随着国务院“放管服”改革的持续推进，越来越多的民众享受到让利于民的政策红利。然而改革中的红利耗散现象也值得注意，点滴都关系到政府职能的转变和政府的公信力。为减轻企业负担，促进实体经济发展，2017年4月1日起国家质量监督检验检疫总局停征强制检定收费。质检总局系统已经打开了停征强制检定行政事业性收费的全新局面，然而政策初期却引起一阵不小的骚动。一类是企业用户积极申请强制检定计量器具检定，却排不上队；二类是企业用户在申请过程中面临办事流程复杂的困难与界定免征范畴的困惑；三类是企业用户不得不对复合型计量器具进行拆分，送检属于强制检定的那部分计量器具的不便。本研究的研究问题就是结合当前公共政策与社会实践，探究停征强制检定收费后却没有得到企业用户正向反馈的现象。 租值耗散理论研究日渐成熟，并在准公共物品与政府管制方面实践丰富。以往的研究与实践关注的耗散途径从政策制定、政策执行、政策评估、政策环境到行政伦理，然而大量的研究成果依然没能阻止到当前实践中的政策红利耗散现象发生。 本研究采用质性研究的方法，策略是案例研究，采用半结构式访谈收集数据。以北京地区停征医疗卫生强制检定收费为例，利用租值耗散理论对停征政策后其中出现的没有正向反馈现象进行政策红利耗散现象界定，并分别从政策制定结合政策环境和政策执行结合政策环境的视角分析停征强制检定收费以来医学计量需求与计量检定资源不足之间矛盾的具体成因，继而相应地提出完善公共政策完全释放红利可操作性的对策建议。 本研究最终发现了免征政策以来其中产生红利耗散现象的复杂情境。免征政策的落地与同期推进的事业单位分类改革、计量技术机构改革、公车改革政策在顶层设计融合不足；加上免征政策出台突然，执行层面并未做好准备；还有计量法律法规滞后与管理体制滞后；当然政策过程中也不乏政策执行者工作理念与服务意识的影响；外忧是医学计量的特殊性及医疗卫生机构日益增长的计量需求。总之，这一发现将为中国公共政策研究提供一个丰富的素材和典型的案例，从而希望能拓展公共政策研究的空间，能为社会治理提供技术支撑贡献绵薄之力，能对改革架桥铺路有所裨益。

With the continuous advancement of reforming in “SimplifiedDecentralization, Strengthened Management and Optimized Services” proposed bythe State Council, increasing number of people are enjoying the dividendbrought by this policy. However, the phenomenon of dividend dissipation in thereform is worthy to pay attention, as this is closely related to thegovernment's credibility and the changes of government’s functions. In order toreduce the burden of the enterprise and promote the development of the realeconomy, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection andQuarantine of the People’s Republic of China suspended mandatory certificationfees on April 1, 2017. The General Administration of Quality Supervision has setup a completely new situation in the suspended mandatory certification fees,but the initial policy has caused a quite large disturbance. One is thatenterprise users actively apply for measuring instruments of compulsory verification,but they are not in the team. The other is the difficulties faced by enterpriseusers in the application process, including complicated work-flow and definitionof exemption. The third type is that the enterprise users have to split complexmeasurement apparatus and submit, which is inconvenient. The study combined thecurrent policy and social practice to investigate the phenomenon where positivefeedback was not received from enterprise users after suspecting mandatoryverification fees. The theory of the dissipated rent has matured and has beenenriched in quasi-public goods and government regulations. The previousresearch and practice focused on the ways of dissipation from policyformulation, policy implementation, policy evaluation, and policy environmentto administrative ethics. However, a large number of research results havestill not prevented the dissipation of dividends to take place in currentpractice. This study adopted a qualitative research method with a casestudy. Semi-structured interviews are used to collect data. Taking an exampleof the cancellation of medical and health mandatory certification fees inBeijing, this study defined the dividends dissipation for situations after thecancellation using the theory of rental value dissipation. The study combinedperspectives on the formulation, implementation, and environment of the policy,analyzed the causes for the insufficient benefits from the dividends in themedical and health industry, and sequentially provided several practicalcountermeasures and suggestions. This study eventually found complex situations in whichdividends dissipation generated, which are listed as follows. Exemption policiesand the top-level designs are not integrated with classified reform of publicinstitution, organized reform of measurement technology, and reform policies ofbus in the same period; the exemption policy is introduced while theimplementation level is not ready; measurement laws and regulations and themanagement system are lagging behind; lacks of policy practitioners' workingphilosophy and service awareness affect the process of policies; Also, externalconcerns are the specificity of medical measurement and the increasingmeasurement needs of medical and health institutions. In summary, this findingwill provide a rich source of material and a typical case for China’s publicpolicy research. This study hopefully expands the space for public policyresearch, contribute technical support to social governance, and contributebridge construction to the reform.