which is vital for a group of members within a community. Aggregation is the endocentric effect of textual meaning through composition and cohesion. Based on three dimensions, this thesis studies logogenetic features of Chinese political discourse on four stages of Chinese language evolution, Old Chinese, Middle Chinese, Modern Chinese and Contemporary Chinese. For technicality, it is found that technical terms in Chinese political discourse are generally categorized into four groups, address terms, the result of social stratification or the call of social equality; polite terms, reflecting the rank of nobility and authority in ancient times; categorization terms for aligning substances or people of similar traits; history-related terms as the jargon in certain era. With regard to grammatical metaphor, nominalization and adjectiviation are major types throughout the whole analysis, which plays a vital role in meaning reconstruction and textual progression. As for iconization, location identity, individual identity, group identity, state identity, Chinese philosophy from all schools of thought in Spring and Autumn period, Four Books, Five Classics and folk sayings, heroes, heritage in political realm are main means of presenting core values and beliefs shared by a group of people in a community. For aggregation, Macro-Theme at the very beginning of the text, Macro-New at the closing section, Hyper-Theme at the starting and Hyper-New at the ending of each paragraph is the most common textual pattern, while specifically the relationships among them can be summarized into seven models, independent model, parallel Hyper-New model, parallel Hyper-Theme model, parallel Hyper-Theme and Hyper-New model, Macro-Theme split model, Macro-New split model, and spiral model. In a nutshell, logogenesis of Chinese political discourse is featured by rigorous taxonomies and textual composition, meaning continuity, and increasing semantic density and complexity. The research results are conducive to illustrating textual patterns in political discourse writing, and raising awareness of what political knowledge is and how it is realized in discourses, and providing possible explanations of the convoluted features of political discourses in linguistic viewpoint.