随着互联网大数据时代的到来，新型犯罪方式应运而生，不法分子利用电信网络的非接触性和虚拟性对公民实施诈骗并躲避侦查，严重侵害了公民的财产权益和网络及社会的正常秩序。甚至，形成了分工明确、配合有序的诈骗团伙和灰黑色产业链，关联犯罪和上下游犯罪猖獗，犯罪成本低而治理成本高，不利于社会主义法治建设和国家治理水平的提升。因此，如何合法又合理地认定电信网络诈骗犯罪，对其进行有效的规制是我们需要面对的难题。笔者通过查阅文献、研读裁判案例对电信网络诈骗的特征、认定和存在的难题做了分析总结，提出了自己的观点看法，希望能对电信网络诈骗犯罪的治理提供一定的参考和帮助。

笔者认为刑法规制指的是国家通过刑法对特定行为进行规范和约束，对违反刑法规定的行为主体施加刑罚处罚的法律机制。故而，本文以问题为导向，主要对电信网络诈骗的定罪问题及认定进行分析，以量刑问题及认定为辅，对电信网络诈骗的认定问题提出自己的观点和看法，最后创新性的提出了单独设立电信网络诈骗罪的观点并对其原因和可行性加以论述。

在对电信网络诈骗的定罪问题中，笔者采用分类思维和对比思维，与传统的诈骗罪作类比，在处分意识的认定中支持处分意识的对象包括财产性利益和处分意识必要说，在“占有”的认识上认为骗取规范性的占有仍属于电信网络诈骗的范畴；在诈骗的指向对象上认为对象不特定；在共同犯罪的认定问题中，支持从主观入手区分共同犯罪和关联犯罪、从犯罪行为和发挥的作用地位区分主从犯、既遂标准说认定共犯参与行为的时间点；在对犯罪数额的认定中，笔者提倡以失控说作为犯罪既遂的标准更具有操作性。

本文通过对电信网络诈骗的刑法规制问题研究，以期在打击电信网络诈骗犯罪活动中对犯罪的行为方式和特征有更深刻的认识和更准确的认定，不遗漏评价，不错误评价，严厉打击的同时不滥用刑罚，达到良法善治的效果。

With the arrival of the Internet big data era, new types of criminal activities have emerged, and criminals have taken advantage of the non-contact and virtual nature of telecommunications and the internet to defraud citizens and evade detection, seriously infringing on citizens' property rights and the normal order of the internet and society. In fact, organized criminal gangs and a gray and black industrial chain have emerged, with clear division of labor and coordinated cooperation, and associated crimes and crimes at the upstream and downstream are rampant. The cost of crime is low while the cost of governance is high, which is not conducive to the construction of socialist rule of law and the improvement of national governance level. Therefore, how to legally and reasonably define telecommunications and network fraud crimes and effectively regulate them is a problem we need to face. By reviewing literature and studying judicial cases, this paper analyzes the characteristics, definition, and existing difficulties of telecommunications and network fraud, and puts forward its own views and opinions, hoping to provide some reference and help for the governance of telecommunications and network fraud crimes.

The author believes that the regulation of criminal law refers to the legal mechanism that the state regulates and constrains the specific behavior through criminal law and imposes punishment on the subject who violates the provisions of criminal law. Therefore, this paper is problem-oriented, mainly analyzes the conviction and identification of telecom network fraud, and proposes its own views and opinions on the identification of telecom network fraud with the supplement of sentencing and identification. Finally, it innovatively puts forward the view of setting up a separate crime of telecom network fraud and discusses its causes and feasibility.

In the conviction of telecom network fraud, the author adopts classification thinking and contrast thinking, and makes an analogy with the traditional fraud crime. In the recognition of punishment consciousness, the objects supporting punishment consciousness include property interests and punishment consciousness, and the understanding of "possession" thinks that the normative possession of fraud still belongs to the category of telecom network fraud. The target of the fraud is considered to be not specific; In the identification of joint crime, we support the subjective distinction between joint crime and associated crime, the distinction between principal and subordinate crime and the time point of the accomplice's participation in the criminal behavior. In the identification of the amount of crime, the author advocates that it is more operational to take the theory of losing control as the standard of crime accomplishment.

Through the study of the criminal law regulation of telecommunications network fraud, this paper aims to have a deeper understanding and more accurate identification of the behavior patterns and features of telecommunications network fraud crimes, without missing or misjudging them, to severely punish them without abusing the law, and to achieve the goal of good law and governance.