《中华人民共和国民法典》（以下简称“《民法典》”）第1194条至1197条关于网络侵权的4条规定行文简洁但内涵丰富，在总结过往十几年立法及司法经验的同时，一定程度上回应了实践及时代的呼唤，确立了我国网络侵权领域的基本规则。

耙梳新千年后我国互联网立法实践可知，民法典网络侵权相关条款滥觞于《信息网络传播权保护条例》（以下简称“信传条例”），以《侵权责任法》第36条为基本框架，辅以《电子商务法》中局限于电子商务经营者知识产权侵权领域的“转通知”、“反通知”及“红旗规则”等规则，从而形成具有丰富内涵并可广泛适用的新的网络侵权条款群。值得注意的是，网络侵权规则特别是其核心规则“避风港规则”于1998年在美国诞生，至今已经超过20年，随着网络技术和应用生态的长足发展，国内外政府机构、学术界对网络侵权规则实践效果的审视与评估也一直在进行当中。

本文首先在第一部分对选题背景、研究意义等加以阐述；第二部分概括性介绍网络侵权规则的起源、在不同国家的应用模式以及最新的立法进展；第三部分对民法典网络侵权条款群进行评析，包括介绍网络侵权规则在我国的引入过程，阐述我国民法典网络侵权条款群的立法演变及条文的详细内容，结合司法裁判及国外最新进展包括美国的“512报告”及欧盟《单一数字市场版权指令》的详细内容及争议，分析研究网络侵权条款群的进步及不足；第四部分重点分析我国网络侵权条款群完善的必要性并提出针对性的建议。

在当前网络技术及网络生态下，吸收美国及欧盟最新立法及司法实践经验教训，通过建构权利人与网络服务提供者的多赢合作机制，开发统一的标准技术措施，引入快速争议解决程序或第三方调解程序，从而完善和发展网络侵权条款群，将进一步推动互联网行业的发展。

The Internet infringement clauses (hereinafter referred to as the "Internet Infringement Clauses") as determined in Articles 1194 to 1197 of the Civil Code, drafted on the basis of the "Notice-Delete" rule in Article 36 of the "Tort Liability Law", introduces rules of "Notice-Delete", "Re-notification", "Counter-notification" and "Red Flag Rules" that are limited to the scope of intellectual property infringement in the "E-commerce Law" to scope of all civil rights and interests, forming new Internet infringement clauses which has rich connotations and can be widely applicable. Internet Infringement Clauses, especially its core "Safe Harbor Rules", were born in the United States of America in 1998, and has been applied for more than 20 years. At present, a new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation is sweeping the world. New technologies represented by cloud computing are constantly emerging. Governments and academic community are also reviewing and evaluating the practical effects of Internet Infringement Clauses.

In this article, the topic background, research purpose, etc. are explained in first part; the second part is a general introduction of the origin of the Internet Infringement Clauses, the application models in different countries and its latest legislative development; the third part is about the evaluation and analysis of Internet Infringement Clauses of the Civil Code, including the introducing process, analysis of the legislative evolution and the detail content of the provisions with judicial practice and latest developments in foreign countries; the fourth part focuses on the analysis of the necessity of perfecting China's Internet Infringement Clauses and providing targeted suggestions.

In China, after years of legislation and judicial practice, the connotation and extension of the Internet Infringement Clauses have achieved considerable development and have gradually developed China's characteristics in practice. Under the current network technology and network ecosystem, through absorbing the latest legislative practice, judicial practice experience and lessons from advanced countries, applying technical measures through the construction of a cooperation mechanism between right holders and online service providers, introducing third party mediation procedures, the Internet industry will be further developed.